This change includes the most basic possible GCStrategy for a GC which is using the statepoint lowering code. At the moment, this GCStrategy doesn't really do much - aside from actually generate correct stackmaps that is - but I went ahead and added a few extra correctness checks as proof of concept. It's mostly here to provide documentation on how to do one, and to provide a point for various optimization legality hooks I'd like to add going forward. (For context, see the TODOs in InstCombine around gc.relocate.)
Most of the validation logic added here as proof of concept will soon move in to the Verifier. That move is dependent on http://reviews.llvm.org/D6811
There was discussion in the review thread about addrspace(1) being reserved for something. I'm going to follow up on a seperate llvmdev thread. If needed, I'll update all the code at once.
Note that I am deliberately not making a GCStrategy required to use gc.statepoints with this change. I want to give folks out of tree - including myself - a chance to migrate. In a week or two, I'll make having a GCStrategy be required for gc.statepoints. To this end, I added the gc tag to one of the test cases but not others.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6808
llvm-svn: 225365
Many places reference MVT::LAST_VALUETYPE when iterating over all
valid MVTs, but they usually start with 0.
With FIRST_VALUETYPE, we can avoid explicit constants when we really
should be using MVT::SimpleValueType.
llvm-svn: 225362
LLVM emits stack probes on Windows targets to ensure that the stack is
correctly accessed. However, the amount of stack allocated before
emitting such a probe is hardcoded to 4096.
It is desirable to have this be configurable so that a function might
opt-out of stack probes. Our level of granularity is at the function
level instead of, say, the module level to permit proper generation of
code after LTO.
Patch by Andrew H!
N.B. The inliner needs to be updated to properly consider what happens
after inlining a function with a specific stack-probe-size into another
function with a different stack-probe-size.
llvm-svn: 225360
* Both files have valid package headers and footers (you can verify
with M-x checkdoc).
* Fixed style warnings generated by checkdoc.
* Fixed a byte-compiler warning in llvm-mode.el.
* Ensure that the modes are autoloaded, so users do not need to
(require 'llvm-mode) to use them.
Patch by Wilfred Hughes.
llvm-svn: 225356
Used to iterate over previously added memory dependencies in
adjustChainDeps() and iterateChainSucc().
SDep::isCtrl() was previously used in these places, that also gave
anti and output edges. The code may be worse if these are followed,
because MisNeedChainEdge() will conservatively return true since a
non-memory instruction has no memory operands, and a false chain dep
will be added. It is also unnecessary since all memory accesses of
interest will be reached by memory dependencies, and there is a budget
limit for the number of edges traversed.
This problem was found on an out-of-tree target with enabled alias
analysis. No test case for an in-tree target has been found.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 225351
The change in r225266 was reviewed under D6722. But the commit r225266 has a
typo, causing some MCHammer failures. This patch fixes it.
Change-Id: I573efcff25003af7478ac02548ebbe929fc7f5fd
llvm-svn: 225347
requiring and invalidating specific analyses. Also make their printed
names match their class names. Writing these out as prose really doesn't
make sense to me any more.
llvm-svn: 225346
Even thouh gcc produces simialr instructions as Owen pointed out the two patterns aren’t equivalent in the case
where the original subtraction could have caused an overflow.
Reverting the same.
llvm-svn: 225341
r221973 changed SmallVector::operator[] to use size_t instead of unsigned.
Before that, on 64bit platforms, when a large index (say -1) was passed,
truncating it to unsigned avoided an overflow when computing 'begin() + idx',
and failed the range checking assertion, as expected.
With r221973, idx isn't truncated, so the addition wraps to
'(char*)begin() - 1', and doesn't fire anymore when it should have done so.
This commit changes the comparison to instead compute 'end() - begin()'
(i.e., 'size()'), which avoids potentially overflowing additions, and
correctly triggers the assertion when values such as -1 are passed.
Note that the problem already existed before that revision, on platforms
where sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(unsigned).
llvm-svn: 225338
We can't drop support for RAUW entirely in `MDNode`s, since it's
required for graph construction. This comment was from before I'd done
the math on that (out-of-tree), and never should have been committed.
llvm-svn: 225334
passes too many time.
I think this is actually the issue that someone raised with me at the
developer's meeting and in an email, but that we never really got to the
bottom of. Having all the testing utilities made it much easier to dig
down and uncover the core issue.
When a pass manager is running many passes over a single function, we
need it to invalidate the analyses between each run so that they can be
re-computed as needed. We also need to track the intersection of
preserved higher-level analyses across all the passes that we run (for
example, if there is one module analysis which all the function analyses
preserve, we want to track that and propagate it). Unfortunately, this
interacted poorly with any enclosing pass adaptor between two IR units.
It would see the intersection of preserved analyses, and need to
invalidate any other analyses, but some of the un-preserved analyses
might have already been invalidated *and recomputed*! We would fail to
propagate the fact that the analysis had already been invalidated.
The solution to this struck me as really strange at first, but the more
I thought about it, the more natural it seemed. After a nice discussion
with Duncan about it on IRC, it seemed even nicer. The idea is that
invalidating an analysis *causes* it to be preserved! Preserving the
lack of result is trivial. If it is recomputed, great. Until something
*else* invalidates it again, we're good.
The consequence of this is that the invalidate methods on the analysis
manager which operate over many passes now consume their
PreservedAnalyses object, update it to "preserve" every analysis pass to
which it delivers an invalidation (regardless of whether the pass
chooses to be removed, or handles the invalidation itself by updating
itself). Then we return this augmented set from the invalidate routine,
letting the pass manager take the result and use the intersection of
*that* across each pass run to compute the final preserved set. This
accounts for all the places where the early invalidation of an analysis
has already "preserved" it for a future run.
I've beefed up the testing and adjusted the assertions to show that we
no longer repeatedly invalidate or compute the analyses across nested
pass managers.
llvm-svn: 225333
WillNotOverflowUnsignedAdd's smarts will live in ValueTracking as
computeOverflowForUnsignedAdd. It now returns a tri-state result:
never overflows, always overflows and sometimes overflows.
llvm-svn: 225329
Remove the README.txt entry regarding register allocation of CR logical ops,
and replace it with a FIXME in PPCInstrInfo.td. The text in the README.txt was
not really accurate, and thanks goes to Pat Haugen (and Bill Schmidt) from IBM
for clarifying what was intended and highlighting the relevant text in the ISA
specification.
llvm-svn: 225325
Add the missing `DEPENDS` keyword. r225319 did almost the right thing
(I didn't notice the problem with it because `Kaleidoscope-Ch8` wasn't
building at all).
llvm-svn: 225321
This is affecting the behavior of some ObjC++ / AArch64 test cases on Darwin.
Reverting to get the bots green while I track down the source of the changed
behavior.
llvm-svn: 225311
Olivier Sallenave