Focus is on default constructors for the time being. Currently the
exception specification and prototype are processed correctly. Codegen
might work but in all likelihood doesn't.
Note that due to an error, out-of-line defaulting of member functions is
currently impossible. It will continue to that until I muster up the
courage to admit that I secretly pray to epimetheus and that I need to
rework the way default gets from Parse -> Sema.
llvm-svn: 131115
treated as being permanently resident in target
memory. In fact, since the expression's stack frame
is deleted and potentially re-used after the
expression completes, the variables need to be treated
as being freeze-dried.
llvm-svn: 131104
hasTrivialDefaultConstructor() really really means it now.
Also implement a fun standards bug regarding aggregates. Doug, if you'd
like, I can un-implement that bug if you think it is truly a defect.
The bug is that non-special-member constructors are never considered
user-provided, so the following is an aggregate:
struct foo {
foo(int);
};
It's kind of bad, but the solution isn't obvious - should
struct foo {
foo (int) = delete;
};
be an aggregate or not?
Lastly, add a missing initialization to FunctionDecl.
llvm-svn: 131101
also consider whether any of the parameter types (as written, prior to
decay) are dependent. Fixes PR9880 and <rdar://problem/9408413>.
llvm-svn: 131099
into some cleanup I have been wanting to do when reading/writing registers.
Previously all RegisterContext subclasses would need to implement:
virtual bool
ReadRegisterBytes (uint32_t reg, DataExtractor &data);
virtual bool
WriteRegisterBytes (uint32_t reg, DataExtractor &data, uint32_t data_offset = 0);
There is now a new class specifically designed to hold register values:
lldb_private::RegisterValue
The new register context calls that subclasses must implement are:
virtual bool
ReadRegister (const RegisterInfo *reg_info, RegisterValue ®_value) = 0;
virtual bool
WriteRegister (const RegisterInfo *reg_info, const RegisterValue ®_value) = 0;
The RegisterValue class must be big enough to handle any register value. The
class contains an enumeration for the value type, and then a union for the
data value. Any integer/float values are stored directly in an appropriate
host integer/float. Anything bigger is stored in a byte buffer that has a length
and byte order. The RegisterValue class also knows how to copy register value
bytes into in a buffer with a specified byte order which can be used to write
the register value down into memory, and this does the right thing when not
all bytes from the register values are needed (getting a uint8 from a uint32
register value..).
All RegiterContext and other sources have been switched over to using the new
regiter value class.
llvm-svn: 131096
It can happen that a live debug variable is the last use of a sub-register, and
the register allocator will pick a larger register class for the virtual
register. If the allocated register doesn't support the sub-register index,
just use %noreg for the debug variables instead of asserting.
In PR9872, a debug variable ends up in the sub_8bit_hi part of a GR32_ABCD
register. The register is split and one part is inflated to GR32 and assigned
%ESI because there are no more normal uses of sub_8bit_hi.
Since %ESI doesn't have that sub-register, substPhysReg asserted. Now it will
simply insert a %noreg instead, and the debug variable will be marked
unavailable in that range.
We don't currently have a way of saying: !"value" is in bits 8-15 of %ESI, I
don't know if DWARF even supports that.
llvm-svn: 131073
Eli Friedman