to load/store i64 values. Since there's no current support to explicitly
declare such restrictions, implement it by using specific hardcoded register
pairs during isel.
llvm-svn: 132248
Delete the Kill and Def markers in BlockInfo. They are no longer
necessary when BlockInfo describes a continuous live range.
This only affects the relatively rare kind of basic block where a live
range looks like this:
|---x o---|
Now live range splitting can pretend that it is looking at two blocks:
|---x
o---|
This allows the code to be simplified a bit.
llvm-svn: 132245
It is important that this function returns the same number of live blocks as
countLiveBlocks(CurLI) because live range splitting uses the number of live
blocks to ensure it is making progress.
This is in preparation of supporting duplicate UseBlock entries for basic blocks
that have a virtual register live-in and live-out, but not live-though.
llvm-svn: 132244
register allocation dependent and will occasionally break. WIP in the
register allocator to model paired/etc registers.
rdar://9119939
llvm-svn: 132242
There was no way to check if a given register/mode pair was valid. We now return
an error code (-2) instead of asserting. If anyone thinks that an assert
at this point is really needed, we can autogen a hasValidDwarfRegNum instead.
llvm-svn: 132236
was saying that the matching superregister class of GR32_NOREX in GR64_NOREX_NOSP
is GR64_NOREX, which drops the NOSP constraint. This fixes PR10032.
llvm-svn: 132225
subregisters:
When a value is in a subregister, at least report the location as being
the superregister. We should extend the .td files to encode the bit
range so that we can produce a DW_OP_bit_piece.
llvm-svn: 132224
class type (or array thereof), eliminating some redundant checks
(thanks Eli!) and adding some tests where the behavior differs in
C++98/03 vs. C++0x.
llvm-svn: 132218
According to PR2536, the old spiller had trouble with the IMPLICIT_DEF in this
code:
%reg1028<def> = MOV16rm %reg0, 1, %reg0, <ga:g_5>, Mem:LD(2,2) [g_5 + 0]
%reg1039<def> = IMPLICIT_DEF
%reg1038<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1039, %reg1028, 2
%reg1025<def> = AND32ri %reg1038, 65534, %%EFLAGS<imp-def>
However, today we emit a zero-extending load instead:
%vreg10<def> = MOVZX32rm16 %noreg, 1, %noreg, <ga:@g_5>, %noreg; %mem:LD2[@g_5] GR32:%vreg10
%vreg0<def> = AND32ri %vreg10, 65534, %%EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; %GR32:%vreg0,%vreg10
This makes the test pointless since it no longer creates the spiller hazard.
llvm-svn: 132210
to be careful to emit landing pads that are always prepared to handle a
cleanup path. This is correct mostly because of the fix to the LLVM
inliner, r132200.
llvm-svn: 132209
nontemplate in Sema::InstantiateTemplateDecl.
This should make the issue in PR10026 more visible, although it's not
going to fix it because something is violating this precondition.
llvm-svn: 132208
suffix (e.g. .xdata$myfunc). The suffix part isn't implemented yet, but
I'll get to it in the next patch.
Fix up all callers of the affected functions. Make them pass said suffix to
the function.
llvm-svn: 132205
- the selector for the landing pad must provide all available information
about the handlers, filters, and cleanups within that landing pad
- calls to _Unwind_Resume must be converted to branches to the enclosing
lpad so as to avoid re-entering the unwinder when the lpad claimed it
was going to handle the exception in some way
This is quite specific to libUnwind-based unwinding. In an effort to not
interfere too badly with other unwinders, and with existing hacks in frontends,
this only triggers on _Unwind_Resume (not _Unwind_Resume_or_Rethrow) and does
nothing with selectors if it cannot find a selector call for either lpad.
llvm-svn: 132200
Bruno Cardoso Lopes