This reduces the "ambiguous reference" errors (which are rather strange in C/ObjC) and fixes an assertion hit
with an invalid code test case.
llvm-svn: 175869
the "nonatomic" attribute in property redeclaration
in class extension. Also, improved on diagnostics in
this area while at it. // rdar://13156292
llvm-svn: 174821
"auto-synthesized may not work correctly with 'nib' loader"
when 'readonly' property is redeclared 'readwrite' in class
extension. // rdar://13123861
llvm-svn: 174775
return type of a function by canonicalizing them away. They are
useless anyway, and conflict with our rules for template argument
deduction and __strong. Fixes <rdar://problem/12367446>.
llvm-svn: 172768
overriding and overridden method, allow the overridden method to have
a narrower contract (introduced earlier, deprecated/obsoleted later)
than the overriding method. Fixes <rdar://problem/12992023>.
llvm-svn: 172567
Along the way, fix a bug in CheckLiteralKind(), previously in diagnoseObjCLiteralComparison, where we didn't ignore parentheses
in boxed expressions for purpose of classification.
In other words, both @42 and @(42) should be classified as numeric
literals.
llvm-svn: 170931
has inconsistent ownership with the backing ivar, point the error location to the
ivar.
Pointing to the ivar (instead of the @synthesize) is better since this is where a fix is needed.
Also provide the location of @synthesize via a note.
This also fixes the problem where an auto-synthesized property would emit an error without
any location.
llvm-svn: 170039
For most cases where a conversion specifier doesn't match an argument,
we usually guess that the conversion specifier is wrong. However, if
the argument is an integer type and the specifier is %C, it's likely
the user really did mean to print the integer as a character.
(This is more common than %c because there is no way to specify a unichar
literal -- you have to write an integer literal, such as '0x2603',
and then cast it to unichar.)
This does not change the behavior of %S, since there are fewer cases
where printing a literal Unicode *string* is necessary, but this could
easily be changed in the future.
<rdar://problem/11982013>
llvm-svn: 169400
This warning was failing to fire under ARC because of the implicit
lifetime casts added around the object literal expression.
<rdar://problem/11300873>, again.
llvm-svn: 167648
Previously, the warning would erroneously fire on this:
for (Test *a in someArray)
use(a.weakProp);
...because it looks like the same property is being accessed over and over.
However, clearly this is not the case. We now ignore loops like this for
local variables, but continue to warn if the base object is a parameter,
global variable, or instance variable, on the assumption that these are
not repeatedly usually assigned to within loops.
Additionally, do-while loops where the condition is 'false' are not really
loops at all; usually they're just used for semicolon-swallowing macros or
using "break" like "goto".
<rdar://problem/12578785&12578849>
llvm-svn: 166942
Also, unify ObjCShouldCallSuperDealloc and ObjCShouldCallSuperFinalize.
The two have identical behavior and will never be active at the same time.
There's one last simplification now, which is that if we see a call to
[super foo] and we are currently in a method named 'foo', we will
/unconditionally/ clear the ObjCShouldCallSuper flag, rather than check
first to see if we're in a method where calling super is required. There's
no reason to pay the extra lookup price here.
llvm-svn: 166285
This is a "safe" pattern, or at least one that cannot be helped by using
a strong local variable. However, if the single read is within a loop,
it should /always/ be treated as potentially dangerous.
<rdar://problem/12437490>
llvm-svn: 165719
Previously, [foo weakProp] was not being treated the same as foo.weakProp.
Now, for every explicit message send, we check if it's a property access,
and if so, if the property is weak. Then for every assignment of a
message, we have to do the same thing again.
This is a potentially expensive increase because determining whether a
method is a property accessor requires searching through the methods it
overrides. However, without it -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak will miss cases
from people who prefer not to use dot syntax. If this turns out to be
too expensive, we can try caching the result somewhere, or even lose
precision by not checking superclass methods. The warning is off-by-default,
though.
<rdar://problem/12407765>
llvm-svn: 165718
Then, switch users of PropertyIfSetterOrGetter and LookupPropertyDecl
(the latter by name) over to findPropertyDecl. This actually makes
-Wreceiver-is-weak a bit stronger than it was before.
llvm-svn: 165628
Old algorithm:
1. See if the name looks like a getter or setter.
2. Use the name to look up a property in the current ObjCContainer
and all its protocols.
3. If the current container is an interface, also look in all categories
and superclasses (and superclass categories, and so on).
New algorithm:
1. See if the method is marked as a property accessor. If so, look through
all properties in the current container and find one that has a matching
selector.
2. Find all overrides of the method using ObjCMethodDecl's
getOverriddenMethods. This collects methods in superclasses and protocols
(as well as superclass categories, which isn't really necessary), and
checks if THEY are accessors. This part is not done recursively, since
getOverriddenMethods is already recursive.
This lets us handle getters and setters that do not match the property
names.
llvm-svn: 165627
Argyrios Kyrtzidis