If we have the situation where a Swap feeds a Splat we can sometimes change the
index on the Splat and then remove the Swap instruction.
Fixed the test case that was failing and recommit after pulling the original
commit.
Original revision is here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39009
llvm-svn: 316478
This creates ODR violations if the function is called from another inline function in a header and also creates binary bloat from duplicate definitions.
llvm-svn: 316477
This creates ODR violations if the function is called from another inline function in a header and also creates binary bloat from duplicate definitions.
llvm-svn: 316476
This creates ODR violations if the function is called from another inline function in a header and also creates binary bloat from duplicate definitions.
llvm-svn: 316475
This creates ODR violations if the function is called from another inline function in a header and also creates binary bloat from duplicate definitions.
llvm-svn: 316474
This creates ODR violations if the function is called from another inline function in a header and also creates binary bloat from duplicate definitions.
llvm-svn: 316473
This creates ODR violations if the function is called from another inline
function in a header and also creates binary bloat from duplicate definitions.
llvm-svn: 316472
This creates ODR violations if the function is called from another inline
function in a header and also creates binary bloat from duplicate definitions.
llvm-svn: 316471
This creates ODR violations if the function is called from another
inline function in a header and also creates binary bloat from duplicate
definitions.
llvm-svn: 316470
In BPF backend, we try to optimize away redundant
trunc operations so that kernel verifier rewrite
remains valid. Previous implementation only works
for a single function.
This patch fixed the issue for multiple functions.
It clears internal map data structure before
performing optimization for each function.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
llvm-svn: 316469
This commit adds an initial, skeleton outline of the "extract function"
refactoring. The extracted function doesn't capture variables / rewrite code
yet, it just basically does a simple copy-paste.
The following initiation rules are specified:
- extraction can only be done for executable code in a function/method/block.
This means that you can't extract a global variable initialize into a function
right now.
- simple literals and references are not extractable.
This commit also adds support for full source ranges to clang-refactor's test
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38982
llvm-svn: 316465
Probably due to a change of how some pass initializes its dependencies,
the -write-bitcode pass (Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriterPass.cpp) is not
initialized in opt anymore and therefore not usable with
opt -write-bitcode
Explicitly call initializeWriteBitcodePassPass() to make it available
in opt again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39223
llvm-svn: 316464
When multi-instruction emission is supported, it will no longer be guaranteed
that every BuildMIAction has a corresponding matched instruction. BuildMIAction
should support not having one to cover the case where a rule produces more
instructions than it matched.
llvm-svn: 316463
The type index is from the TPI stream, not the IPI stream. Fix the
dumper, fix type index discovery, and add a test in LLD.
Also improve the log message we emit when we fail to rewrite type
indices in LLD. That's how I found this bug.
llvm-svn: 316461
The problem is due to the runtime's threadprivate cleanup code which tries to
access data that was already destroyed by one of the root threads.
__kmp_init_gtid is used as a checker here since it is set to false before actual
resource cleanup is done in __kmp_cleanup().
Patch by Hansang Bae
llvm-svn: 316452
The commit breaks the case where you specify just a filename to the
compiler. Previously, it would look up the compiler in your path, now it
complains that the compiler is not found. One of the lldb buildbots is
depending on this. It seems like a nice feature to have, as it means
less typing and being able to avoid hard-coding the system compiler path
in the bot config.
This reverts commit r316393.
llvm-svn: 316451
By using the widest type possible for PACKSS truncation we have a better chance of being able to peek through bitcasts and improves other combines driven by ComputeNumSignBits.
llvm-svn: 316448
Ideally, we should compare 32- and 64-bit versions to see if the
ret line is the only difference and then insert the regex only
in that case. But this is a quick hack to avoid a bunch of noise
as existing tests are updated.
llvm-svn: 316443
These tests checked for the line number without a leading ":", so for example,
a missed diagnostic on line 123 could match one on line 1123, 2123, etc,
desynchronising the test for hundreds of lines.
