The Win64 calling convention has xmm6-15 as callee-saved while still
clobbering all ymm registers.
Add a YMM_HI_6_15 pseudo-register that aliases the clobbered part of the
ymm registers, and mark that as call-clobbered. This allows live xmm
registers across calls.
This hack wouldn't be necessary with RegisterMask operands representing
the call clobbers, but they are not quite operational yet.
llvm-svn: 149088
. "fptosi" and "fptoui" IR instructions are defined with round-to-zero rounding mode.
. Currently for AVX mode for <4xdouble> and <8xdouble> the "VCVTPD2DQ.128" and "VCVTPD2DQ.256" instructions are selected (for .fp_to_sint. DAG node operation ) by AVX codegen. However they use round-to-nearest-even rounding mode.
. Consequently, the conversion produces incorrect numbers.
The fix is to replace selection of VCVTPD2DQ instructions with VCVTTPD2DQ instructions. The latter use truncate (i.e. round-to-zero) rounding mode.
As .fp_to_sint. DAG node operation is used only for lowering of "fptosi" and "fptoui" IR instructions, the fix in X86InstrSSE.td definition file doesn.t have an impact on other LLVM flows.
The patch includes changes in the .td file, LIT test for the changes and a fix in a legacy LIT test (which produced asm code conflicting with LLVN IR spec).
llvm-svn: 149056
It adds register mask operands to x86 call instructions. Once all the
backend passes support register mask operands, this will be permanently
enabled.
llvm-svn: 148438
When set, this bit indicates that a register is completely defined by
the value of its sub-registers.
Use the CoveredBySubRegs property to infer which super-registers are
call-preserved given a list of callee-saved registers. For example, the
ARM registers D8-D15 are callee-saved. This now automatically implies
that Q4-Q7 are call-preserved.
Conversely, Win64 callees save XMM6-XMM15, but the corresponding
YMM6-YMM15 registers are not call-preserved because they are not fully
defined by their sub-registers.
llvm-svn: 148363
In CanXFormVExtractWithShuffleIntoLoad we assumed that EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT can be later handled by the DAGCombiner.
However, in some cases on AVX, the EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT is legalized to EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR + EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, which
currently is not handled by the DAGCombiner. In this patch I added a check that we only extract from the XMM part.
llvm-svn: 148298
We know that the blend instructions only use the MSB, so if the mask is
sign-extended then we can convert it into a SHL instruction. This is a
common pattern because the type-legalizer sign-extends the i1 type which
is used by the LLVM-IR for the condition.
Added a new optimization in SimplifyDemandedBits for SIGN_EXTEND_INREG -> SHL.
llvm-svn: 148225
The registers are placed into the saved registers list in the reverse order,
which is why the original loop was written to loop backwards.
llvm-svn: 148064
lc: X86ISelLowering.cpp:6480: llvm::SDValue llvm::X86TargetLowering::LowerVECTOR_SHUFFLE(llvm::SDValue, llvm::SelectionDAG&) const: Assertion `V1.getOpcode() != ISD::UNDEF&& "Op 1 of shuffle should not be undef"' failed.
Added a test.
llvm-svn: 148044
Restore the (obviously wrong) behavior from before r147938 without relying on
undefined behavior. Add a fat FIXME note.
This should fix nightly tester failures.
llvm-svn: 148030
In att style asm syntax memory operand size is derived from suffix attached with mnemonic. In intel style asm syntax it is part of memory operand hence predicate method check is required to select appropriate instruction.
llvm-svn: 148006
same pattern. We already had this pattern is a few places, but others
tried to make a rough approximation of an actual DAG structure. As not
everywhere went to this trouble, nothing could rely on this being done.
In fact, I've checked all references to these node Ids, and the ones
that are using the topo-sort properties are actually satisfied with
a strict-weak-ordering. The requirement appears to be that Use >= Def.
I've added a big blurb of comments to this bit of the transform to
clarify why the order is so important for the next reader of the code.
I'm starting with this change as it is very small, and trivially
reverted if something breaks or the >= above really does need to be >.
If that proves the case, we can hide the problem by reverting this
patch, but the problem exists elsewhere as well, and so a more
comprehensive solution will be needed.
llvm-svn: 148001
hoped this would revive one of the llvm-gcc selfhost build bots, but it
didn't so it doesn't appear that my transform is the culprit.
If anyone else is seeing failures, please let me know!
llvm-svn: 147957
strange build bot failures that look like a miscompile into an infloop.
