Remove the failing tests for __fixunssfdi() and __fixunsdfdi() that
relied on undefined (and most likely obsolete in terms of compiler-rt
implementation behavior).
Both tests presumed that 0x1.p+64 would be converted to
0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFLL, that is the largest value in uint64 range.
However, the C/C++ standards do not specify the behavior for converting
a floating-point value to an integer of smaller range, and in this case
both libgcc and compiler-rt implementations return 0 instead.
Since the current behavior is correct with regards to standards
and there is no good way of expressing 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFLL in single-
or double-precision float, I've removed the failing test altogether.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28146
llvm-svn: 292257
Update SOVERSION to use just the major version number rather than
major+minor, to match the new versioning scheme where only major is used
to indicate API/ABI version.
Since two-digit SOVERSIONs were introduced post 3.9 branching, this
change does not risk any SOVERSION collisions. In the past,
two-component X.Y SOVERSIONs were shortly used but those will not
interfere with the new ones since the new versions start at 4.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28730
llvm-svn: 292255
If a memory instruction will be vectorized, but it's pointer operand is
non-consecutive-like, the instruction is a gather or scatter operation. Its
pointer operand will be non-uniform. This should fix PR31671.
Reference: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31671
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28819
llvm-svn: 292254
Making this variable non-static avoids the need for locking to ensure
that the initialization is thread-safe which in turns eliminates the
runtime dependency on libc++abi library (for __cxa_guard_acquire and
__cxa_guard_release) which makes it possible to link scudo against
pure C programs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28757
llvm-svn: 292253
other test cases.
Summary: Refactor out LoopInfo computation so that it can be
used by other test cases.
So i am changing this test proactively for later commit, which will use
this function.
Reviewers: sanjoy, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28778
llvm-svn: 292250
Summary:
Python bindings cannot support Python 3 without work being done to fix Unicode c-string conversion.
This was attempted in https://reviews.llvm.org/D26082. That patch was reverted due to memory access issues on Linux.
This revision fixes enough language compatibility issues for the clang module to be loaded and raise an error if the Python version is not 2.
Reviewers: mgorny, MathieuDuponchelle, rengolin, compnerd
Reviewed By: compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28682
llvm-svn: 292247
r292188 confused MSVC because of the combined lack of a default
case and return statement.
Move the unreachable outside of the NumLibFuncs case, to make it
obvious that all cases should be handled.
llvm_unreachable is __declspec(noreturn), so I'm assuming this
does appease MSVC.
llvm-svn: 292246
CheckDesignatedInitializer wasn't taking into account the base classes
when computing the index for the field in the derived class, which
caused the test case to crash during IRGen because of a malformed AST.
rdar://problem/26795040
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28705
llvm-svn: 292245
Even with the fix from r291630, this still causes problems. I get
widespread assertion failures in the Swift runtime's WeakRefCount::increment()
function. I sent a reduced testcase in reply to the commit.
llvm-svn: 292242
runnig LCSSA over them prior to running the loop pipeline.
This also teaches the loop PM to verify that LCSSA form is preserved
throughout the pipeline's run across the loop nest.
Most of the test updates just leverage this new functionality. One has to be
relaxed with the new PM as IVUsers is less powerful when it sees LCSSA input.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28743
llvm-svn: 292241
Summary: This copies over some functionality we have in ELF/Error.{cpp,h} and makes it available in COFF/Error.{cpp,h}
Reviewers: pcc, rafael, ruiu
Subscribers:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28692
llvm-svn: 292240
Also, add the corresponding match to the AssumptionCache's 'Affected Values' list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28485
llvm-svn: 292239
Running lit tests and unit tests of ASan and TSan on macOS has very bad performance when running with a high number of threads. This is caused by xnu (the macOS kernel), which currently doesn't handle mapping and unmapping of sanitizer shadow regions (reserved VM which are several terabytes large) very well. The situation is so bad that increasing the number of threads actually makes the total testing time larger. The macOS buildbots are affected by this. Note that we can't easily limit the number of sanitizer testing threads without affecting the rest of the tests.
