The static analyzer noticed that we were dereferencing it even when the default null value was being used. Further investigation showed that we never explicitly set the parameter so I've just removed it entirely.
llvm-svn: 372217
Fixes quoting of profile arguments to work on Windows
Suppresses adding profile arguments to linker flags when using lld-link
Avoids -fprofile-instr-use being added to rc.exe flags
Removes duplicated adding of -fprofile-instr-use to linker flags (since
r355541)
Move handling LLVM_PROFDATA_FILE to HandleLLVMOptions.cmake
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62063
llvm-svn: 372209
This patch fixes a bug exposed by D65653 where a subsequent invocation
of `determineCalleeSaves` ends up with a different size for the callee
save area, leading to different frame-offsets in debug information.
In the invocation by PEI, `determineCalleeSaves` tries to determine
whether it needs to spill an extra callee-saved register to get an
emergency spill slot. To do this, it calls 'estimateStackSize' and
manually adds the size of the callee-saves to this. PEI then allocates
the spill objects for the callee saves and the remaining frame layout
is calculated accordingly.
A second invocation in LiveDebugValues causes estimateStackSize to return
the size of the stack frame including the callee-saves. Given that the
size of the callee-saves is added to this, these callee-saves are counted
twice, which leads `determineCalleeSaves` to believe the stack has
become big enough to require spilling an extra callee-save as emergency
spillslot. It then updates CalleeSavedStackSize with a larger value.
Since CalleeSavedStackSize is used in the calculation of the frame
offset in getFrameIndexReference, this leads to incorrect offsets for
variables/locals when this information is recalculated after PEI.
Reviewers: omjavaid, eli.friedman, thegameg, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66935
llvm-svn: 372204
Summary:
Currently our expression evaluators only prints very basic errors that are not very useful when writing complex expressions.
For example, in the expression below the user made a type error, but it's not clear from the diagnostic what went wrong:
```
(lldb) expr printf("Modulos are:", foobar%mo1, foobar%mo2, foobar%mo3)
error: invalid operands to binary expression ('int' and 'double')
```
This patch enables full Clang diagnostics in our expression evaluator. After this patch the diagnostics for the expression look like this:
```
(lldb) expr printf("Modulos are:", foobar%mo1, foobar%mo2, foobar%mo3)
error: <user expression 1>:1:54: invalid operands to binary expression ('int' and 'float')
printf("Modulos are:", foobar%mo1, foobar%mo2, foobar%mo3)
~~~~~~^~~~
```
To make this possible, we now emulate a user expression file within our diagnostics. This prevents that the user is exposed to
our internal wrapper code we inject.
Note that the diagnostics that refer to declarations from the debug information (e.g. 'note' diagnostics pointing to a called function)
will not be improved by this as they don't have any source locations associated with them, so caret or line printing isn't possible.
We instead just suppress these diagnostics as we already do with warnings as they would otherwise just be a context message
without any context (and the original diagnostic in the user expression should be enough to explain the issue).
Fixes rdar://24306342
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, shafik, #lldb
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, #lldb
Subscribers: usaxena95, davide, jingham, aprantl, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65646
llvm-svn: 372203
Summary:
The latter is slightly more efficient and communicates the intent of the
API: writeFileAtomically does not own or copy the callback, it merely
calls it at some point.
Reviewers: jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, jfb, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67584
llvm-svn: 372201
This generates worse code, but matches what is done for avx2 and
prevents crashes when more arguments are passed than we have
registers for.
llvm-svn: 372200
Currently, not all user specified relocations
(with clang intrinsic __builtin_preserve_access_index())
will turn into relocations.
In the current implementation, a __builtin_preserve_access_index()
chain is turned into relocation only if the result of the clang
intrinsic is used in a function call or a nonzero offset computation
of getelementptr. For all other cases, the relocatiion request
is ignored and the __builtin_preserve_access_index() is turned
into regular getelementptr instructions.
The main reason is to mimic bpf_probe_read() requirement.
But there are other use cases where relocatable offset is
generated but not used for bpf_probe_read(). This patch
relaxed previous constraints when to generate relocations.
Now, all user __builtin_preserve_access_index() will have
relocations generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67688
llvm-svn: 372198
I don't know what the intent of parts of this test were. We set a
bunch of breakpoints and ran from one to the other, doing "self.runCmd("thread backtrace")"
then continuing to the next one. We didn't actually verify the contents of the backtrace,
nor that we hit the breakpoints we set in any particular order. The only actual test was
to run sel_getName at two of these stops.
So I reduced the test to just stopping at the places where we were actually going to run
an expression, and tested the expression.
llvm-svn: 372196
The filename in the RemarkStreamer should be optional to allow clients
to stream remarks to memory or to existing streams.
This introduces a new overload of `setupOptimizationRemarks`, and avoids
enforcing the presence of a filename at different places.
llvm-svn: 372195
Summary: This way it can be overwritten when cross compiling.
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67641
llvm-svn: 372194
This test is about disassembling symbols in a framework without debug information.
