'__is_literal' type trait for GCC compatibility. At least one relased
version if libstdc++ uses this name for the trait despite it not being
documented anywhere.
llvm-svn: 130078
This introduces a few APIs on the AST to bundle up the standard-based
logic so that programmatic clients have access to exactly the same
behavior.
There is only one serious FIXME here: checking for non-trivial move
constructors and move assignment operators. Those bits need to be added
to the declaration and accessors provided.
This implementation should be enough for the uses of __is_trivial in
libstdc++ 4.6's C++98 library implementation.
Ideas for more thorough test cases or any edge cases missing would be
appreciated. =D
llvm-svn: 130057
AttributeLists do not accumulate over the lifetime of parsing, but are
instead reused. Also make the arguments array not require a separate
allocation, and make availability attributes store their stuff in
augmented memory, too.
llvm-svn: 128209
Change the interface to expose the new information and deal with the enormous fallout.
Introduce the new ExceptionSpecificationType value EST_DynamicNone to more easily deal with empty throw specifications.
Update the tests for noexcept and fix the various bugs uncovered, such as lack of tentative parsing support.
llvm-svn: 127537
template specialization types. This also required some parser tweaks,
since we were losing track of the nested-name-specifier's source
location information in several places in the parser. Other notable
changes this required:
- Sema::ActOnTagTemplateIdType now type-checks and forms the
appropriate type nodes (+ source-location information) for an
elaborated-type-specifier ending in a template-id. Previously, we
used a combination of ActOnTemplateIdType and
ActOnTagTemplateIdType that resulted in an ElaboratedType wrapped
around a DependentTemplateSpecializationType, which duplicated the
keyword ("class", "struct", etc.) and nested-name-specifier
storage.
- Sema::ActOnTemplateIdType now gets a nested-name-specifier, which
it places into the returned type-source location information.
- Sema::ActOnDependentTag now creates types with source-location
information.
llvm-svn: 126808
semantics after the C++0x is_convertible type trait. This
implementation is not 100% complete, because it allows access errors
to be hard errors (rather than just evaluating false).
Original patch by Steven Watanabe!
llvm-svn: 124425
involving rvalue references, to start scoping out what is and what
isn't implemented. In the process, tweak some standards citations,
type desugaring, and teach the tentative parser about && in
ptr-operator.
llvm-svn: 123913
parameter packs (C++0x [dcl.fct]p13), including disambiguation between
unnamed function parameter packs and varargs (C++0x [dcl.fct]p14) for
cases like
void f(T...)
where T may or may not contain unexpanded parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 122520
disambiguate between an expression (for a bit-field width) and a type
(for a fixed underlying type). Since the disambiguation can be
expensive (due to tentative parsing), we perform a simplistic
disambiguation based on one-token lookahead before going into the
full-blown tentative parsing. Based on a patch by Daniel Wallin.
llvm-svn: 120582
sends. These are far trickier than instance messages, because we
typically have something like
NSArray alloc]
where it appears to be a declaration of a variable named "alloc" up
until we see the ']' (or a ':'), and at that point we can't backtrace.
So, we use a combination of syntactic and semantic disambiguation to
treat this as a message send only when the type is an Objective-C type
and it has the syntax of a class message send (which would otherwise
be ill-formed).
llvm-svn: 114057
- move DeclSpec &c into the Sema library
- move ParseAST into the Parse library
Reflect this change in a thousand different includes.
Reflect this change in the link orders.
llvm-svn: 111667
parser is looking at a declaration or an expression, use a '=' to
conclude that we are parsing a declaration.
This is wrong. However, our previous approach of finding a comma after
the '=' is also wrong, because the ',' could be part of a
template-argument-list. So, for now we're going to use the same wrong
heuristic as GCC and Visual C++, because less real-world code is
likely to be broken this way. I've opened PR7655 to keep track of our
wrongness; note also the XFAIL'd test.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8193163>.
llvm-svn: 108459
propagating error conditions out of the various annotate-me-a-snowflake
routines. Generally (but not universally) removes redundant diagnostics
as well as, you know, not crashing on bad code. On the other hand,
I have just signed myself up to fix fiddly parser errors for the next
week. Again.
llvm-svn: 97221
The following attributes are currently supported in C++0x attribute
lists (and in GNU ones as well):
- align() - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations and what entities it may apply to
- final - semantics believed to be conformant to CWG issue 817's proposed
wording, except for redeclarations
- noreturn - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations
- carries_dependency - currently ignored (this is an optimization hint)
llvm-svn: 89543
their members, including member class template, member function
templates, and member classes and functions of member templates.
To actually parse the nested-name-specifiers that qualify the name of
an out-of-line definition of a member template, e.g.,
template<typename X> template<typename Y>
X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::foo(Y) {
return X();
}
we need to look for the template names (e.g., "Inner1") as a member of
the current instantiation (Outer<X>), even before we have entered the
scope of the current instantiation. Since we can't do this in general
(i.e., we should not be looking into all dependent
nested-name-specifiers as if they were the current instantiation), we
rely on the parser to tell us when it is parsing a declaration
specifier sequence, and, therefore, when we should consider the
current scope specifier to be a current instantiation.
Printing of complicated, dependent nested-name-specifiers may be
somewhat broken by this commit; I'll add tests for this issue and fix
the problem (if it still exists) in a subsequent commit.
llvm-svn: 80044
a paren expression without considering the context past the parentheses.
Behold:
(T())x; - type-id
(T())*x; - type-id
(T())/x; - expression
(T()); - expression
llvm-svn: 72260
instantiation for C++ typename-specifiers such as
typename T::type
The parsing of typename-specifiers is relatively easy thanks to
annotation tokens. When we see the "typename", we parse the
typename-specifier and produce a typename annotation token. There are
only a few places where we need to handle this. We currently parse the
typename-specifier form that terminates in an identifier, but not the
simple-template-id form, e.g.,
typename T::template apply<U, V>
Parsing of nested-name-specifiers has a similar problem, since at this
point we don't have any representation of a class template
specialization whose template-name is unknown.
Semantic analysis is only partially complete, with some support for
template instantiation that works for simple examples.
llvm-svn: 67875
disambiguation contexts, so that we properly parse template arguments
such as
A<int()>
as type-ids rather than as expressions. Since this can be confusing
(especially when the template parameter is a non-type template
parameter), we try to give a friendly error message.
Almost, eliminate a redundant error message (that should have been a
note) and add some ultra-basic checks for non-type template
arguments.
llvm-svn: 64189
.def file for each library. This means that adding a diagnostic
to sema doesn't require all the other libraries to be rebuilt.
Patch by Anders Johnsen!
llvm-svn: 63111
Francois Pichet