This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.
To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545
llvm-svn: 199250
Summary:
This makes us more compatible with MSVC 2012+ and fixes PR17748 where we
would give two tables the same name.
Rather than doing a fresh depth-first traversal of the inheritance graph
for every record's vbtables, now we memoize vbtable paths for each
record. By doing memoization, we end up considering virtual bases of
subobjects that come later in the depth-first traversal. Where
previously we would have ignored a virtual base that we'd already seen,
we now consider it for name mangling purposes without emitting a
duplicate vbtable for it.
Reviewers: majnemer
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2509
llvm-svn: 198462
In Itanium, dynamic classes have one vtable with several different
address points for dynamic base classes that can't share vtables.
In the MS C++ ABI, each vbtable that can't be shared gets its own
symbol, similar to how ctor vtables work in Itanium. However, instead
of mangling the subobject offset into the symbol, the unique portions of
the inheritance path are mangled into the symbol to make it unique.
This patch implements the MSVC 2012 scheme for forming unique vbtable
symbol names. MSVC 2010 use the same mangling with a different subset
of the path. Implementing that mangling and possibly others is TODO.
Each vbtable is an array of i32 offsets from the vbptr that points to it
to another virtual base subobject. The first entry of a vbtable always
points to the base of the current subobject, implying that it is the
same no matter which parent class contains it.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D636
llvm-svn: 184309
Reid Kleckner