As our delinearization works optimistically, we need in some cases run-time
checks that verify our optimistic assumptions. A simple example is the
following code:
void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < 150; j++)
for (long k = 0; k < 200; k++)
A[i][j][k] = 1.0;
}
After clang linearized the access to A and we delinearized it again to
A[i][j][k] we need to ensure that we do not access the delinearized array
out of bounds (this information is not available in LLVM-IR). Hence, we
need to verify the following constraints at run-time:
CHECK: Assumed Context:
CHECK: [o, m] -> { : m >= 150 and o >= 200 }
llvm-svn: 212198
This change is particularly useful in the code generation as we need
to know which binary operator/identity element we need to combine/initialize
the privatization locations.
+ Print the reduction type for each memory access
+ Adjusted the test cases to comply with the new output format and
to test for the right reduction type
llvm-svn: 212126
Iterate over all store memory accesses and check for valid binary reduction
candidate loads by following the operands of the stored value. For each
candidate pair we check if they have the same base address and there are no
other accesses which may overlap with them. This ensures that no intermediate
value can escape into other memory locations or is overwritten at some point.
+ 17 test cases for reduction detection and reduction dependency modeling
llvm-svn: 211957
Due to bad habit we sometimes used a variable %defaultOpts that listed
a set of passes commonly run to prepare for Polly. None of these test cases
actually needs special preparation and only two of them need the 'basicaa' to
be scheduled. Scheduling the required alias analysis explicitly makes the test
cases clearer.
llvm-svn: 211671
We had a set of test cases that have been incomplete and XFAILED. This patch
completes a couple of the interesting ones and removes the ones which seem
redundant or not sufficiently reduced to be useful.
llvm-svn: 211670
We do this currently only for test cases where we have integer offsets that
clearly access array dimensions out-of-bound.
-; for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
-; for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
-; for (long k = 0; k < o; k++)
+; for (long i = 0; i < n - 3; i++)
+; for (long j = 4; j < m; j++)
+; for (long k = 0; k < o - 7; k++)
; A[i+3][j-4][k+7] = 1.0;
This will be helpful if we later want to simplify the access functions under the
assumption that they do not access memory out of bounds.
llvm-svn: 210179
Without this patch, the testcase would fail on the delinearization of the second
array:
; void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
; for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
; for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
; for (long k = 0; k < o; k++) {
; A[i+3][j-4][k+7] = 1.0;
; A[i][0][k] = 2.0;
; }
; }
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[3 + i0, -4 + i1, 7 + i2] };
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
Here is the output of FileCheck on the testcase without this patch:
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
^
<stdin>:26:2: note: possible intended match here
[n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[o0] };
^
It is possible to find a good delinearization for A[i][0][k] only in the context
of the delinearization of both array accesses.
There are two ways to delinearize together all array subscripts touching the
same base address: either duplicate the code from scop detection to first gather
all array references and then run the delinearization; or as implemented in this
patch, use the same delinearization info that we computed during scop detection.
llvm-svn: 210117
We do not have a use for this information at the moment. If we need this at some
point, the "instruction -> access" mapping needs to be enhanced as a single
instruction could then possibly perform multiple accesses.
This patch allows us to build the polyhedral information for scops with scalar
dependences.
llvm-svn: 201815
In rare cases the modification of one scop can effect the validity of other
scops, as code generation of an earlier scop may make the scalar evolution
functions derived for later scops less precise. The example that triggered this
patch was a scop that contained an 'or' expression as follows:
%add13710 = or i32 %j.19, 1
--> {(1 + (4 * %l)),+,2}<nsw><%for.body81>
Scev could only analyze the 'or' as it knew %j.19 is a multiple of 2. This
information was not available after the first scop was code generated (or
independent-blocks was run on it) and SCEV could not derive a precise SCEV
expression any more. This means we could not any more code generate this SCoP.
My current understanding is that there is always the risk that an earlier code
generation change invalidates later scops. As the example we have seen here is
difficult to avoid, we use this occasion to guard us against all such
invalidations.
