This fixes most references to the paths:
llvm.org/svn/
llvm.org/git/
llvm.org/viewvc/
github.com/llvm-mirror/
github.com/llvm-project/
reviews.llvm.org/diffusion/
to instead point to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.
This is *not* a trivial substitution, because additionally, all the
checkout instructions had to be migrated to instruct users on how to
use the monorepo layout, setting LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS instead of
checking out various projects into various subdirectories.
I've attempted to not change any scripts here, only documentation. The
scripts will have to be addressed separately.
Additionally, I've deleted one document which appeared to be outdated
and unneeded:
lldb/docs/building-with-debug-llvm.txt
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57330
llvm-svn: 352514
Summary:
The `Acronyms` and `IncludeDefaultAcronyms` options were deprecated in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51832. These options can be removed.
Tested by running the clang-tidy tests.
Reviewers: benhamilton, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56945
llvm-svn: 351921
Otherwise we don't warn on a struct containing a single public int, but
we warn on a struct containing a single public std::string, which is
inconsistent.
llvm-svn: 351686
Summary:
The documentation for this clang-checker did not explain what the options are. But this checkers only works with at least some options defined.
To discover the options, you have to read the source code. This shouldn't be necessary for users who just have access to the clang-tidy binary.
This revision, explains the options and gives an example.
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: JonasToth, Eugene.Zelenko
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56563
llvm-svn: 351261
Summary: Adds a checker to clang-tidy to warn when a non void const member function, taking only parameters passed by value or const reference could be marked as '[[nodiscard]]'
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: alexfh, stephenkelly, curdeius, aaron.ballman, hokein, JonasToth
Reviewed By: curdeius, JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, lefticus, lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55433
llvm-svn: 350760
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g.
modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on client code where the macro
is provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewed By: JonasToth, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56025
llvm-svn: 350056
Summary:
This check uses the context of a subtraction expression as well as knowledge
about the Abseil Time types, to infer the type of the second operand of some
subtraction expressions in Duration conversions. For example:
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(duration) - foo
can become
absl::ToDoubleSeconds(duration - absl::Seconds(foo))
This ensures that time calculations are done in the proper domain, and also
makes it easier to further deduce the types of the second operands to these
expressions.
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55245
llvm-svn: 349073
Patch by Alex Strelnikov.
Reviewed as D53830
Introduce a new check to upgrade user code based on upcoming API breaking changes to absl::Duration.
The check finds calls to arithmetic operators and factory functions for absl::Duration that rely on
an implicit user defined conversion to int64_t. These cases will no longer compile after proposed
changes are released. Suggested fixes explicitly cast the argument int64_t.
llvm-svn: 348633
Summary:
Implement a check for detecting if/else if/else chains where two or more
branches are Type I clones of each other (that is, they contain identical code)
and for detecting switch statements where two or more consecutive branches are
Type I clones of each other.
Patch by donat.nagy.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: MTC, lebedev.ri, whisperity, xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54757
llvm-svn: 348343
Summary:
§1 Description
This changes the objc-property-declaration check to allow arbitrary acronyms and initialisms instead of using whitelisted acronyms. In Objective-C it is relatively common to use project prefixes in property names for the purposes of disambiguation. For example, the CIColor¹ and CGColor² properties on UIColor both represent symbol prefixes being used in proeprty names outside of Apple's accepted acronyms³. The union of Apple's accepted acronyms and all symbol prefixes that might be used for disambiguation in property declarations effectively allows for any arbitrary sequence of capital alphanumeric characters to be acceptable in property declarations. This change updates the check accordingly.
The test variants with custom configurations are deleted as part of this change because their configurations no longer impact behavior. The acronym configurations are currently preserved for backwards compatibility of check configuration.
[1] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uicolor/1621951-cicolor?language=objc
[2] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uicolor/1621954-cgcolor?language=objc
[3] https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CodingGuidelines/Articles/APIAbbreviations.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/20001285-BCIHCGAE
§2 Test Notes
Changes verified by:
• Running clang-tidy unit tests.
• Used check_clang_tidy.py to verify expected output of processing objc-property-declaration.m
Reviewers: benhamilton, Wizard
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: jfb, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51832
llvm-svn: 348331
Summary:
This check finds instances where Duration values are being converted to a numeric value in a comparison expression, and suggests that the conversion happen on the other side of the expression to a Duration. See documentation for examples.
This also shuffles some code around so that the new check may perform in sone step simplifications also caught by other checks.
Compilation is unbroken, because the hash-function is now directly
specified for std::unordered_map, as 'enum class' does not compile as
key (seamingly only on some compilers).
