With cpp11-migrate core functionality moved to a separate library (for enabling
unit tests) this library contained code that referenced symbols that are still
in the main binary. On some platforms, the shared library build broke as a
result. This revision fixes the dependency problem and is safe for the eventual
lib-ification of the transforms as well.
llvm-svn: 178901
With the lib-ification of cpp11-migrate, real unit tests can be written.
Replacing dummy tests with some simple tests for the Transform public
interface.
llvm-svn: 178900
Introducing a negative cache for ObjCLanguageRuntime::LookupInCompleteClassCache()
This helps speed up the (common) case of us looking for classes that are hidden deep within Cocoa internals and repeatedly failing at finding type information for them.
In order for this to work, we need to clean this cache whenever debug information is added. A new symbols loaded event is added that is triggered with add-dsym (before modules loaded would be triggered for both adding modules and adding symbols).
Interested parties can register for this event. Internally, we make sure to clean the negative cache whenever symbols are added.
Lastly, ClassDescriptor::IsTagged() has been refactored to GetTaggedPointerInfo() that also (optionally) returns info and value bits. In this way, data formatters can share tagged pointer code instead of duplicating the required arithmetic.
llvm-svn: 178897
As mentioned in the previous commit message, the use-after-free and
double-free warnings for 'delete' are worth enabling even while the
leak warnings still have false positives.
llvm-svn: 178891
This splits the leak-checking part of alpha.cplusplus.NewDelete into a
separate user-level checker, alpha.cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks. All the
difficult false positives we've seen with the new/delete checker have been
spurious leak warnings; the use-after-free warnings and mismatched
deallocator warnings, while rare, have always been valid.
<rdar://problem/6194569>
llvm-svn: 178890
memory operands.
Essentially, this layers an infix calculator on top of the parsing state
machine. The scale on the index register is still expected to be an immediate
__asm mov eax, [eax + ebx*4]
and will not work with more complex expressions. For example,
__asm mov eax, [eax + ebx*(2*2)]
The plus and minus binary operators assume the numeric value of a register is
zero so as to not change the displacement. Register operands should never
be an operand for a multiply or divide operation; the scale*indexreg
expression is always replaced with a zero on the operand stack to prevent
such a case.
rdar://13521380
llvm-svn: 178881
Summary:
Sets a report hook that emulates pressing "retry" in the "abort, retry,
ignore" dialog box that _CrtDbgReport normally raises. There are many
other ways to disable assertion reports, but this was the only way I
could find that still calls our exception handler.
Reviewers: Bigcheese
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D625
llvm-svn: 178880
InMemoryStruct is extremely dangerous as it returns data from an internal
buffer when the endiannes doesn't match. This should fix the tests on big
endian hosts.
llvm-svn: 178875
Change unittests/ExecutionEngine/Makefile to include Makefile.config before
TARGET_HAS_JIT flag is checked.
Fixes bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
llvm-svn: 178871
The prefixes and names used are now identical to 32-bit ARM, which is also
expected to remain unchanged.
If we made this change after a release, we'd probably have to support both
variants for a while, but I think since AArch64 exists only on trunk now, it's
acceptable to simply swap them now.
llvm-svn: 178870
When the RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef routine finds the target
symbol of a relocation in the local or global symbol table, it performs
a section-relative relocation:
Value.SectionID = lsi->second.first;
Value.Addend = lsi->second.second;
At this point, however, any Addend that might have been specified in
the original relocation record is lost. This is somewhat difficult to
trigger for relocations within the code section since they usually
do not contain non-zero Addends (when built with the default JIT code
model, in any case). However, the problem can be reliably triggered
by a relocation within the data section caused by code like:
int test[2] = { -1, 0 };
int *p = &test[1];
The initializer of "p" will need a relocation to "test + 4". On
platforms using RelA relocations this means an Addend of 4 is required.
Current code ignores this addend when processing the relocation,
resulting in incorrect execution.
Fixed by taking the Addend into account when processing relocations
to symbols found in the local or global symbol table.
Tested on x86_64-linux and powerpc64-linux.
llvm-svn: 178869
Fariborz Jahanian