In according to the comment, undefined symbol should never reach there.
So, should be able to remove the check. I am assuming this is NFC.
llvm-svn: 338723
This is broken per PR36561 and PR36574, so disable it for now until
somebody interested can take a look. OMPT can still be activated manually
by passing -DLIBOMP_OMPT_SUPPORT=ON during configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50086
llvm-svn: 338721
Only supported since GCC 6 and Intel 17.0. However GCC 6.3.0 is
crashing on two of the tests, so disable them as well...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50085
llvm-svn: 338720
This adds the NAN checks suggested in PR37776:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37776
If both operands to maxnum are NAN, that should get constant folded, so we don't
have to handle that case. This is the same assumption as other FP ops in this
function. Returning 'false' is always conservatively correct.
Copying from the bug report:
Currently, we have this for "when is cannotBeOrderedLessThanZero
(mustBePositiveOrNaN) true for maxnum":
L
-------------------
| Pos | Neg | NaN |
------------------------
|Pos | x | x | x |
------------------------
R |Neg | x | | x |
------------------------
|NaN | x | x | x |
------------------------
The cases with (Neg & NaN) are wrong. We should have:
L
-------------------
| Pos | Neg | NaN |
------------------------
|Pos | x | x | x |
------------------------
R |Neg | x | | |
------------------------
|NaN | x | | x |
------------------------
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50081
llvm-svn: 338716
It does not seem that this code is alive.
I seems was needed previously but we fixed it.
If it is still needed, it needs new tests,
but for now I do not know how to trigger it,
and so I removed it.
llvm-svn: 338713
The way address space declarations for builtins currently work
is nearly useless. The code assumes the address spaces used for
builtins is a confusingly named "target address space" from user
code using __attribute__((address_space(N))) that matches
the builtin declaration. There's no way to use this to declare
a builtin that returns a language specific address space.
The terminology used is highly cofusing since it has nothing
to do with the the address space selected by the target to use
for a language address space.
This feature is essentially unused as-is. AMDGPU and NVPTX
are the only in-tree targets attempting to use this. The AMDGPU
builtins certainly do not behave as intended (i.e. all of the
builtins returning pointers can never compile because the numbered
address space never matches the expected named address space).
The NVPTX builtins are missing tests for some, and the others
seem to rely on an implicit addrspacecast.
Change the used address space for builtins based on a target
hook to allow using a language address space for a builtin.
This allows the same builtin declaration to be used for multiple
languages with similarly purposed address spaces (e.g. the same
AMDGPU builtin can be used in OpenCL and CUDA even though the
constant address spaces are arbitarily different).
This breaks the possibility of using arbitrary numbered
address spaces alongside the named address spaces for builtins.
If this is an issue we probably need to introduce another builtin
declaration character to distinguish language address spaces from
so-called "target address spaces".
llvm-svn: 338707
Summary:
Previously, clang-format would crash if it tried to wrap an overlong
single line comment, because two parts of the code inserted a break in
the same location.
/** heregoesalongcommentwithnospace */
This wasn't previously noticed as it could only trigger for an overlong
single line comment that did have no breaking opportunities except for a
whitespace at the very beginning.
This also introduces a check for JavaScript to not ever wrap a comment
before an opening curly brace:
/** @mods {donotbreakbeforethecurly} */
This is because some machinery parsing these tags sometimes supports
breaks before a possible `{`, but in some other cases does not.
Previously clang-format was careful never to wrap a line with certain
tags on it. The better solution is to specifically disable wrapping
before the problematic token: this allows wrapping and aligning comments
but still avoids the problem.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50177
llvm-svn: 338706
Some lit tests that call llvm-ar use the 'r' flag. If the target archive
already exists and is in a corrupt state, this can cause the test to fail. We
have added 'rm -f' calls before the llvm-ar calls to increase the
robustness of the tests.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49184
llvm-svn: 338705
Corrected and simplified the help text.
It was clearly too difficult to maintain before (see e.g. @227296) making it
simpler and more consistent it should help people keep it up to date.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48577
llvm-svn: 338703
We don't need to use a map to store ResourceState objects. The number of
processor resources is known statically from the scheduling model. We can
therefore use a vector, and reserve a slot for each processor resource that we
want to simulate.
Every time the ResourceManager queries the ResourceState vector, the index to
the vector of ResourceState objects can be easily computed from the processor
resource mask.
This drastically reduces the time complexity of method ResourceManager::use() and
method ResourceManager::release(). This patch gives an average speedup of 12%.
llvm-svn: 338702
Patch by Konstantin Schwarz!
If more than a single output section is added to a PT_LOAD header,
only the first section should set the LMAOffset of the segment.
Otherwise, we get a load-address overlap error
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50133
llvm-svn: 338697
Summary: In order to exploit the potential of LLVM's new ItaniumPartialDemangler for indexing in LLDB, we expect conceptual changes in the implementation of the InitNameIndexes function. Here is a unit test that aims at covering all relevant code paths in that function.
Reviewers: labath, jingham, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: friss, teemperor, davide, clayborg, erik.pilkington, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49909
llvm-svn: 338695
Patch by Konstantin Schwarz!
If both the MemRegion and LMARegion are set for an output section in
a linker script, we should only increase the LMARegion if it is
different from the MemRegion. Otherwise, we reserve the memory twice.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50065
llvm-svn: 338684
Patch by Konstantin Schwarz!
The condition to create a new phdr must also check the usage of "AT>"
linker script command, and create a new PT_LOAD header if a new LMARegion is used.
This fixes PR38307
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50052
llvm-svn: 338679
Adds some cleaned up debug messages from back when I was writing this.
Hopefully useful to others (and myself) as to why unroll and jam is not
transforming as expected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50062
llvm-svn: 338676
As a part of adding the tiny codemodel, we need to support ldr's with :got:
relocations on them. This seems to be mostly already done, just needs the
relocation type support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50137
llvm-svn: 338673
This method has three callers, each of which wanted distinct handling:
1) Sinking into a loop is moving an instruction known to execute before a loop into the loop. We don't need to worry about introducing a fault at all in this case.
2) Hoisting from a loop into a preheader already duplicated the check in the caller.
3) Sinking from the loop into an exit block was the only true user of the code within the routine. For the moment, this has just been lifted into the caller, but up next is examining the logic more carefully. Whitelisting of loads and calls - while consistent with the previous code - is rather suspicious. Either way, a behavior change is worthy of it's own patch.
llvm-svn: 338671
In expansion of FCOPYSIGN, the shift node is missing when the two
operands of FCOPYSIGN are of the same size. We should always generate
shift node (if the required shift bit is not zero) to put the sign
bit into the right position, regardless of the size of underlying
types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49973
llvm-svn: 338665
Evandro Menezes