Polly currently does not support irreducible control and it is probably not
worth supporting. This patch adds code that checks for irreducible control
and refuses regions containing irreducible control.
Polly traditionally had rather restrictive checks on the control flow structure
which would have refused irregular control, but within the last couple of months
most of the control flow restrictions have been removed. As part of this
generalization we accidentally allowed irregular control flow.
Contributed-by: Karthik Senthil and Ajith Pandel
llvm-svn: 258497
The test case we look at does not necessarily require irreducible control flow,
but a normal loop is sufficient to create a non-affine region containing more
than one basic block that dominates the exit node. We replace this irreducible
control flow with a normal loop for the following reasons:
1) This is easier to understand
2) We will subsequently commit a patch that ensures Polly does not process
irreducible control flow.
Within non-affine regions, we could possibly handle irreducible control flow.
llvm-svn: 258496
Polly recently got its own product in LLVM's bug tracker, which will make it
easier for people to file Polly bugs. This change updates the bugtracker links
on the Polly website.
llvm-svn: 258494
In Polly, after hoisting loop invariant loads outside loop, the alignment
information for hoisted loads are missing, this patch restore them.
Contributed-by: Lawrence Hu <lawrence@codeaurora.org>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16160
llvm-svn: 258105
When importing a schedule, do not verify the load/store alignment of
scalar accesses. Scalar loads/store are always created newly in code
generation with no alignment restrictions. Previously, scalar alignment
was checked if the access instruction happened to be a LoadInst or
StoreInst, but only its array (MK_Array) access is relevant.
This will be implicitly unit-tested when the access instruction of a
value read can be nullptr.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15680
llvm-svn: 257904
ISL 0.16 will change how sets are printed which breaks 117 unit tests
that text-compare printed sets. This patch re-formats most of these unit
tests using a script and small manual editing on top of that. When
actually updating ISL, most work is done by just re-running the script
to adapt to the changed output.
Some tests that compare IR and tests with single CHECK-lines that can be
easily updated manually are not included here.
The re-format script will also be committed afterwards. The per-test
formatter invocation command lines options will not be added in the near
future because it is ad hoc and would overwrite the manual edits.
Ideally it also shouldn't be required anymore because ISL's set printing
has become more stable in 0.16.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16095
llvm-svn: 257851
should perform loop interchanges itself.
This also fixes a bug we see due to the "loop-interchange" pass producing
incorrect IR when compiling linpack-pc.c from the LLVM test-suite with
"-polly-position=before-vectorizer".
Reviewed-by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
llvm-svn: 257495
Call assumeNoOutOfBound only in updateDimensionality to process situations
when new dimensions are added and new bounds checks are required.
Contributed-by: Tobias Grosser, Gareev Roman
llvm-svn: 257170
This change clarifies that for Not-NonAffine-SubRegions we actually iterate over
the subnodes and for both NonAffine-SubRegions and BasicBlocks, we perform the
schedule construction. As a result, the tree traversal becomes trivial, the
special case for a scop consisting just of a single non-affine region
disappears and the indentation of the code is reduced.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 256940
Providing an explicit PointerLikeTypeTraits implementation became necessary
since LLVM started in https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@256620
to automatically derive the pointer alignment from the pointer element type,
which does not work for incomplete types as used by isl. To ensure our code
still compiles, we provide an instantiation of PointerLikeTypeTraits for isl_id
which assumes no minimal alignment. isl pointers are likely to have a "higher"
alignment. We can exploit this later in case this becomes performance relevant.
llvm-svn: 256650
At code generation, scalar reads are generated before the other
statement's instructions, respectively scalar writes after them, in
contrast to array accesses which are "executed" with the instructions
they are linked to. Therefore it makes sense to not map the scalar
accesses to a place of execution. Follow-up patches will also remove
some of the directs links from a scalar access to a single instruction,
such that only having array accesses in InstructionToAccess ensures
consistency.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13676
llvm-svn: 256298
We clarify that certain code is only executed if LSchedule is != nullptr.
Previously some of these functions have been executed, but they only passed
a nullptr through. This caused some confusion when reading the code.
llvm-svn: 256209
Besides improving the documentation and the code we now assert in case the input
is invalid (N < 0) and also do not any more return a nullptr in case USet is
empty. This should make the code more readable.
llvm-svn: 256208
If a loop has a sufficiently large amount of compute instruction in its loop
body, it is unlikely that our rewrite of the loop iterators introduces large
performance changes. As Polly can also apply beneficical optimizations (such
as parallelization) to such loop nests, we mark them as profitable.
