This intrinsic is translated to ALLOC_EXPORT_WORD1_SWIZ, hence its
name. It is used to store vs/fs outputs
Patch by: Vincent Lejeune
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 173297
GCC implements -Wvla as "warn on every VLA" (this is useful to find every VLA,
for example, if they are forbidden by coding guidelines). Currently Clang
implements -Wvla as "warn on VLA when it is an extension".
The attached patch makes our behavior match GCC. The existing vla extwarn is
moved under -Wvla-extension and is still included into -Wgnu.
This fixes PR5953.
llvm-svn: 173286
identifiers into two parts: the part that involves dealing with the
key (which can be re-used) and the ASTReader-specific part that
creates the IdentifierInfos. While I'm at it, StringRef'ify this code,
which was using pair<const char*, unsigned>. No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 173283
that redefined a macro without undef'ing it first.
Proper reconstruction of the macro info history from modules will properly fix this in subsequent commits.
rdar://13016031
llvm-svn: 173281
Before:
int aaaa = aaaaa().aaaaa() // force break
.aaaaa();
After:
int aaaa = aaaaa().aaaaa() // force break
.aaaaa();
The other indent is just wrong and confusing.
llvm-svn: 173273
Before:
bool aaaa = aaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
bool aaaa = aaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
The other indentation was a nice attempt but doesn't work in many cases.
Not sure what the right long term solution is as the "After: " is still
not nice. We either need to figure out what to do in the cases where it
"doesn't work" or come up with a third solution, e.g. falling back to:
bool aaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
which should always work and nicely highlight the structure.
llvm-svn: 173268
This is still an egregious hack since we don't have a nice interface for this
kind of thing but should help the valgrind leak check buildbot to become green.
llvm-svn: 173267
Layouting would prevent breaking before + in
a[b + c] = d;
Regression detected by code review.
Also fixes an invalid-read found by the valgrind bot.
llvm-svn: 173262
Having seen more cases, this actually was not a good thing to do in the
first place. We can still improve on what we do now, but breaking after
the "=" is good in many cases.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa = aa->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaa));
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aa->aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaa));
llvm-svn: 173257
Before: if (int * a = &b) ...
After: if (int *a = &b) ...
Also changed all the existing tests to test the expressions in question
both in a declaration and in an expression context.
llvm-svn: 173256
We will need a more principled solution, but we should not leave this
unfixed until we come up with one.
Before: void f() { int * a; }
After: void f() { int *a; }
llvm-svn: 173252
Eli Bendersky