the bases are completely initialized. This won't work --- base
initializer expressions can rely on the vtables having been set up.
Check for uses of 'this' in the initializers and force a vtable
initialization if found.
This might not be good enough; we might need to extend this to handle
the possibility of arbitrary code finding an external reference to this
(not yet completely-constructed!) object and accessing through it,
in which case we'll probably find ourselves doing a lot more unnecessary
stores.
llvm-svn: 114153
through the bases and fields of the definition of the class in which
the constructor is declared, rather than some other declaration of
that class.
llvm-svn: 99661
InitializationSequence. Specially, switch initialization of a C++
class type (either copy- or direct-initialization).
Also, make sure that we create an elidable copy-construction when
performing copy initialization of a C++ class variable. Fixes PR5826.
llvm-svn: 91750
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
John McCall