Semantics of parameters named Index and Idx were inconsistent between
"include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h", "lib/IR/AttributeImpl.h" and
"lib/IR/Attributes.cpp": sometimes these were fixed 1-based indexes of IR
parameters (or AttributeSet::ReturnIndex for IR return values or
AttributeSet::FunctionIndex for IR functions), other times they were the
internal slot for storage in the underlying AttributeSetImpl. I renamed usage of
the former to "Index" and usage of the latter to "Slot" ("Slot" was already
being used consistently for the latter in a subset of cases)
Patch by Stephen Lin!
llvm-svn: 179791
1. Verify::VerifyParameterAttrs in "lib/IR/Verifier.cpp" and
AttrBuilder::removeFunctionOnlyAttrs in "lib/IR/Attributes.cpp" (only called
by Verify::VerifyFunctionAttrs) separately maintained a list of function-only
attribute types. I've consolidated the logic into a new function used for
both cases in "lib/IR/Verifier.cpp", so this logic is in one place (other
than the AsmParser front-end)
2. Various functions in "lib/IR/Verifier.cpp" passed AttributeSet around by
reference needlessly, as it's just a handle to an immutable pimpl body.
Patch by Stephen Lin!
llvm-svn: 179790
In X86FastISel::X86SelectStore(), improperly aligned stores are rejected and
handled by the DAG-based ISel. However, X86FastISel::X86SelectLoad() makes
no such requirement. There doesn't appear to be an x86 architectural
correctness issue with allowing potentially unaligned store instructions.
This patch removes this restriction.
Patch by Jim Stichnot.
llvm-svn: 179774
A min/max operation is represented by a select(cmp(lt/le/gt/ge, X, Y), X, Y)
sequence in LLVM. If we see such a sequence we can treat it just as any other
commutative binary instruction and reduce it.
This appears to help bzip2 by about 1.5% on an imac12,2.
radar://12960601
llvm-svn: 179773
This was a suggestion by Jordan Rose since the documented format for these pragmas is without the parentheses. At the same time, I've increased test coverage too for the preprocessed output.
llvm-svn: 179771
The analyzer uses LazyCompoundVals to represent rvalues of aggregate types,
most importantly structs and arrays. This allows us to efficiently copy
around an entire struct, rather than doing a memberwise load every time a
struct rvalue is encountered. This can also keep memory usage down by
allowing several structs to "share" the same snapshotted bindings.
However, /lookup/ through LazyCompoundVals can be expensive, especially
since they can end up chaining back to the original value. While we try
to reuse LazyCompoundVals whenever it's safe, and cache information about
this transitivity, the fact is it's sometimes just not a good idea to
perpetuate LazyCompoundVals -- the tradeoffs just aren't worth it.
This commit changes RegionStore so that binding a LazyCompoundVal to struct
will do a memberwise copy if the struct is simple enough. Today's definition
of "simple enough" is "up to N scalar members" (see below), but that could
easily be changed in the future. This is enough to bring the test case in
PR15697 back down to a manageable analysis time (within 20% of its original
time, in an unfair test where the new analyzer is not compiled with LTO).
The actual value of "N" is controlled by a new -analyzer-config option,
'region-store-small-struct-limit'. It defaults to "2", meaning structs with
zero, one, or two scalar members will be considered "simple enough" for
this code path.
It's worth noting that a more straightforward implementation would do this
on load, not on bind, and make use of the structure we already have for this:
CompoundVal. A long time ago, this was actually how RegionStore modeled
aggregate-to-aggregate copies, but today it's only used for compound literals.
Unfortunately, it seems that we've special-cased LazyCompoundVal in certain
places (such as liveness checks) but failed to similarly special-case
CompoundVal in all of them. Until we're confident that CompoundVal is
handled properly everywhere, this solution is safer, since the entire
optimization is just an implementation detail of RegionStore.
<rdar://problem/13599304>
llvm-svn: 179767
A C++ overloaded operator may be implemented as an instance method, and
that instance method may be called on an rvalue object, which has no
associated region. The analyzer handles this by creating a temporary region
just for the evaluation of this call; however, it is possible that /by
creating the region/, the analyzer ends up in a previously-explored state.
In this case we don't need to continue along this path.
This doesn't actually show any behavioral change now, but it starts being
used with the next commit and prevents an assertion failure there.
llvm-svn: 179766
This occurs due to an alloca representing a separate ownership from the
original pointer. Thus consider the following pseudo-IR:
objc_retain(%a)
for (...) {
objc_retain(%a)
%block <- %a
F(%block)
objc_release(%block)
}
objc_release(%a)
From the perspective of the optimizer, the %block is a separate
provenance from the original %a. Thus the optimizer pairs up the inner
retain for %a and the outer release from %a, resulting in segfaults.
This is fixed by noting that the signature of a mismatch of
retain/releases inside the for loop is a Use/CanRelease top down with an
None bottom up (since bottom up the Retain-CanRelease-Use-Release
sequence is completed by the inner objc_retain, but top down due to the
differing provenance from the objc_release said sequence is not
completed). In said case in CheckForCFGHazards, we now clear the state
of %a implying that no pairing will occur.
Additionally a test case is included.
rdar://12969722
llvm-svn: 179747
Dmitri Gribenko