This couldn't cause it to incorrectly pass or fail, but made it hard to track
down test failures.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39238
llvm-svn: 316442
Report a diagnostic when we fail to parse a shift in a memory operand because
the shift type is not an identifier. Without this, we were silently ignoring
the whole instruction.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39237
llvm-svn: 316441
With enabled CINDEXTEST_CODE_COMPLETE_PATTERNS env option (which enables
IncludeCodePatterns in completion options) code completion after colon
currently suggests access modifiers with 2 completion chunks which is
incorrect.
Example:
class A : <Cursor>B
{
}
Currently we get 'NotImplemented:{TypedText public}{Colon :} (40)'
but the correct line is just 'NotImplemented:{TypedText public} (40)'
The fix introduces more specific scope that occurs between ':' and '{'
It allows us to determine when we don't need to add ':' as a second
chunk to the public/protected/private access modifiers.
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38618
llvm-svn: 316436
Summary: This returns error instead of exiting the program in case of error.
Reviewers: klimek, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39042
llvm-svn: 316433
Add check and skip when the store used to determine the target accesses
multiple array elements. Only a single array location should for
mapping the scalar. Having multiple creates problems when deciding which
element to load from. While MemoryAccess::getAddressFunction() should
select just one of them, other problems arise in code that assumes
that there is just one target element per statement instance.
This fixes llvm.org/PR34989
This also reverts r313902 which fixed llvm.org/PR34485 also caused by
a non-functional target array element. This patch avoids the situation
to occur in the first place.
llvm-svn: 316432
Summary:
r264440 added or/and patterns for storing -1 or 0 with the intention of decreasing code size. However,
X86CallFrameOptimization does not recognize these memory accesses so it will not replace them with push's when profitable.
This patch fixes this problem by teaching X86CallFrameOptimization these store 0/-1 idioms.
An alternative fix would be to prevent the 'store 0/1 idioms' patterns from firing when accessing the stack. This would save
the need to teach the pass about these idioms. However, because X86CallFrameOptimization does not always fire we may result
in cases where neither X86CallFrameOptimization not the patterns for 'store 0/1 idioms' fire.
Fixes pr34863
Reviewers: DavidKreitzer, guyblank, aymanmus
Reviewed By: aymanmus
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38738
llvm-svn: 316431
Summary:
Got asserts in llvm::CastInst::getCastOpcode saying:
`DestBits == SrcBits && "Illegal cast to vector (wrong type or size)"' failed.
Problem seemed to be that llvm::ConstantFoldCastInstruction did
not handle ptrtoint cast of a getelementptr returning a vector
correctly. I assume such situations are quite rare, since the
GEP needs to be considered as a constant value (base pointer
being null).
The solution used here is to simply avoid the constant fold
of ptrtoint when the value is a vector. It is not supported,
and by bailing out we do not fail on assertions later on.
Reviewers: craig.topper, majnemer, davide, filcab, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, filcab, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38546
llvm-svn: 316430
Summary:
When describing trunc/zext/sext/ptrtoint/inttoptr in the chapter
about Constant Expressions we now simply refer to the Instruction
Reference. As far as I know there are no difference when it comes
to the semantics and the argument constraints. The only difference
is that the syntax is slighly different for the constant expressions,
regarding the use of parenthesis in constant expressions.
Referring to the Instruction Reference is the same solution as
already used for several other operations, such as bitcast.
The main goal was to add information that vector types are allowed
also in trunc/zext/sext/ptrtoint/inttoptr constant expressions.
That was not explicitly mentioned earlier, and resulted in some
questions in the review of https://reviews.llvm.org/D38546
Reviewers: efriedma, majnemer
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39165
llvm-svn: 316429
This change fixes values of test so that it passes
-verify without errors and also adds comments.
Test was introduced in D39119 and intention was to check
that tool is able to dump few
DW_*GNU_call_site* tags and attributes, so that
change is NFC cleanup.
llvm-svn: 316428
Stefan Pintilie