This version includes an update for imath (isl-0.17.1-49-g2f1c129). It fixes
the compilation under windows, which does not know ssize_t.
In addition, isl-0.17.1-288-g0500299 changed the way isl_test finds the source
directory. It now generates a file isl_srcdir.c at configure-time, containing
the source path, to not require setting the environment variable "srcdir" at
test-time. The cmake build system had to be modified to also generate that file.
llvm-svn: 288811
Unsigned operations are often useful to support but the heuristics are
not yet tuned. This options allows to disable them if necessary.
llvm-svn: 288521
Relational comparisons should not involve multiple potentially
aliasing pointers. Similarly this should hold for switch conditions
and the two conditions involved in equality comparisons (separately!).
This is a heuristic based on the C semantics that does only allow such
operations when the base pointers do point into the same object.
Since this makes aliasing likely we will bail out early instead of
producing a probably failing runtime check.
llvm-svn: 288516
It did happen that after the inliner finished we end up with promotable
allocas in a function. We now run mem2reg to make sure everything is
promoted if possible.
llvm-svn: 288514
This allows us to delinearize code such as the one below, where the array
sizes are A[][2 * n] as there are n times two elements in the innermost
dimension. Alternatively, we could try to generate another dimension for the
struct in the innermost dimension, but as the struct has constant size,
recovering this dimension is easy.
struct com {
double Real;
double Img;
};
void foo(long n, struct com A[][n]) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < 1000; j++)
A[i][j].Real += A[i][j].Img;
}
int main() {
struct com A[100][1000];
foo(1000, A);
llvm-svn: 288489
After having built memory accesses we perform some additional transformations
on them to increase the chances that our delinearization guesses the right
shape. Only after these transformations, we take the assumptions that the
array shape we predict is such that no out-of-bounds memory accesses arise.
Before this change, the construction of the memory access, the access folding
that improves the represenation for certain parametric subscripts, and taking
the assumption was all done right after a memory access was created. In this
change we split this now into three separate iterations over all memory
accesses. This means only after all memory accesses have been built, we start
to canonicalize accesses, and to take assumptions. This split prepares for
future canonicalizations that must consider all memory accesses for deriving
additional beneficial transformations.
llvm-svn: 288479
Feasibility is checked late on its own but early it is hidden behind
the "PollyProcessUnprofitable" guard. This change will make sure we opt
out early if the runtime context is infeasible anyway.
llvm-svn: 288329
In '[DBG] Allow to emit the RTC value at runtime' the diagnostics were printed
without a newline at the end of each diagnostic. We add such a newline to
improve readability.
llvm-svn: 288323
Add an empty DeLICM pass, without any functional parts.
Extracting the boilerplate from the the functional part reduces the size of the
code to review (https://reviews.llvm.org/D24716)
Suggested-by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
llvm-svn: 288160
We now collect:
Number of total loops
Number of loops in scops
Number of scops
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 1
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 2
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 3
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 4
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 5
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 6 and larger
Number of loops in scops (profitable scops only)
Number of scops (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 1 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 2 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 3 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 4 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 5 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 6 and larger (profitable scops only)
These statistics are certainly completely accurate as we might drop scops
when building up their polyhedral representation, but they should give a good
indication of the number of scops we detect.
llvm-svn: 287973
Our original statistics were added before we introduced a more fine-grained
diagnostic system, but the granularity of our statistics has never been
increased accordingly. This change introduces now one statistic counter per
diagnostic to enable us to collect fine-grained statistics about who certain
scops are not detected. In case coarser grained statistics are needed, the
user is expected to combine counters manually.
llvm-svn: 287968
Reflect this correctly in the RejectReasonKind enum. The definition of
RejectReasonKind::IrreducibleRegion was introduced in r258497, when we started
to refuse regions containing irreducible loops.
llvm-svn: 287965
In r248118 some diagnostics for unstructured control flow have been removed,
but the corresponding RejectReasonKind was accidentally not removed. This
change removes it, as it is not needed any more.
llvm-svn: 287964
Introduce the new flag -polly-codegen-generate-expressions which forces Polly
to code generate AST expressions instead of using our SCEV based access
expression generation even for cases where the original memory access relation
was not changed and the SCEV based access expression could be code generated
without any issue.
This is an experimental option for better testing the isl ast expression
generation. The default behavior of Polly remains unchanged. We also exclude
a couple of cases for which the AST expression is not yet working.
llvm-svn: 287694
Drop instructions that do not influence the memory impact of a basic block.
They are not needed to reproduce the original bug (verified) and will cause
random test noise if we would decide to only model the instructions that
have visible side-effects.
llvm-svn: 287626
Add two store instructions at the end of basic blocks that are required to
reproduce the original bug to ensure we always process and model these basic
blocks. This makes this test case stable even in case we would decide to bail
out early of basic blocks which do not modify the global state. Also add
additional check lines to verify how we model the basic block.
llvm-svn: 287625
We add CHECK lines to this test case to make it easier to see the difference
between affine and non-affine memory accesses. We also change the test case to
use a parameteric index expression as otherwise our range analysis will
understand that the non-affine memory access can only access input[1],
which makes it difficult to see that the memory access is in-fact modeled as
non-affine access.
llvm-svn: 287623
Do not assume a load to be hoistable/invariant if the pointer is used by
another instruction in the SCoP that might write to memory and that is
always executed.