So we don't need to run it once per debug info flavor.
llvm-svn: 372193
Jim pointed out that the LLDB global variables should only be available
in interactive mode. When used from a command for example, their values
might be stale or not at all what the user expects. Therefore we want to
explicitly make these variables unavailable.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67685
llvm-svn: 372192
Starting from r324788 timer groups aren't cleared automatically when
printed out. As a result some timer groups were printed one more time.
For example, "Pass execution timing report" was printed again in
`ManagedStatic<PassTimingInfo>` destructor, "DWARF Emission" in
`ManagedStatic<Name2PairMap> NamedGroupedTimers` destructor.
Fix by clearing timer groups manually.
Reviewers: thegameg, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: thegameg
Subscribers: aprantl, jkorous, dexonsmith, ributzka, aras-p, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67683
llvm-svn: 372191
Summary:
The PGO counter reading will add cold and inlinehint (hot) attributes
to functions that are very cold or hot. This was using hardcoded
thresholds, instead of the profile summary cutoffs which are used in
other hot/cold detection and are more dynamic and adaptable. Switch
to using the summary-based cold/hot detection.
The hardcoded limits were causing some code that had a medium level of
hotness (per the summary) to be incorrectly marked with a cold
attribute, blocking inlining.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67673
llvm-svn: 372189
Since the removal of extensions nodes from schedule trees in r362257 it
is possible to emit parallel code for SCoPs containing
matrix-multiplications. However, the code looking for references used in
outlined statement was not prepared to handle CopyStmts introduced by
the matrix-matrix multiplication detection.
In this case, CopyStmts do not introduce references in addition to the
ones captured by MemoryAccesses, i.e. we change the assertion to accept
CopyStmts and add a regression test for this case.
This fixes llvm.org/PR43164
llvm-svn: 372188
r361845 changed the way we handle "D16" vs. "D32" targets; there used to
be a negative "d16" which removed instructions from the instruction set,
and now there's a "d32" feature which adds instructions to the
instruction set. This is good, but there was an oversight in the
implementation: the behavior of VFPv2 was changed. In particular, the
"vfp2" feature was changed to imply "d32". This is wrong: VFPv2 only
supports 16 D registers.
In practice, this means if you specify -mfpu=vfpv2, the compiler will
generate illegal instructions.
This patch gets rid of "vfp2d16" and "vfp2d16sp", and fixes "vfp2" and
"vfp2sp" so they don't imply "d32".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67375
llvm-svn: 372186
Also, add a diagnostic group, -Wobjc-signed-char-bool, to control all these
related diagnostics.
rdar://51954400
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67559
llvm-svn: 372183
For COFF, a comdat group is really a symbol marked
IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ANY and zero or more other symbols marked
IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ASSOCIATIVE. Typically the associative symbols in
the group are not external and are not referenced by other TUs, they are
things like debug info, C++ dynamic initializers, or other section
registration schemes. The Visual C++ linker reports a duplicate symbol
error for symbols marked IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ASSOCIATIVE even if they
would be discarded after handling the leader symbol.
Fixes coverage-inline.cpp in check-profile after r372020.
llvm-svn: 372182
Fix the warning.
Bugpoint.rst:124:Mismatch: both interpreted text role prefix and
reference suffix.
Note that the line no here is wrong and misleading,
the problem is in line 128, not 124.
llvm-svn: 372181
Behavior'
Create a new section for documenting the floating point options. Move
all the floating point options into this section, and add new entries
for the floating point options that exist but weren't previously
described in the UsersManual.
Patch By: mibintc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67517
llvm-svn: 372180
Exception specifiers are now part of the function type in C++17.
Normally, it is illegal to redeclare the same function or specialize a
template with a different exception specifier, but under
-fms-compatibility, we accept it with a warning. Without this change,
the function types would not match due to the exception specifier, and
clang would claim that the types were "incompatible". Now we emit the
warning and merge the redeclaration as we would in C++14 and earlier.
Fixes PR42842, which is about compiling _com_ptr_t in C++17.
Based on a patch by Alex Fusco <alexfusco@google.com>!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67590
llvm-svn: 372178
This adds support for `-tailcallopt` tail calls to CallLowering. This
piggy-backs off the changes from D67577, since doing it without a bit of
refactoring gets extremely ugly.
Support is basically ported from AArch64ISelLowering. The main difference here
is that tail calls in `-tailcallopt` change the ABI, so there's some extra
bookkeeping for the stack.
Show that we are correctly lowering these by updating tail-call.ll.
Also show that we don't do anything strange in general by updating
fastcc-reserved.ll, which passes `-tailcallopt`, but doesn't emit any tail
calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67580
llvm-svn: 372177
When running in the default mode we don't print anything other than actual output to stdout to make automated processing easier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67522
llvm-svn: 372174
While we already fold that pattern if the sum of shift amounts is not
smaller than bitwidth, there's painfully obvious generalization:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/F5R
I.e. the "sub of shift amounts" tells us how many bits will be left
in the output. If it's less than bitwidth, we simply need to
apply a mask, which is constant.
llvm-svn: 372170
When you begin implementing -tailcallopt, this gets somewhat hairy. Refactor
the call lowering code so that the tail call lowering stuff gets its own
function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67577
llvm-svn: 372164
Simon Atanasyan