I'll investigate this tomorrow, but I'd both like to know whether my
patch is the culprit, and get the bots back to green.
llvm-svn: 147945
mask+shift pairs at the beginning of the ISD::AND case block, and then
hoist the final pattern into a helper function, simplifying and
reflowing it appropriately. This should have no observable behavior
change, but several simplifications fell out of this such as directly
computing the new mask constant, etc.
llvm-svn: 147939
extracts and scaled addressing modes into its own helper function. No
functionality changed here, just hoisting and layout fixes falling out
of that hoisting.
llvm-svn: 147937
detect a pattern which can be implemented with a small 'shl' embedded in
the addressing mode scale. This happens in real code as follows:
unsigned x = my_accelerator_table[input >> 11];
Here we have some lookup table that we look into using the high bits of
'input'. Each entity in the table is 4-bytes, which means this
implicitly gets turned into (once lowered out of a GEP):
*(unsigned*)((char*)my_accelerator_table + ((input >> 11) << 2));
The shift right followed by a shift left is canonicalized to a smaller
shift right and masking off the low bits. That hides the shift right
which x86 has an addressing mode designed to support. We now detect
masks of this form, and produce the longer shift right followed by the
proper addressing mode. In addition to saving a (rather large)
instruction, this also reduces stalls in Intel chips on benchmarks I've
measured.
In order for all of this to work, one part of the DAG needs to be
canonicalized *still further* than it currently is. This involves
removing pointless 'trunc' nodes between a zextload and a zext. Without
that, we end up generating spurious masks and hiding the pattern.
llvm-svn: 147936
As the comment around 7746 says, it's better to use the x87 extended precision
here than SSE. And the generic code doesn't know how to do that. It also regains
the speed lost for the uint64_to_float.c testcase.
<rdar://problem/10669858>
llvm-svn: 147869
this substraction will result in small negative numbers at worst which
become very large positive numbers on assignment and are thus caught by
the <=4 check on the next line. The >0 check clearly intended to catch
these as negative numbers.
Spotted by inspection, and impossible to trigger given the shift widths
that can be used.
llvm-svn: 147773
Testing: passed 'make check' including LIT tests for all sequences being handled (both SSE and AVX)
Reviewers: Evan Cheng, David Blaikie, Bruno Lopes, Elena Demikhovsky, Chad Rosier, Anton Korobeynikov
llvm-svn: 147601
This small bit of ASM code is sufficient to do what the old algorithm did:
movq %rax, %xmm0
punpckldq (c0), %xmm0 // c0: (uint4){ 0x43300000U, 0x45300000U, 0U, 0U }
subpd (c1), %xmm0 // c1: (double2){ 0x1.0p52, 0x1.0p52 * 0x1.0p32 }
#ifdef __SSE3__
haddpd %xmm0, %xmm0
#else
pshufd $0x4e, %xmm0, %xmm1
addpd %xmm1, %xmm0
#endif
It's arguably faster. One caveat, the 'haddpd' instruction isn't very fast on
all processors.
<rdar://problem/7719814>
llvm-svn: 147593
(x > y) ? x : y
=>
(x >= y) ? x : y
So for something like
(x - y) > 0 : (x - y) ? 0
It will be
(x - y) >= 0 : (x - y) ? 0
This makes is possible to test sign-bit and eliminate a comparison against
zero. e.g.
subl %esi, %edi
testl %edi, %edi
movl $0, %eax
cmovgl %edi, %eax
=>
xorl %eax, %eax
subl %esi, $edi
cmovsl %eax, %edi
rdar://10633221
llvm-svn: 147512
LZCNT instructions are available. Force promotion to i32 to get
a smaller encoding since the fix-ups necessary are just as complex for
either promoted type
We can't do standard promotion for CTLZ when lowering through BSR
because it results in poor code surrounding the 'xor' at the end of this
instruction. Essentially, if we promote the entire CTLZ node to i32, we
end up doing the xor on a 32-bit CTLZ implementation, and then
subtracting appropriately to get back to an i8 value. Instead, our
custom logic just uses the knowledge of the incoming size to compute
a perfect xor. I'd love to know of a way to fix this, but so far I'm
drawing a blank. I suspect the legalizer could be more clever and/or it
could collude with the DAG combiner, but how... ;]
llvm-svn: 147251
'bsf' instructions here.
This one is actually debatable to my eyes. It's not clear that any chip
implementing 'tzcnt' would have a slow 'bsf' for any reason, and unless
EFLAGS or a zero input matters, 'tzcnt' is just a longer encoding.
