Summary: If AFL_DRIVER_EXTRA_STATS_FILENAME is set and valid, write to it peak_rss_mb and slowest_unit_time_sec. These are both stats that libFuzzer can print but afl cannot.
Reviewers: kcc, aizatsky, metzman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21742
llvm-svn: 274273
This ensures that the error status set with -polly-on-isl-error-abort is
maintained even after running DependenceInfo and ScheduleOptimizer. Both
passes temporarily set the error status to CONTINUE as the dependence
analysis uses a compute-out and the scheduler may not be able to derive
a schedule. In both cases we want to not abort, but to handle the error
gracefully. Before this commit, we always set the error reporting to ABORT
after these passes. After this commit, we use the error reporting mode that was
active earlier.
This comes without a test case as this would require us to introduce (memory)
errors which would trigger the isl errors.
llvm-svn: 274272
When compiling with modules, header A and B can be in the same module M.
B depends on intrinsics_gen and A doesn't. Compiling a source file #include-ing
header A, we implicitly request module M to be built. It puts header A and B in
the same TU and tries to build them. Since B depends on intrinsics_gen (which
might not be built yet) we run into build failures.
This should fix our modules buildbot.
Patch reviewed by Chris Bieneman.
llvm-svn: 274270
It was failing because it had an explicit check for whether we're on
Windows.
There are a few other similar explicit checks in this file which I
didn't remove because they serve as reasonable documentation that the
test doesn't work with a Windows triple.
llvm-svn: 274269
associated reporting guide.
I want to emphasize that at this point these are just drafts!
This is the result of very extended discussion on the mailing lists on
several different threads:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091218.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/099120.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151019/307070.html
The reporting guide in particular I anticipate will be shaped somewhat
by the advisory committee when they are selected. But hopefully this
serves as a good starting point and good guidance while the advisory
committee is being sorted out.
I'd like to thank all the folks who contributed to this. Many, *many*
people worked to help with drafting, wording, suggestions, and edits.
Also, this is based on widely used existing codes of coduct as mentioned
in the text, and the original authors of those deserve many thanks as
well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741
llvm-svn: 274268
function-style cast to a non-dependent type which is then used in an invalid
way. We'd lose the "type dependent" bit here, and downstream Sema processing
would then discard the expression if it was used in a context where its type
rendered it invalid.
llvm-svn: 274267
Summary:
The thread specific key wasn't not released.
Running the unittest in loop will fail after 1024 iteraions.
```
./projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/Sanitizer-i386-Test --gtest_filter=SanitizerCommon.PthreadDestructorIterations --gtest_repeat=2000 --gtest_break_on_failure
```
```
Repeating all tests (iteration 1023) . . .
Note: Google Test filter = SanitizerCommon.PthreadDestructorIterations
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from SanitizerCommon
[ RUN ] SanitizerCommon.PthreadDestructorIterations
/usr/local/google/home/etienneb/llvm/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/sanitizer_posix_test.cc:54: Failure
Value of: pthread_key_create(&key, &destructor)
Actual: 11
Expected: 0
Aborted (core dumped)
```
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: kubabrecka, llvm-commits, chrisha
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21902
llvm-svn: 274264
Except the seed uniform instructions (conditional branch and consecutive ptr
instructions), dependencies to be added into uniform set should only be used
by existing uniform instructions or intructions outside of current loop.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21755
llvm-svn: 274262
Summary:
This lets LLVM perform IPO over these functions. In particular, it
allows LLVM to emit ld.global.nc for loads to __restrict pointers in
kernels that are never written to.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, tra
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21337
llvm-svn: 274261
Summary:
This test was stat()'ing large swaths of /usr/lib hundreds of times, as
every invocation of matchesConditionally*() created a new Linux
toolchain.
In addition to being slow, perf indicated this was causing substantial
contention in the kernel.
Something is...interesting in the kernel, as without this patch I
sometimes see ~11m spent in the kernel, and sometimes ~5m. This
corresponds to bimodal ninja check-clang times of ~30s and ~20s.
It's not clear to me exactly what causes the bimodality. In any case,
this change makes this test run in 2.5s, down from 17s, and it seems to
cause us to get the 20s ninja check-clang time unconditionally.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21810
llvm-svn: 274257
When concatenating two error lists the ErrorList::join method (which is called
by joinErrors) was failing to set the checked bit on the second error, leading
to a 'failure to check error' assertion.
llvm-svn: 274249
Somehow all the functionality to write PDB files got removed,
probably accidentally when uploading the patch perhaps the wrong
one got uploaded. This re-adds all the code, as well as the
corresponding test.
llvm-svn: 274248
When -gmlt is on, we don't emit namespace or class scope information,
and the CodeView emission code in LLVM can't compute the fully qualified
name. If we know LLVM won't be able to get the name right, go ahead and
emit the qualified name in the frontend.