llvm-svn: 287272
The declaration as an "error block" is currently aggressive and not very
smart. This patch allows to disable error blocks completely. This might
be useful to prevent SCoP expansion to a point where the assumed context
becomes infeasible, thus the SCoP has to be discarded.
llvm-svn: 287271
Since we do not necessarily treat memory intrinsics as non-affine
anymore, we have to check for them explicitly before we try to hoist an
access.
llvm-svn: 287270
The new command line flag "polly-codegen-emit-rtc-print" can be used to
place a "printf" in the generated code that will print the RTC value and
the overflow state.
llvm-svn: 287265
In r286430 "SCEVValidator: add new parameters resulting from constant
extraction" we added functionality to scan for parameters after constant
extraction has taken place to ensure newly created parameters are correctly
registered. This addition made the already existing registration of parameters
redundant. Hence, we remove the corresponding call in this commit.
An alternative solution would have been to also perform constant extraction when
validating SCEV expressions and to then scan for parameters when validating
a SCEV expression. However, as SCEV validation is used during SCoP detection
where we want to be especially fast, adding additional functionality on this
hot path should be avoided if good alternatives exist. In this case, we can
choose to continue to only transform SCEV expression when actually modeling
them. As all transformations we perform are expected to not change the validity
of the SCEV expressions, this solution seems preferable.
Suggested-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286780
Commit r286294 introduced support for inaccessiblememonly and
inaccessiblemem_or_argmemonly attributes to BasicAA, which we need to
support to avoid undefined behavior. This change just refuses all calls
which are annotated with these attributes, which is conservatively correct.
In the future we may consider to model and support such function calls
in Polly.
llvm-svn: 286771
The validity of a branch condition must be verified at the location of the
branch (the branch instruction), not the location of the icmp that is
used in the branch instruction. When verifying at the wrong location, we
may accept an icmp that is defined within a loop which itself dominates, but
does not contain the branch instruction. Such loops cannot be modeled as
we only introduce domain dimensions for surrounding loops. To address this
problem we change the scop detection to evaluate and verify SCEV expressions at
the right location.
This issue has been around since at least r179148 "scop detection: properly
instantiate SCEVs to the place where they are used", where we explicitly
set the scope to the wrong location. Before this commit the scope
was not explicitly set, which probably also resulted in the scope around the
ICmp to be choosen.
This resolves http://llvm.org/PR30989
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286769
Assumptions can either be added for a given basic block, in which case the set
describing the assumptions is expected to match the dimensions of its domain.
In case no basic block is provided a parameter-only set is expected to describe
the assumption.
The piecewise expressions that are generated by the SCEVAffinator sometimes
have a zero-dimensional domain (e.g., [p] -> { [] : p <= -129 or p >= 128 }),
which looks similar to a parameter-only domain, but is still a set domain.
This change adds an assert that checks that we always pass parameter domains to
addAssumptions if BB is empty to make mismatches here fail early.
We also change visitTruncExpr to always convert to parameter sets, if BB is
null. This change resolves http://llvm.org/PR30941
Another alternative to this change would have been to inspect all code to make
sure we directly generate in the SCEV affinator parameter sets in case of empty
domains. However, this would likely complicate the code which combines parameter
and non-parameter domains when constructing a statement domain. We might still
consider doing this at some point, but as this likely requires several non-local
changes this should probably be done as a separate refactoring.
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286444
Providing the context to the ast generator allows for additional simplifcations
and -- more importantly -- allows to generate loops with only partially bounded
domains, assuming the domains are bounded for all parameter configurations
that are valid as defined by the context.
This change fixes the crash reported in http://llvm.org/PR30956
The original reason why we did not include the context when generating an
AST was that CLooG and later isl used to sometimes transfer some of the
constraints that bound the size of parameters from the context into the
generated AST. This resulted in operations with very large constants, which
sometimes introduced problematic integer overflows. The latest versions of
the isl AST generator are careful to not introduce such constants.
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286442
When extracting constant expressions out of SCEVs, new parameters may be
introduced, which have not been registered before. This change scans
SCEV expressions after constant extraction again to make sure newly
introduced parameters are registered.
We may for example extract the constant '8' from the expression '((8 * ((%a *
%b) + %c)) + (-8 * %a))' and obtain the expression '(((-1 + %b) * %a) + %c)'.
The new expression has a new parameter '(-1 + %b) * %a)', which was not
registered before, but must be registered to not crash.
This closes http://llvm.org/PR30953
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286430
In r248701 "Allow switch instructions in SCoPs" support for switch statements
has been introduced, but support for switch statements in loop latches was
incomplete. This change completely disables switch statements in loop latches.
The original commit changed addLoopBoundsToHeaderDomain to support non-branch
terminator instructions, but this change was incorrect: it added a check for
BI != null to the if-branch of a condition, but BI was used in the else branch
es well. As a result, when a non-branch terminator instruction is encounted a
nullptr dereference is triggered. Due to missing test coverage, this bug was
overlooked.
r249273 "[FIX] Approximate non-affine loops correctly" added code to disallow
switch statements for non-affine loops, if they appear in either a loop latch
or a loop exit. We adapt this code to now prohibit switch statements in
loop latches even if the control condition is affine.
We could possibly add support for switch statements in loop latches, but such
support should be evaluated and tested separately.
This fixes llvm.org/PR30952
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286426
Michael Kruse