Summary:
`OMPClause` is the base class, it is not descendant from **any**
other class, therefore for it to work with e.g.
`VariadicDynCastAllOfMatcher<>`, it needs to be handled here.
Reviewers: sbenza, bkramer, pcc, klimek, hokein, gribozavr, aaron.ballman, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: gribozavr, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: guansong, jdoerfert, alexfh, ABataev, cfe-commits
Tags: #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112
llvm-svn: 356675
Summary:
This revision adds basic support for formatting C# files with clang-format, I know the barrier to entry is high here so I'm sending this revision in to test the water as to whether this might be something we'd consider landing.
Tracking in Bugzilla as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
Justification:
C# code just looks ugly in comparison to the C++ code in our source tree which is clang-formatted.
I've struggled with Visual Studio reformatting to get a clean and consistent style, I want to format our C# code on saving like I do now for C++ and i want it to have the same style as defined in our .clang-format file, so it consistent as it can be with C++. (Braces/Breaking/Spaces/Indent etc..)
Using clang format without this patch leaves the code in a bad state, sometimes when the BreakStringLiterals is set, it fails to compile.
Mostly the C# is similar to Java, except instead of JavaAnnotations I try to reuse the TT_AttributeSquare.
Almost the most valuable portion is to have a new Language in order to partition the configuration for C# within a common .clang-format file, with the auto detection on the .cs extension. But there are other C# specific styles that could be added later if this is accepted. in particular how `{ set;get }` is formatted.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, krasimir, benhamilton, JonasToth
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58404
llvm-svn: 356662
For a rather short code snippet, if debug.ReportStmts (added in this patch) was
enabled, a bug reporter visitor crashed:
struct h {
operator int();
};
int k() {
return h();
}
Ultimately, this originated from PathDiagnosticLocation::createMemberLoc, as it
didn't handle the case where it's MemberExpr typed parameter returned and
invalid SourceLocation for MemberExpr::getMemberLoc. The solution was to find
any related valid SourceLocaion, and Stmt::getBeginLoc happens to be just that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58777
llvm-svn: 356161
Summary:
Addressing: PR25010 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25010
Code like:
```
if(true) var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
is reformatted to be
```
if (true)
var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
Even when `AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine` is true
The following revision comes from a +1'd suggestion in the PR to support AllowShortIfElseStatementsOnASingleLine
This suppresses the clause prevents the merging of the if when there is a compound else
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, reuk
Reviewed By: reuk
Subscribers: reuk, Higuoxing, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59087
llvm-svn: 356031
Summary:
Addressing: PR25010 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25010
Code like:
```
if(true) var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
is reformatted to be
```
if (true)
var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
Even when `AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine` is true
The following revision comes from a +1'd suggestion in the PR to support AllowShortIfElseStatementsOnASingleLine
This suppresses the clause prevents the merging of the if when there is a compound else
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, reuk
Reviewed By: reuk
Subscribers: reuk, Higuoxing, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59087
llvm-svn: 356029
Add an install target for clang's API headers, which allows them to be
included in distributions. The install rules already existed, but they
lacked a component and a target, making them only accessible via a full
install. These headers are useful for writing clang-based tooling, for
example. They're the clang equivalent to the llvm-headers target and
complement the clang-libraries target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58317
llvm-svn: 355853
Summary:
ShadowCallStack on x86_64 suffered from the same racy security issues as
Return Flow Guard and had performance overhead as high as 13% depending
on the benchmark. x86_64 ShadowCallStack was always an experimental
feature and never shipped a runtime required to support it, as such
there are no expected downstream users.
Reviewers: pcc
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, hiraditya, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59034
llvm-svn: 355624
I assume the example is wrong as it's clearly missing line-breaks before
braces.
I just ran the example through clang-format with .clang-format like
this:
BreakBeforeBraces: Allman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58941
llvm-svn: 355365
Summary:
The current install-clang-headers target installs clang's resource
directory headers. This is different from the install-llvm-headers
target, which installs LLVM's API headers. We want to introduce the
corresponding target to clang, and the natural name for that new target
would be install-clang-headers. Rename the existing target to
install-clang-resource-headers to free up the install-clang-headers name
for the new target, following the discussion on cfe-dev [1].
I didn't find any bots on zorg referencing install-clang-headers. I'll
send out another PSA to cfe-dev to accompany this rename.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-February/061365.html
Reviewers: beanz, phosek, tstellar, rnk, dim, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, jdoerfert, #sanitizers, openmp-commits, lldb-commits, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #lldb, #openmp, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58791
llvm-svn: 355340
Part 1 of CSPGO change in Clang. This includes changes in clang options
and calls to llvm PassManager. Tests will be committed in part2.
This change needs the PassManager change in llvm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54176
llvm-svn: 355331
Summary:
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain ChooseExpr (the GNU
__builtin_choose_expr construction). This is needed, for example, for
cross-CTU analysis of C code that makes use of __builtin_choose_expr.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter.