This option is currently "disabled" by default, but can be used to run
experiments. If enabled by setting it e.g. to 40 instructions, we currently
see some compile-time increases on LNT without any significant run-time
changes.
llvm-svn: 256199
.. and add some documentation. We also simplify the code by dropping an early
check that is also covered by the the later checks. This might have a small
compile time impact, but as the scops that are skipped are small we should
probably only add this back in the unlikely case that this has a notable
compile-time cost.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 256149
As we already log an error when calling invalid, scops unprofitable scops are in
any case marked invalid, but returning immediately safes (a tiny bit of) compile
time and is consistent with our use of 'invalid' in the remainder of the file.
Found by inspection.
llvm-svn: 256140
Without this return we still log the incorrect array size (and do not detect
this scop), but we would unnecessarily continue to verify that access functions
are affine. As we do not need to do this, we can return right ahead and
consequently safe compile time.
This issue was found by inspection.
llvm-svn: 256139
Instead of counting all array memory accesses associated with a load
instruction, we now explicitly check that the single array access that could
(potentially) be associated with a load instruction does not exist. This helps
to document the current behavior of Polly where load instructions can indeed
have at most one associated array access. In the unlikely case this changes
in the future, we add an assert for the case where two load accesses would
prevent us to return a single memory access, but we still should communicate
that not all array memory accesses have been removed.
This addresses post-commit comments from Johannes Doerfert for commit 255776.
llvm-svn: 256136
Scops that contain many complex branches are likely to result in complex domain
conditions that consist of a large (> 100) number of conjucts. Transforming
such domains is expensive and unlikely to result in efficient code. To avoid
long compile times we detect this case and skip such scops. In the future we may
improve this by either using non-affine subregions to hide such complex
condition structures or by exploiting in certain cases properties (e.g.,
dominance) that allow us to construct the domains of a scop in a way that
results in a smaller number improving conjuncts.
Example of a code that results in complex iteration spaces:
loop.header
/ | \ \
A0 A2 A4 \
\ / \ / \
A1 A3 \
/ \ / \ |
B0 B2 B4 |
\ / \ / |
B1 B3 ^
/ \ / \ |
C0 C2 C4 |
\ / \ / /
C1 C3 /
\ / /
loop backedge
llvm-svn: 256123
The patch fixes Bug 25759 produced by inappropriate handling of unsigned
maximum SCEV expressions by SCEVRemoveMax. Without a fix, we get an infinite
loop and a segmentation fault, if we try to process, for example,
'((-1 + (-1 * %b1)) umax {(-1 + (-1 * %yStart)),+,-1}<%.preheader>)'.
It also fixes a potential issue related to signed maximum SCEV expressions.
Tested-by: Roman Gareev <gareevroman@gmail.com>
Fixed-by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15563
llvm-svn: 255922
When running 'clang -O3 -mllvm -polly -mllvm -polly-show' we now only show the
CFGs of functions with at least one detected scop. For larger files/projects
this reduces the number of graphs printed significantly and is likely what
developers want to see. The new option -polly-view-all enforces all graphs to be
printed and the exiting option -poll-view-only limites the graph printing to
functions that match a certain pattern.
This patch requires https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@255889 (and
vice versa) to compile correctly.
llvm-svn: 255891
Load instructions may possibly be related to multiple memory accesses, but we
are only interested in the array read access that describes the memory location
the load instructions loads from. By using getArrayAccessfor we ensure to always
obtain the right memory access.
This issue was found by inspection without having a failing test case.
llvm-svn: 255716
getAccessFor does not guarantee a certain access to be returned in case an
instruction is related to multiple accesses. However, in the vector code
generation we want to know the stride of the array access of a store
instruction. By using getArrayAccessFor we ensure we always get the correct
memory access.
This patch fixes a potential bug, but I was unable to produce a failing test
case. Several existing test cases cover this code, but all of them already
passed out of luck (or the specific but not-guaranteed order in which we build
memory accesses).
llvm-svn: 255715
When generating scalar loads/stores separately the vector code has not been
updated. This commit adds code to generate scalar loads for vector code as well
as code to assert in case scalar stores are encountered within a vector loop.
llvm-svn: 255714
When rewriting the access functions of load/store statements, we are only
interested in the actual array memory location. The current code just took
the very first memory access, which could be a scalar or an array access. As
a result, we failed to update access functions even though this was requested
via .jscop.
llvm-svn: 255713
Tobias Grosser