Patch by hwright.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth, alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: sammccall, Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, mgorny
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54737
llvm-svn: 348169
Summary:
This check finds instances where Duration values are being converted to a numeric value in a comparison expression, and suggests that the conversion happen on the other side of the expression to a Duration. See documentation for examples.
This also shuffles some code around so that the new check may perform in sone step simplifications also caught by other checks.
Patch by hwright.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth, alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: sammccall, Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, mgorny
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54737
llvm-svn: 348161
Summary: There is no ambiguity / information loss in this conversion
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54941
llvm-svn: 347671
Summary:
§1 Description
This check finds function names in function declarations in Objective-C files that do not follow the naming pattern described in the Google Objective-C Style Guide. Function names should be in UpperCamelCase and functions that are not of static storage class should have an appropriate prefix as described in the Google Objective-C Style Guide. The function `main` is a notable exception. Function declarations in expansions in system headers are ignored.
Example conforming function definitions:
```
static bool IsPositive(int i) { return i > 0; }
static bool ABIsPositive(int i) { return i > 0; }
bool ABIsNegative(int i) { return i < 0; }
```
A fixit hint is generated for functions of static storage class but otherwise the check does not generate a fixit hint because an appropriate prefix for the function cannot be determined.
§2 Test Notes
* Verified clang-tidy tests pass successfully.
* Used check_clang_tidy.py to verify expected output of processing google-objc-function-naming.m
Reviewers: benhamilton, hokein, Wizard, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51575
llvm-svn: 347132
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39224 | PR39224 ]]
As discussed, we can't always do the transform automatically due to that array-to-pointer decay of C array.
In order to detect whether we can do said transform, we'd need to be able to see all usages of said array,
which is, i would say, rather impossible if e.g. it is in the header.
Thus right now no fixit exists.
Exceptions: `extern "C"` code.
References:
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#es27-use-stdarray-or-stack_array-for-arrays-on-the-stack | CPPCG ES.27: Use std::array or stack_array for arrays on the stack ]]
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon1-prefer-using-stl-array-or-vector-instead-of-a-c-array | CPPCG SL.con.1: Prefer using STL array or vector instead of a C array ]]
* HICPP `4.1.1 Ensure that a function argument does not undergo an array-to-pointer conversion`
* MISRA `5-2-12 An identifier with array type passed as a function argument shall not decay to a pointer`
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth, alexfh, hokein, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53771
llvm-svn: 346835
The new checker searches for those for loops which has a loop variable with a "too small" type which means this type can't represent all values which are part of the iteration range.
For example:
```
int main() {
long size = 300000;
for( short int i = 0; i < size; ++i) {}
}
```
The short type leads to infinite loop here because it can't store all values in the `[0..size]` interval. In a real use case, size means a container's size which depends on the user input. Which means for small amount of objects the algorithm works, but with a larger user input the software will freeze.
The idea of the checker comes from the LibreOffice project, where the same check was implemented as a clang compiler plugin, called `LoopVarTooSmall` (LLVM licensed).
The idea is the same behind this check, but the code is different because of the different framework.
Patch by ztamas.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, JonasToth, xazax.hun, whisperity
Reviewed By: JonasToth, whisperity
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53974
llvm-svn: 346665
This check flags function top-level const-qualified return types and suggests removing the mostly-superfluous const qualifier where possible.
Patch by Yitzhak Mandelbaum.
llvm-svn: 345764
Summary:
This patch introduces a new clang-tidy check that matches on all `declStmt` that declare more then one variable
and transform them into one statement per declaration if possible.
It currently only focusses on variable declarations but should be extended to cover more kinds of declarations in the future.
It is related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D27621 and does use it's extensive test-suite. Thank you to firolino for his work!
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, kbobyrev
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: ZaMaZaN4iK, mgehre, nemanjai, kbarton, lebedev.ri, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51949
llvm-svn: 345735
Summary:
The macro may not have location (or more generally, the location may not exist),
e.g. if it originates from compiler's command-line.
The check complains on all the macros, even those without the location info.
Which means, it only says it does not like it. What is 'it'? I have no idea.
If we don't print the name, then there is no way to deal with that situation.
And in general, not printing name here forces the user to try to understand,
given, the macro definition location, what is the macro name?
This isn't fun.
Also, ignores-by-default the macros originating from command-line,
with an option to not ignore those.
I suspect some more issues may crop up later.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, hokein, xazax.hun, alexfh
Reviewed By: JonasToth, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53817
llvm-svn: 345610
Hyrum Wright