This was originally reviewed and approved in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58292 and submitted as r354832. It was
reverted in r354839 due to failures on the Windows CI builds.
This version fixes the test failures on Windows, which were caused by
differences in template expansion between versions of clang on different
OSes. The version of clang built with MSVC and running on Windows never
expands the template in the C++ test in ImportExpr.ImportChooseExpr in
clang/unittests/AST/ASTImporter.cpp, but the version on Linux does for
the empty arguments and -fms-compatibility.
So, this version of the patch drops the C++ test for
__builtin_choose_expr, since that version was written to catch
regressions of the logic for isConditionTrue() in the AST import code
for ChooseExpr, and those regressions are also caught by
ASTImporterOptionSpecificTestBase.ImportChooseExpr, which does work on
Windows.
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, martong, aaron.ballman, rnk, a.sidorin
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jdoerfert, rnkovacs, aaron.ballman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58663
llvm-svn: 354916
Summary:
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain ChooseExpr (the GNU
__builtin_choose_expr construction). This is needed, for example, for
cross-CTU analysis of C code that makes use of __builtin_choose_expr.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter.
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, martong, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, rnkovacs, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58292
llvm-svn: 354832
Summary: Provided rule of thumb percentage chances of miss for 4 and 8 bit tag sizes.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58195
llvm-svn: 353990
- Remove most of the discussion of the x86_64 implementation;
link to an older version of the documentation for details of
that implementation.
- Add description of the compatibility and security issues discovered
during the development of the aarch64 implementation for Android.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58105
llvm-svn: 353890
There are certain unsafe or deprecated (since C11) buffer handling
functions which should be avoided in safety critical code. They
could cause buffer overflows. A new checker,
'security.insecureAPI.DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling' warns for
every occurrence of such functions (unsafe or deprecated printf,
scanf family, and other buffer handling functions, which now have
a secure variant).
Patch by Dániel Kolozsvári!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35068
llvm-svn: 353698
Specifically:
* fixes the comments on `hasObjectExpression`,
* clarifies comments on `thisPointerType` and `on`,
* adds comments to `onImplicitObjectArgument`.
It also updates associated reference docs (using the doc tool).
Reviewers: alexfh, steveire, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56849
llvm-svn: 353532
The lack of documentation has been a long standing issue in the Static Analyzer,
and one of the leading reasons behind this was a lack of good documentation
infrastucture.
This lead serious drawbacks, such as
* Not having proper release notes for years
* Not being able to have a sensible auto-generated checker documentations (which
lead to most of them not having any)
* The HTML website that has to updated manually is a chore, and has been
outdated for a long while
* Many design discussions are now hidden in phabricator revisions
This patch implements a new documentation infrastucture using Sphinx, like most
of the other subprojects in LLVM. It transformed some pages as a proof-of-
concept, with many others to follow in later patches. The eventual goal is to
preserve the original website's (https://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/) frontpage,
but move everything else to the new format.
Some other ideas, like creating a unipage for each checker (similar to how
clang-tidy works now), are also being discussed.
Patch by Dániel Krupp!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429
llvm-svn: 353126
This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the
potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a
drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when
a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance,
__builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the
following function:
void f(size_t alloc) {
char* p = malloc(alloc);
strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0))
}
This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the
object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to
-1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to
__builtin___strcpy_chk.
rdar://32212419
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760
llvm-svn: 352665
This fixes most references to the paths:
llvm.org/svn/
llvm.org/git/
llvm.org/viewvc/
github.com/llvm-mirror/
github.com/llvm-project/
reviews.llvm.org/diffusion/
to instead point to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.
This is *not* a trivial substitution, because additionally, all the
checkout instructions had to be migrated to instruct users on how to
use the monorepo layout, setting LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS instead of
checking out various projects into various subdirectories.
I've attempted to not change any scripts here, only documentation. The
scripts will have to be addressed separately.
Additionally, I've deleted one document which appeared to be outdated
and unneeded:
lldb/docs/building-with-debug-llvm.txt
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57330
llvm-svn: 352514
As Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-January/129543.html
There are problems exposing the _Float16 type on architectures that
haven't defined the ABI/ISel for the type yet, so we're temporarily
disabling the type and making it opt-in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57188
Change-Id: I5db7366dedf1deb9485adb8948b1deb7e612a736
llvm-svn: 352221
This is a fix for https://reviews.llvm.org/D51229 where we pass the
address_space qualified type as the modified type of an AttributedType. This
change now instead wraps the AttributedType with either the address_space
qualifier or a DependentAddressSpaceType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55447
llvm-svn: 351997
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351105
Fixes the sphinx warning:
tools/clang/docs/DiagnosticsReference.rst:7889: WARNING: Title underline
too short.
That I just introduced in r350877.
llvm-svn: 350878
Roman Lebedev