It's been pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D47646 that lldb-test
fails to create a usable process on Windows when running this test.
llvm-svn: 333785
This adds a new command to the ir-memory-map tester:
free <allocation-index>
The argument to free is an index which identifies which live allocation
to free. Index 0 identifies the first live allocation in the address
space, index 1 identifies the second, etc. where the allocations are
sorted in increasing order.
For illustrative purposes, assume malloc returns monotonically
increasing addresses. Here are some examples of how free would work:
Example 1
---------
malloc 16 1
malloc 32 1
free 1 //< Free the 32-byte allocation.
free 0 //< Next, free the 16-byte allocation.
Example 2
---------
malloc 16 1
malloc 32 1
free 0 //< Free the 16-byte allocation.
free 0 //< Next, free the 32-byte allocation.
llvm-svn: 333700
r333583 introduced testing for IRMemoryMap's process-side allocations
(eAllocationPolicyProcessOnly). This adds support for the host-side
variety (eAllocationPolicyHostOnly).
llvm-svn: 333698
This prevents Malloc from allocating the same chunk of memory twice, as
a byproduct of an alignment adjustment which gave the client access to
unallocated memory.
Prior to this patch, the newly-added test failed with:
$ lldb-test ir-memory-map ... ir-memory-map-overlap1.test
...
Command: malloc(size=64, alignment=32)
Malloc: address = 0x1000cd080
Command: malloc(size=64, alignment=8)
Malloc: address = 0x1000cd0b0
Malloc error: overlapping allocation detected, previous allocation at [0x1000cd080, 0x1000cd0c0)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47551
llvm-svn: 333697
This teaches lldb-test how to launch a process, set up an IRMemoryMap,
and issue memory allocations in the target process through the map. This
makes it possible to test IRMemoryMap in a targeted way.
This has uncovered two bugs so far. The first bug is that Malloc
performs an adjustment on the pointer returned from AllocateMemory (for
alignment purposes) which ultimately allows overlapping memory regions
to be created. The second bug is that after most of the address space on
the host side is exhausted, Malloc may return the same address multiple
times. These bugs (and hopefully more!) can be uncovered and tested for
with targeted lldb-test commands.
At an even higher level, the motivation for addressing these bugs is
that they can lead to strange user-visible failures (e.g, variables
assume the wrong value during expression evaluation, or the debugger
crashes). See my third comment on this swift-lldb PR for an example:
https://github.com/apple/swift-lldb/pull/652
I hope lldb-test is the right place to add this testing harness. Setting
up a gtest-style unit test proved too cumbersome (you need to recreate
or mock way too much debugger state), as did writing end-to-end tests
(it's hard to write a test that actually hits a buggy path).
With lldb-test, it's easy to read/generate the test input and parse the
test output. I'll attach a simple "fuzz" tester which generates failing
test cases to the Phab review. Here's an example:
```
Command: malloc(size=1024, alignment=32)
Malloc: address = 0xca000
Command: malloc(size=64, alignment=16)
Malloc: address = 0xca400
Command: malloc(size=1024, alignment=16)
Malloc: address = 0xca440
Command: malloc(size=16, alignment=8)
Malloc: address = 0xca840
Command: malloc(size=2048, alignment=16)
Malloc: address = 0xcb000
Command: malloc(size=64, alignment=32)
Malloc: address = 0xca860
Command: malloc(size=1024, alignment=16)
Malloc: address = 0xca890
Malloc error: overlapping allocation detected, previous allocation at [0xca860, 0xca8a0)
```
{F6288839}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47508
llvm-svn: 333583
Vedant Kumar