Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith a9308c49ef IR: Give 'DI' prefix to debug info metadata
Finish off PR23080 by renaming the debug info IR constructs from `MD*`
to `DI*`.  The last of the `DIDescriptor` classes were deleted in
r235356, and the last of the related typedefs removed in r235413, so
this has all baked for about a week.

Note: If you have out-of-tree code (like a frontend), I recommend that
you get everything compiling and tests passing with the *previous*
commit before updating to this one.  It'll be easier to keep track of
what code is using the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy and what you've already
updated, and I think you're extremely unlikely to insert bugs.  YMMV of
course.

Back to *this* commit: I did this using the rename-md-di-nodes.sh
upgrade script I've attached to PR23080 (both code and testcases) and
filtered through clang-format-diff.py.  I edited the tests for
test/Assembler/invalid-generic-debug-node-*.ll by hand since the columns
were off-by-three.  It should work on your out-of-tree testcases (and
code, if you've followed the advice in the previous paragraph).

Some of the tests are in badly named files now (e.g.,
test/Assembler/invalid-mdcompositetype-missing-tag.ll should be
'dicompositetype'); I'll come back and move the files in a follow-up
commit.

llvm-svn: 236120
2015-04-29 16:38:44 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith f9b4775c78 Verifier: Add operand checks for remaining debug info
llvm-svn: 233565
2015-03-30 17:21:38 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 16d182acb9 Optimize metadata node fields for CHECK-ability
While gaining practical experience hand-updating CHECK lines (for moving
the new debug info hierarchy into place),  I learnt a few things about
CHECK-ability of the specialized node assembly output.

  - The first part of a `CHECK:` is to identify the "right" node (this
    is especially true if you intend to use the new `CHECK-SAME`
    feature, since the first CHECK needs to identify the node correctly
    before you can split the line).
      - If there's a `tag:`, it should go first.
      - If there's a `name:`, it should go next (followed by the
        `linkageName:`, if any).
      - If there's a `scope:`, it should follow after that.
  - When a node type supports multiple DW_TAGs, but one is implied by
    its name and is overwhelmingly more common, the `tag:` field is
    terribly uninteresting unless it's different.
      - `MDBasicType` is almost always `DW_TAG_base_type`.
      - `MDTemplateValueParameter` is almost always
        `DW_TAG_template_value_parameter`.
  - Printing `name: ""` doesn't improve CHECK-ability, and there are far
    more nodes than I realized that are commonly nameless.
  - There are a few other fields that similarly aren't very interesting
    when they're empty.

This commit updates the `AsmWriter` as suggested above (and makes
necessary changes in `LLParser` for round-tripping).

llvm-svn: 230877
2015-02-28 23:21:38 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 3d62bbacb1 IR: Drop scope from MDTemplateParameter
Follow-up to r229740, which removed `DITemplate*::getContext()` after my
upgrade script revealed that scopes are always `nullptr` for template
parameters.  This is the other shoe: drop `scope:` from
`MDTemplateParameter` and its two subclasses.  (Note: a bitcode upgrade
would be pointless, since the hierarchy hasn't been moved into place.)

llvm-svn: 229791
2015-02-19 00:37:21 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 2847f3805e AsmWriter/Bitcode: MDTemplate{Type,Value}Parameter
llvm-svn: 229019
2015-02-13 01:34:32 +00:00