Change symbol values in the stack_size section from being 8 bytes, to being a target dependent size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42108
llvm-svn: 322619
Re applying after fixing issues in the diff, sorry for any painful conflicts/merges!
Original RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-August/117028.html
This change adds a '.stack-size' section containing metadata on function stack sizes to output ELF files behind the new -stack-size-section flag. The section contains pairs of function symbol references (8 byte) and stack sizes (unsigned LEB128).
The contents of this section can be used to measure changes to stack sizes between different versions of the compiler or a source base. The advantage of having a section is that we can extract this information when examining binaries that we didn't build, and it allows users and tools easy access to that information just by referencing the binary.
There is a follow up change to add an option to clang.
Thanks.
Reviewers: hfinkel, MatzeB
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: thegameg, asb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39788
llvm-svn: 319430
Summary:
Original RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-August/117028.html
I wasn't sure who to put as reviewers, so please add/remove people as appropriate.
This change adds a '.stack-size' section containing metadata on function stack sizes to output ELF files behind the new -stack-size-section flag. The section contains pairs of function symbol references (8 byte) and stack sizes (unsigned LEB128).
The contents of this section can be used to measure changes to stack sizes between different versions of the compiler or a source base. The advantage of having a section is that we can extract this information when examining binaries that we didn't build, and it allows users and tools easy access to that information just by referencing the binary.
There is a follow up change to add an option to clang.
Thanks.
Reviewers: hfinkel, MatzeB
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: thegameg, asb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39788
llvm-svn: 319423
Added relocation names:
- R_AMDGPU_GOTPCREL32_LO
- R_AMDGPU_GOTPCREL32_HI
- R_AMDGPU_REL32_LO
- R_AMDGPU_REL32_HI
AMDGPU isa only supports 32-bit immediates. In order to access 64-bit address we need to generate 32-bit lo/hi relocations, and do the right math (separate patch). Currently we only generate one 32 bit relocation for lower bits for each access, losing higher bits. Hence we need relocations listed above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25546
llvm-svn: 284191
Lots of blocks had "llvm" or "nasm" syntax types but either weren't following
the syntax, or the syntax has changed (and sphinx hasn't keep up) or the type
doesn't even exist (nasm?).
Other documents had :options: what were invalid. I only removed those that had
warnings, and left the ones that didn't, in order to follow the principle of
least surprise.
This is like this for ages, but the buildbot is now failing on errors. It may
take a while to upgrade the buildbot's sphinx, if that's even possible, but
that shouldn't stop us from getting docs updates (which seem down for quite
a while).
Also, we're not losing any syntax highlight, since when it doesn't parse, it
doesn't colour. Ie. those blocks are not being highlighted anyway.
I'm trying to get all docs in one go, so that it's easy to revert later if we
do fix, or at least easy to know what's to fix.
llvm-svn: 276109
Summary:
We will start generating this in a future patch.
Reviewers: arsenm, kzhuravl, rafael, ruiu, tony-tye
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits, kzhuravl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21482
llvm-svn: 273628
Summary:
This documents the various relocation types that are supported by the
Radeon Open Compute (ROC) runtime (which is essentially the dynamic
linker for AMDGPU).
Only R_AMDGPU_32 is not currently supported by the ROC runtime, but
it will usually be resolved at link time by lld.
Patch by: Konstantin Zhuravlyov
Reviewers: kzhuravl, rafael
Subscribers: rafael, arsenm, llvm-commits, kzhuravl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20952
llvm-svn: 272352
This backend was supposed to generate C++ code which will re-construct
the LLVM IR passed as input. This seems to me to have very marginal
usefulness in the first place.
However, the code has never been updated to use IRBuilder, which makes
its current value negative -- people who look at the output may be
steered to use the *wrong* C++ APIs to construct IR.
Furthermore, it's generated code that doesn't compile since at least
2013.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19942
llvm-svn: 268631
This option takes the name of the basic block you want to visualize
with -view-*-dags
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6948
llvm-svn: 225953
I've been assuming chain operands were always the first operand,
since the documentation says this. I was confused about why they
were missing after instruction selection. Apparently the convention
changes to using the last operand for MachineSDNodes and I've never
noticed before.
llvm-svn: 216934
This reverts commit r200561.
This calling convention was an attempt to match the MSVC C++ ABI for
methods that return structures by value. This solution didn't scale,
because it would have required splitting every CC available on Windows
into two: one for methods and one for free functions.
Now that we can put sret on the second arg (r208453), and Clang does
that (r208458), revert this hack.
llvm-svn: 208459
:doc:`...` and :ref:`...` links help Sphinx keep track the dependencies
between documents and ensure that they are not pointing to nowhere.
Raw HTML links work just fine and are easier for people less familiar
with reST/Sphinx. They are easy to change over to the :doc:/:ref: style
after the fact so this is not a problem.
This commit doesn't fix all of them.
llvm-svn: 205792
MSVC always places the 'this' parameter for a method first. The
implicit 'sret' pointer for methods always comes second. We already
implement this for __thiscall by putting sret parameters on the stack,
but __cdecl methods require putting both parameters on the stack in
opposite order.
Using a special calling convention allows frontends to keep the sret
parameter first, which avoids breaking lots of assumptions in LLVM and
Clang.
Fixes PR15768 with the corresponding change in Clang.
Reviewers: ributzka, majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2663
llvm-svn: 200561
of complex instruction operands (e.g. address modes).
Currently, if a Pat pattern creates an instruction that has a complex
operand (i.e. one that consists of multiple sub-operands at the MI
level), this operand must match a ComplexPattern DAG pattern with the
correct number of output operands.
This commit extends TableGen to alternatively allow match a complex
operands against multiple separate operands at the DAG level.
This allows using Pat patterns to match pre-increment nodes like
pre_store (which must have separate operands at the DAG level) onto
an instruction pattern that uses a multi-operand memory operand,
like the following example on PowerPC (will be committed as a
follow-on patch):
def STWU : DForm_1<37, (outs ptr_rc:$ea_res), (ins GPRC:$rS, memri:$dst),
"stwu $rS, $dst", LdStStoreUpd, []>,
RegConstraint<"$dst.reg = $ea_res">, NoEncode<"$ea_res">;
def : Pat<(pre_store GPRC:$rS, ptr_rc:$ptrreg, iaddroff:$ptroff),
(STWU GPRC:$rS, iaddroff:$ptroff, ptr_rc:$ptrreg)>;
Here, the pair of "ptroff" and "ptrreg" operands is matched onto the
complex operand "dst" of class "memri" in the "STWU" instruction.
Approved by Jakob Stoklund Olesen.
llvm-svn: 177428
Before we learned about :doc:, we used :ref: and put a dummy link at the
top of each page. Don't do that anymore.
This fixes PR14891 as a special case.
llvm-svn: 172162
Hiroshi Inoue