Other standard libraries don't implement availability markup, so it doesn't
make sense to e.g. XFAIL tests based on availability markup outside of
libc++.
llvm-svn: 348871
It's currently not safe to outline landingpad instructions (see
llvm.org/PR39917). Like @llvm.eh.typeid.for, the order and content of
previous landingpad instructions in a function alters the lowering of
subsequent landingpads by renumbering type info ID's. Outlining a
landingpad therefore breaks exception handling & unwinding.
llvm-svn: 348870
This is part of an ongoing cleanup of the LIT test suite, where I'm
trying to reduce the number of configuration options. In this case,
the original intent seemed to be running the test suite with libstdc++,
but this is now supported by specifying cxx_stdlib_under_test=libstdc++.
llvm-svn: 348868
It is unreachable because we test that the cxx_stdlib_under_test is
in the supported set of libraries elsewhere. Furthermore, this code
relied on the `use_stdlib_type`, which is never defined.
llvm-svn: 348867
for the DICompileUnit.
This addresses post-commit feedback for D55085. Without this patch, a
main source file with an absolute paths may appear in different
DIFiles, once with the absolute path and once with the common prefix
between the absolute path and the current working directory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55519
llvm-svn: 348865
Summary:
ASan does not support statically linked binaries, but ASan runtime itself can
be statically linked into a target binary executable.
Reviewers: eugenis, kcc
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55066
llvm-svn: 348863
call iM movmsk(sext <N x i1> X) --> zext (bitcast <N x i1> X to iN) to iM
This has the potential to create less-than-8-bit scalar types as shown in
some of the test diffs, but it looks like the backend knows how to deal
with that in these patterns. This is the simple part of the fix suggested in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39927
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55529
llvm-svn: 348862
These involve cases where certain uses are dead by means of having
no demanded bits, even though the used instruction still has demanded
bits when other uses are taken into account. BDCE currently does not
simplify such cases.
llvm-svn: 348861
Increase the range for omp_get_wtick() test to allow for 0.01
(from <0.01). This is needed for NetBSD where it returns exactly that
value due to CLOCKS_PER_SEC being 100. This should not cause
a significant difference from e.g. FreeBSD where it is 128,
and especially from Linux where CLOCKS_PER_SEC is apparently meaningless
and sysconf(_SC_CLK_TCK) gives 100 as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55493
llvm-svn: 348857
On NetBSD, alloca() is in stdlib.h and there is no alloca.h. Adjust
the includes appopriately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55487
llvm-svn: 348856
Pass `-n -s` instead of `--numeric --stable` to sort(1), as long options
are not supported by NetBSD sort implementation. `-n` is defined
by POSIX, so it should be fully portable. `-s` is used consistently
at least in GNU sort and FreeBSD sort, and I honestly doubt it would
cause issues with any other implementation supporting `--stable`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55479
llvm-svn: 348855
Prefer using '-std=gnu++11' over '-std=c++11' when available, as NetBSD
exposes the correct alloca() implementation only with gnu* C/C++
standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55477
llvm-svn: 348854
Summary:
When doing X86CondBrFolding::analyzeCompare, it will meet the SUB32ri instruction as below to use the global address for its operand,
%733:gr32 = SUB32ri %62:gr32(tied-def 0), @img2buf_normal, implicit-def $eflags
JNE_1 %bb.41, implicit $eflags
so the assertion "assert(MI.getOperand(ValueIndex).isImm() && "Expecting Imm operand")" is not correct and change the assert to if make X86CondBrFolding::analyzeCompare return false as not finding the compare for this
Patch by Jianping Chen
Reviewers: smaslov, LuoYuanke, liutianle, Jianping
Reviewed By: Jianping
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54250
llvm-svn: 348853
Rename the 'append_if' macro used in libunwind to 'unwind_append_if'.
Otherwise, when used in a combined LLVM+libunwind build, it overrides
the *incompatible* 'append_if' function from LLVM and breaks projects
following libunwind, e.g. OpenMP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55476
llvm-svn: 348852
As discussed in D55494, we want to extend this to handle 8-bit
ops too, but that could be extended further to enable this on
32-bit systems too.
llvm-svn: 348851
Summary:
This function was named such because in the case of MachO files, the
mach header is located at this address. However all (most?) usages of
this function were not interested in that fact, but the fact that this
address is used as the base address for expressing various relative
addresses in the object file.
For other object file formats, this name is not appropriate (and it's
probably the reason why this function was not implemented in these
classes). In the ELF case the ELF header will usually end up at this
address, but this is a result of the linker optimizing the file layout
and not a requirement of the spec. For COFF files, I believe the is no
header located at this address either.
Reviewers: clayborg, jasonmolenda, amccarth, lemo, stella.stamenova
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55422
llvm-svn: 348849
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
This is a re-application of r348824, which broke the build in C++03 mode
because a test was marked as supported in C++03 when it shouldn't be.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348847
As discussed in:
D55494
...this code has been disabled/dead for a long time (the code references
Athlon and Pentium 4), and there's almost no chance that it will be used
given the last decade of uarch evolution. Also, in SDAG we promote 16-bit
ops to 32-bit, so there's almost no way to test this code any more.
llvm-svn: 348845
Summary:
All targets either just return false here or properly model `Fast`, so I
don't think there is any reason to prevent CodeGen from doing the right
thing here.
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55365
llvm-svn: 348843
Summary: A new check came in over the weekend; it should use our existing infrastructure for matching `absl::Duration` factories.
Patch by hwright.
Reviewers: JonasToth
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: astrelni
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55541
llvm-svn: 348842
Summary:
Fix bug where we'd try symbolize a second time with the same arguments even though symbolization failed the first time.
This looks like a long standing typo given that the guard for trying
symbolization again is to only try it if symbolization failed using
`binary` and `original_binary != binary`.
Reviewers: kubamracek, glider, samsonov
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55504
llvm-svn: 348841
Summary: Several tests re-implement these same prototypes (differently), so we can put them in a common location.
Patch by hwright.
Reviewers: JonasToth
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55540
llvm-svn: 348840
Summary:
When eliminating a dead argument or return value in a function with
local linkage, all uses, including in dbg.value intrinsics, would be
replaced with null constants. This would mean that, for example for an
integer argument, the debug info would incorrectly express that the
value is 0. Instead, replace all uses with undef to indicate that the
argument/return value is optimized out.
Also, make sure that metadata uses of return values are rewritten even
if there are no non-metadata uses of the value.
As a bit of historical curiosity, the code that emitted null constants
was introduced in the initial check-in of the pass in 2003, before
'undef' values even existed in LLVM.
This fixes PR23260.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, vsk, djtodoro
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55513
llvm-svn: 348837
Attribute 'dso_local' generated in bitcode from compiling
original C file but isn't needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55521
llvm-svn: 348835
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348824
Michal Gorny