We could change our -gmlt emission strategy to include those scopes when
emitting codeview, but that would increase memory usage and slow down
LTO and add more complexity to debug info emission.
The same problem exists when you debug a -gmlt binary with GDB, so we
should consider removing '&& EmitCodeView' from the condition here at
some point in the future after evaluating the impact on object file
size.
llvm-svn: 274246
This reverts commit 3db82f646a0890eb7664d0351b5a3c79622e8bef.
Vassil already fixed this and I mechanically undid his fix without looking
too close at what I'm actually doing. Need more coffee.
llvm-svn: 274242
This fixes a typo introduced in r274196.
Thanks to Vassil Vassilev for noticing!
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21827
rdar://problem/27019000
llvm-svn: 274240
Summary:
MSVC provide exception handlers with enhanced information to deal with security buffer feature (/GS).
To be more secure, the security cookies (GS and SEH) are validated when unwinding the stack.
The following code:
```
void f() {}
void foo() {
__try {
f();
} __except(1) {
f();
}
}
```
Reviewers: majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: thakis, llvm-commits, chrisha
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21101
llvm-svn: 274239
Summary:
Found cases where DSE incorrectly add partially-overwritten intervals.
Please see the test case for details.
Reviewers: mcrosier, eeckstein, hfinkel
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21859
llvm-svn: 274237
Summary:
The FlagParser is populating a static global class with the
unrecognized flags when parsing. That global class has a
dcheck that limit the number of unrecognized flag to 20.
```
class UnknownFlags {
static const int kMaxUnknownFlags = 20;
const char *unknown_flags_[kMaxUnknownFlags];
int n_unknown_flags_;
[...]
void Report() {
if (!n_unknown_flags_) return;
Printf("WARNING: found %d unrecognized flag(s):\n", n_unknown_flags_);
for (int i = 0; i < n_unknown_flags_; ++i)
Printf(" %s\n", unknown_flags_[i]);
n_unknown_flags_ = 0;
}
};
UnknownFlags unknown_flags;
```
Unittests based on that class must reset the counter 'n_unknown_flags_' or
the next usage of that class may fail arbitrary. This can be done by
reporting the pending unknown flags.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, wang0109, kubabrecka, chrisha
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21896
llvm-svn: 274234
Summary:
The unittest 'ThreadRegistryThreadedTest' is failing when running in loop.
There are global variables that need to be cleared.
To repro:
```
projects\compiler-rt\lib\sanitizer_common\tests\Release\Sanitizer-x86_64-Test.exe --gtest_filter=SanitizerCommon.ThreadRegistryThreadedTest --gtest_repeat=2
```
Output:
```
Repeating all tests (iteration 1) . . .
Note: Google Test filter = SanitizerCommon.ThreadRegistryThreadedTest
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from SanitizerCommon
[ RUN ] SanitizerCommon.ThreadRegistryThreadedTest
[ OK ] SanitizerCommon.ThreadRegistryThreadedTest (1 ms)
[----------] 1 test from SanitizerCommon (1 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (2 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 1 test.
Repeating all tests (iteration 2) . . .
Note: Google Test filter = SanitizerCommon.ThreadRegistryThreadedTest
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from SanitizerCommon
[ RUN ] SanitizerCommon.ThreadRegistryThreadedTest
C:/src/llvm/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/sanitizer_thread_registry_test.cc(216): error: Value of: num_created[0]
Actual: 2
Expected: 1
C:/src/llvm/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/sanitizer_thread_registry_test.cc(217): error: Value of: num_started[0]
Actual: 2
Expected: 1
C:/src/llvm/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/sanitizer_thread_registry_test.cc(220): error: Value of: num_created[i]
[...]
[ FAILED ] SanitizerCommon.ThreadRegistryThreadedTest (294 ms)
[----------] 1 test from SanitizerCommon (294 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (299 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 0 tests.
[ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below:
[ FAILED ] SanitizerCommon.ThreadRegistryThreadedTest
1 FAILED TEST
```
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, wang0109, kubabrecka, chrisha
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21886
llvm-svn: 274231
Mike Aizatsky