Summary:
Assembly of atomic.notify has been fixed in r364576, so we can enable
it.
Reviewers: aardappel
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63898
llvm-svn: 364596
This is part of the transition to the new Fuchsia exception syscalls
signature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63897
llvm-svn: 364594
This is part of the soft-transition to the new system call name.
These two system calls are the same so this change is no-op.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63895
llvm-svn: 364593
These lit configuration files are really Python source code. Using the
.py file extension helps editors and tools use the correct language
mode. LLVM and Clang already use this convention for lit configuration,
this change simply applies it to all of compiler-rt.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63658
llvm-svn: 364591
This is a follow-up to r364466, but better implemented. Original
commit message still applies:
The breakpoint locations were in places where clang doesn't actually
emit a source location for and depend on the debugger's ability to
move the breakpoint forward onto a line that is already in the
function epilogue. In my testing older versions of LLDB fail to do
that, so I'm modifying the test to force a break-able location by
calling a noinline function.
<rdar://problem/52079841>
llvm-svn: 364589
FeatureFusion bits was first introduced in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL253724. for add/load integer fusion for P8.
The only use of `hasFusion` was https://reviews.llvm.org/rL255319.
However, this was removed later in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL280440.
So, there is NO any reference to fusion in code now.
Leaving it there is misleading and confusing, so remove it for now.
We can alwasy add back if we ever support fusion in the future.
llvm-svn: 364581
The `willreturn` function attribute guarantees that a function call will
come back to the call site if the call is also known not to throw.
Therefore, this attribute can be used in
`isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor`.
Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku)
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63372
llvm-svn: 364580
The previous output was next to useless if *any* exit was not computable. If we have more than one exit, show the exit count for each so that it's easier to see what's going from with SCEV analysis when debugging.
llvm-svn: 364579
The fold (D63391) uses multiplicativeInverse(),
but it is not guaranteed to always succeed,
and '100' appears to be one of the problematic values.
llvm-svn: 364578
Update the doc after llvm-svn: 364121 is landed.
With two more trivial fixes that are not related to
--disassemble-functions but still about llvm-objdump.
Reviewers: jhenderson, grimar, MaskRay, rupprecht, peter.smith
Reviewed by: jhenderson, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63787
llvm-svn: 364573
Summary:
According to the OpenMP standard, flush makes a thread’s temporary view of memory consistent with memory and enforces an order on the memory operations of the variables explicitly specified or implied.
According to the Cuda toolkit documentation (https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/archive/8.0/cuda-c-programming-guide/index.html#memory-fence-functions), __threadfence() functions provides required functionality.
__threadfence_system() also provides required functionality, but it also
includes some extra functionality, like synchronization of page-locked
host memory, synchronization for the host, etc. It is not required per
the standard and we can use more relaxed version of memory fence
operation.
Reviewers: grokos, gtbercea, kkwli0
Subscribers: guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, openmp-commits, caomhin
Tags: #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62397
llvm-svn: 364572
Summary:
- Match the syntax output by InstPrinter.
- Fix it always emitting 0 for align. Had to work around fact that
opcode is not available for GetDefaultP2Align while parsing.
- Updated tests that were erroneously happy with a p2align=0
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40752
Reviewers: aheejin, sbc100
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits, dschuff
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63633
llvm-svn: 364570
We already had the infrastructure for this, but were waiting for the fix for a number of regressions which were handled by the recent shuffle(extract_subvector(),extract_subvector()) -> extract_subvector(shuffle()) shuffle combines
llvm-svn: 364569
Summary:
The new test case led to incorrect code.
Change-Id: Ief48b227e97aa662dd3535c9bafb27d4a184efca
Reviewers: arsenm, david-salinas
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63871
llvm-svn: 364566
Summary:
I'm submitting a new revision since i don't understand how to reclaim/reopen/take over the existing one, D50222.
There is no such action in "Add Action" menu...
Original patch D50222 by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17: when `C` is constant,
the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
Original patch author: @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)!
Notes:
- In principle, it's possible to also handle the `X % C1 == C2` case, as discussed on bugzilla.
This seems to require an extra branch on overflow, so I refrained from implementing this for now.
- An explicit check for when the `REM` can be reduced to just its LHS is included:
the `X % C` == 0 optimization breaks `test1` in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` otherwise.
I hadn't managed to find a better way to not generate worse output in this case.
- The `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` regresses, and is being fixed by a followup patch D63390.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, hermord, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hermord
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63391
llvm-svn: 364563
This reverts r364358 (git commit b37f2f3391)
Moving this file to a separate repository https://github.com/llvm/.github,
so it doesn't pollute the main tree. It also did not appear to be working.
llvm-svn: 364558
This patch introduces a new function attribute, willreturn, to indicate
that a call of this function will either exhibit undefined behavior or
comes back and continues execution at a point in the existing call stack
that includes the current invocation.
This attribute guarantees that the function does not have any endless
loops, endless recursion, or terminating functions like abort or exit.
Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku)
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62801
llvm-svn: 364555
Emit replacements for clobbered parameters location if the parameter
has unmodified value throughout the funciton. This is basic scenario
where we can use the debug entry values.
([12/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58042
llvm-svn: 364553
The "See Also" section for llvm-nm didn't actually contain any links,
and the tools referred to didn't make much sense (referring to non-LLVM
tools, when we have equivalents, or tools that aren't really to do with
symbol dumping). llvm-objdump's didn't refer to llvm-readelf.
Reviewed by: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63875
llvm-svn: 364552
There is existing bitcode that we need to support where the structured nature
of pointer types is used to derive the result type of some operation. For
example a GEP's operation and result will be based on its input Type.
When pointers become opaque, the BitcodeReader will still have access to this
information because it's explicitly told how to construct the more complex
types used, but this information will not be attached to any Value that gets
looked up. This changes BitcodeReader so that in all places which use type
information in this manner, it's derived from a side-table rather than from the
Value in question.
llvm-svn: 364550
Roman Lebedev