This patch "solves" this issue by verifying right before we start working on
a detected scop, if this scop is in fact still valid. This adds a certain
overhead. However the verification we run is anyways very fast and secondly
it is only run on detected scops. So the overhead should not be very large. As
a later optimization we could detect scops only on demand, such that we need
to run scop-detections always only a single time.
This should fix the single last failure in the LLVM test-suite for the new
scev-based code generation.
llvm-svn: 201593
SCoP invariant parameters with the different start value would deter parameter
sharing. For example, when compiling the following C code:
void foo(float *input) {
for (long j = 0; j < 8; j++) {
// SCoP begin
for (long i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
float x = input[j * 64 + i + 1];
input[j * 64 + i] = x * x;
}
}
}
Polly would creat two parameters for these memory accesses:
p_0: {0,+,256}
p_2: {4,+,256}
[j * 64 + i + 1] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = p_1 + 4i0
[j * 64 + i] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = p_0 + 4i0
These parameters only differ from start value. To enable parameter sharing,
we split the start value from SCEVAddRecExpr, so they would share a single
parameter that always has zero start value:
p0: {0,+,256}<%for.cond1.preheader>
[j * 64 + i + 1] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = 4 + p_1 + 4i0
[j * 64 + i] => MemRef_input[o0] : 4o0 = p_0 + 4i0
Such translation can make the polly-dependence much faster.
Contributed-by: Star Tan <tanmx_star@yeah.net>
llvm-svn: 187728
Previously this happend to work for integers up to i64, but we got it wrong
for larger numbers. Fix this and add test cases to verify this keeps working.
Reported by: Sven Verdoolaege <skimo at kotnet dot org>
llvm-svn: 183986
We do not only need to understand that 'k * p' is a parameter expression, but
also need to store this expression in the set of parameters. Before this patch
we wrongly stored the two individual parameters %k and %p.
Reported by: Sebastian Pop <spop@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 179485
In my previous commits I failed to realise that my new requires lines fully
disabled these tests. We now properly check if we are in an asserts build and
only disable the tests if assertions are not available.
Reported-by: Sean Silva <silvas@purdue.edu>
llvm-svn: 176900
This fixes issues caused by the following commit:
r176733 | jvoung | 2013-03-08 17:56:31 -0500
Disable statistics on Release builds and move tests that depend on -stats.
Reported by: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
llvm-svn: 176856
At the moment we can handle such arrays only by conservatively assuming that
each access to such an array may touch any element in the array. It would be
great if we could improve Polly/LLVM at some point, such that we can
recover the multi-dimensionality of the accesses.
llvm-svn: 163619
This ensures that the isl sets/maps we operate on have the same parameter
dimensions. Operations on objects with different parameter dimensions are not
allow and trigger assertions.
llvm-svn: 163618
Derive the maximal and minimal values of a parameter from the type it has. Add
this information to the scop context. This information is needed, to derive
optimal types during code generation.
llvm-svn: 157245
This also fixes UMax where we did not correctly keep track of the parameters.
Fixes PR12275.
Reported-By: Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 152913
The FinalRead statement represented a virtual read that is executed after the
SCoP. It was used when we verified the correctness of a schedule by checking if
it yields the same FLOW dependences as the original code. This is only works, if
we have a final read that reads all memory at the end of the SCoP.
We now switched to just checking if a schedule does not introduce negative
dependences and also consider WAW WAR dependences. This restricts the schedules
a little bit more, but we do not have any optimizer that would calculate a more
complex schedule. Hence, for now final reads are obsolete.
llvm-svn: 152319
In case we can not analyze an access function, we do not discard the SCoP, but
assume conservatively that all memory accesses that can be derived from our base
pointer may be accessed.
Patch provided by: Marcello Maggioni <hayarms@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 146972
Parameters can be complex SCEV expressions, but they can also be single scalar
values. If a parameters is such a simple scalar value and the value is named,
use this name to name the isl parameter dimensions.
llvm-svn: 144641
Instead of using TempScop to find parameters, we detect them directly
on the SCEV. This allows us to remove the TempScop parameter detection
in a subsequent commit.
This fixes a bug reported by Marcello Maggioni <hayarms@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 144087
Tobias Grosser