This patch adds a special "group" into lit, and limits the number of concurrently running tests in this group. This helps solve the contention problem, while still allowing other tests to run in full, that means running lit with -j8 will still with 8 threads, and parallelism is only limited in sanitizer tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28420
llvm-svn: 292232
Running lit tests and unit tests of ASan and TSan on macOS has very bad performance when running with a high number of threads. This is caused by xnu (the macOS kernel), which currently doesn't handle mapping and unmapping of sanitizer shadow regions (reserved VM which are several terabytes large) very well. The situation is so bad that increasing the number of threads actually makes the total testing time larger. The macOS buildbots are affected by this. Note that we can't easily limit the number of sanitizer testing threads without affecting the rest of the tests.
This patch adds a special "group" into lit, and limits the number of concurrently running tests in this group. This helps solve the contention problem, while still allowing other tests to run in full, that means running lit with -j8 will still with 8 threads, and parallelism is only limited in sanitizer tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28420
llvm-svn: 292231
D28684 changed llvm::zlib to return Error instead of Status.
It was accepted and committed in r292214, but then reverted in r292217
because I missed that clang code also needs to be updated.
Patch do that.
D28684 recommitted again as r292226
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28807
llvm-svn: 292227
No any changes, will follow up with D28807 commit containing APLi change for clang
to fix build issues happened.
Original commit message:
[Support/Compression] - Change zlib API to return Error instead of custom status.
Previously API returned custom enum values.
Patch changes it to return Error with string description.
That should help users to report errors in universal way.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28684
llvm-svn: 292226
Summary:
Tests under tools/llvm-objdump should not use inputs from Object. Copied the
required inputs and aligned the new tests to be more consistent with the existing
tests in this respect.
Reviewers: ioeric
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: davide, djasper, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28799
llvm-svn: 292222
Inputs shown in that testcase previously created
a huge temporarily file under 32 bits.
It was fixed by D28107. During review was suggested to
add a testcase even without CHECKs for documentation purposes.
Patch do that.
llvm-svn: 292220
Patch changes behavior to not try open the output
file if we already know about error.
That is not just cleaner, but also fixes nasty behavior of linker that
could create huge temporarily files under certain conditions.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28107
llvm-svn: 292219
Previously API returned custom enum values.
Patch changes it to return Error with string description.
That should help users to report errors in universal way.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28684
llvm-svn: 292214
Summary:
Instead of forbidding such access functions completely, we verify that their
base pointer has been hoisted and only assert in case the base pointer was
not hoisted.
I was trying for a little while to get a test case that ensures the assert is
correctly fired in case of invariant load hoisting being disabled, but I could
not find a good way to do so, as llvm-lit immediately aborts if a command
yields a non-zero return value. As we do not generally test our asserts,
not having a test case here seems OK.
This resolves http://llvm.org/PR31494
Suggested-by: Michael Kruse <llvm@meinersbur.de>
Reviewers: efriedma, jdoerfert, Meinersbur, gareevroman, sebpop, zinob, huihuiz, pollydev
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28798
llvm-svn: 292213
Summary:
The NDK cmake toolchain file defines CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=Android, so switch the
build to use that. I have also updated the in-tree toolchain file to do that
(instead of defining __ANDROID_NDK__), so it can still be used to build.
After migrating the last bits of non-toolchainy bits out of the in-tree
toolchain, I intend to delete it.
Reviewers: tberghammer, danalbert
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28775
llvm-svn: 292212
Summary:
Testing of XRay was occasionally disabled on 32-bit Arm targets (someone assumed that XRay was supported on 64-bit targets only). This patch should fix that problem. Also here the instruction&data cache incoherency problem is fixed, because it may be causing a test to fail.
This patch is one of a series: see also
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D28624
Reviewers: dberris, rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson, rengolin, dberris, iid_iunknown
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28623
llvm-svn: 292211
Summary:
Emission of XRay table was occasionally disabled for Arm32, but this bug was not then detected because earlier (also by mistake) testing of XRay was occasionally disabled on 32-bit Arm targets. This patch should fix that problem and detect such problems in the future.
This patch is one of a series, see also
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D28623
Reviewers: rengolin, dberris
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson, rengolin, dberris, iid_iunknown
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28624
llvm-svn: 292210
Sanjay Patel