Still, this restores the old behavior with 'tzcnt' enabled for now.
llvm-svn: 147246
X86ISelLowering C++ code. Because this is lowered via an xor wrapped
around a bsr, we want the dagcombine which runs after isel lowering to
have a chance to clean things up. In particular, it is very common to
see code which looks like:
(sizeof(x)*8 - 1) ^ __builtin_clz(x)
Which is trying to compute the most significant bit of 'x'. That's
actually the value computed directly by the 'bsr' instruction, but if we
match it too late, we'll get completely redundant xor instructions.
The more naive code for the above (subtracting rather than using an xor)
still isn't handled correctly due to the dagcombine getting confused.
Also, while here fix an issue spotted by inspection: we should have been
expanding the zero-undef variants to the normal variants when there is
an 'lzcnt' instruction. Do so, and test for this. We don't want to
generate unnecessary 'bsr' instructions.
These two changes fix some regressions in encoding and decoding
benchmarks. However, there is still a *lot* to be improve on in this
type of code.
llvm-svn: 147244
use the zero-undefined variants of CTTZ and CTLZ. These are just simple
patterns for now, there is more to be done to make real world code using
these constructs be optimized and codegen'ed properly on X86.
The existing tests are spiffed up to check that we no longer generate
unnecessary cmov instructions, and that we generate the very important
'xor' to transform bsr which counts the index of the most significant
one bit to the number of leading (most significant) zero bits. Also they
now check that when the variant with defined zero result is used, the
cmov is still produced.
llvm-svn: 146974
Use information computed while inferring new register classes to emit
accurate, table-driven implementations of getMatchingSuperRegClass().
Delete the old manual, error-prone implementations in the targets.
llvm-svn: 146873
the compact unwind claiming that one register was saved before another, which
isn't all that great in general. Process them in the natural order. Reverse the
list only when necessary for the algorithm.
llvm-svn: 146612
to finalize MI bundles (i.e. add BUNDLE instruction and computing register def
and use lists of the BUNDLE instruction) and a pass to unpack bundles.
- Teach more of MachineBasic and MachineInstr methods to be bundle aware.
- Switch Thumb2 IT block to MI bundles and delete the hazard recognizer hack to
prevent IT blocks from being broken apart.
llvm-svn: 146542
undefined result. This adds new ISD nodes for the new semantics,
selecting them when the LLVM intrinsic indicates that the undef behavior
is desired. The new nodes expand trivially to the old nodes, so targets
don't actually need to do anything to support these new nodes besides
indicating that they should be expanded. I've done this for all the
operand types that I could figure out for all the targets. Owners of
various targets, please review and let me know if any of these are
incorrect.
Note that the expand behavior is *conservatively correct*, and exactly
matches LLVM's current behavior with these operations. Ideally this
patch will not change behavior in any way. For example the regtest suite
finds the exact same instruction sequences coming out of the code
generator. That's why there are no new tests here -- all of this is
being exercised by the existing test suite.
Thanks to Duncan Sands for reviewing the various bits of this patch and
helping me get the wrinkles ironed out with expanding for each target.
Also thanks to Chris for clarifying through all the discussions that
this is indeed the approach he was looking for. That said, there are
likely still rough spots. Further review much appreciated.
llvm-svn: 146466
subdirectories to traverse into.
- Originally I wanted to avoid this and just autoscan, but this has one key
flaw in that new subdirectories can not automatically trigger a rerun of the
llvm-build tool. This is particularly a pain when switching back and forth
between trees where one has added a subdirectory, as the dependencies will
tend to be wrong. This will also eliminates FIXME implicitly.
llvm-svn: 146436
does. The _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ is still magical in that we get a R_386_GOTPC,
but it doesn't change the immediate in the same way as when the expression
has no right hand side symbol.
llvm-svn: 146311
if (HasAVX)
X86SSELevel = NoMMXSSE;
This is so patterns that are predicated on hasSSE3, etc. would not be selected when avx is available. Instead, the AVX variant is selected.
However, this breaks instructions which do not have AVX variants.
The right way to fix this is for the SSE but not-AVX patterns to predicate on something like hasSSE3() && !hasAVX().
Then we can take out the hack in X86Subtarget.cpp. Patterns which do not have AVX variants do not need to change.
However, we need to audit all the patterns before we make the change. This patch is workaround that fixes one specific case,
the prefetch instructions. rdar://10538297
llvm-svn: 146163
generator to it. For non-bundle instructions, these behave exactly the same
as the MC layer API.
For properties like mayLoad / mayStore, look into the bundle and if any of the
bundled instructions has the property it would return true.
For properties like isPredicable, only return true if *all* of the bundled
instructions have the property.
For properties like canFoldAsLoad, isCompare, conservatively return false for
bundles.
llvm-svn: 146026
Craig Topper