I suspect I may have misrun the test previously for check-in
r202456 re: pr15258. This test fails consistently on my end.
I changed the test to expected failure on Linux.
llvm-svn: 202517
TestRegisterVariables.test_with_dwarf_and_run_command was being
skipped on Linux due to issues with clang. I converted it to a
@expectedFailureClang and no longer skip on Linux.
llvm-svn: 202515
TestConstVariables.py was disabled on Linux and marked as
unconditional expected failure. This change removes the Linux disable
and makes the expected failure conditional on using clang. The test
runs fine on gcc-built lldb.
llvm-svn: 202514
This test passed 50 out of 50 times for me on Unbuntu 12.04 LTS x86_64
with lldb built using gcc 4.8.2 and July 2013 libedit.
This is related to:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16170
llvm-svn: 202512
Related to this bug:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16714
On TOT lldb svn r202507, I found several of the tests disabled within
TestConcurrentEvents.py to run fine, and several of them to fail 100%
of the time on my system (25 out of 25 times).
This changes the following tests for Linux:
Enables (these all work consistently):
* test_many_watchpoints_dwarf
* test_signal_watch_break_dwarf (line 250)
* test_signal_watch_break_dwarf (line 260 - same named test?)
* test_crash_with_watchpoint_dwarf
* test_crash_with_watchpoint_breakpoint_signal_dwarf
* test_delayed_crash_with_breakpoint_watchpoint_dwarf
Marks as expected failure (these all fail consistently):
* test_many_watchpoints_dwarf
* test_watch_break_dwarf
* test_delay_watch_break_dwarf
* test_watch_break_dwarf_delay
* test_signal_watch_dwarf
* test_delay_signal_watch_dwarf
* test_signal_delay_watch_dwarf
* test_two_breakpoints_one_watchpoint_dwarf
* test_breakpoints_delayed_breakpoint_one_watchpoint_dwarf
* test_two_watchpoint_threads_dwarf
* test_watchpoint_with_delay_watchpoint_threads_dwarf
* test_two_watchpoints_one_breakpoint_dwarf
* test_two_watchpoints_one_delay_breakpoint_dwarf
* test_watchpoint_delay_watchpoint_one_breakpoint_dwarf
* test_two_watchpoints_one_signal_dwarf
* test_signal_watch_break_dwarf
llvm-svn: 202511
Related to this bug:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15037
Previously this was marked as skipped. I tried running it 10 times in
a row and it failed every time. Switched it to XFAIL.
llvm-svn: 202506
This centralizes the Makefile handling of -install_name and -rpath. It also
moves the cmake build to using @rpath. The reason being that libclang needs it,
and it works for everything else.
A followup patch will move clang to using this and then there will be a single
point to edit to support other systems.
llvm-svn: 202499
A lot of this is writing down common knowledge and things often
communicated on mailing lists and in discussions. It could live in the
Programmer's Manual alternatively, but that felt slightly less
well-fitting.
It also includes (and was motivated by) the section on the relevant
language standards for LLVM and the specific features that will be
enabled with the switch to C++11.
With this, all of the documentation for the C++11 switch is, I think, in
place. I plan to flip the switch RSN. =]
llvm-svn: 202497
X86Operand is extracted into individual header, because it allows to create an
arbitrary memory operand and append it to MCInst. It'll be reused in X86 inline
assembly instrumentation.
Patch by Yuri Gorshenin.
llvm-svn: 202496
standards.
It claims the document intentionally doesn't give fixed standards for
brace placement or spacing, and then the document goes on to do
precisely that in several places. Instead, try to highlight that even
these rules are simply *guidance* which may be trumped by some other
circumstance or the local conventions of code.
I'm not trying to change the thrust of this part of the document, and if
folks think this does so, I'm happy to re-wordsmith it. I just don't
want it to be so self-contradicting.
llvm-svn: 202495
a more modern host C++ toolchain for Linux distros where folks sometimes
don't have a good option to get one as part of their system.
This is a first cut, so feedback, testing, and suggestions are very,
very welcom. This is one of the last real documentation changes that was
specifically requested prior to switching LLVM and Clang to build in
C++11 mode by default.
llvm-svn: 202486
Introduce DDetector interface between the tool and the DD itself.
It will help to experiment with other DD implementation,
as well as reuse DD in other tools.
llvm-svn: 202485
* Align targets of indirect jumps to instruction bundle boundaries (in MI layer).
* Add masking instructions before indirect jumps (in MC layer).
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2847
llvm-svn: 202479
Port the OpenMP runtime to FreeBSD along with associated build system changes.
Also begin to generalize affinity capabilities so they aren't tied explicitly
to Windows and Linux.
The port builds with stock clang and gmake and has no additional runtime
dependencies.
All but a handful of the validation suite tests are now passing on FreeBSD 10
x86_64.
llvm-svn: 202478
A 'remark' is information that is not an error or a warning, but rather some
additional information provided to the user. In contrast to a 'note' a 'remark'
is an independent diagnostic, whereas a 'note' always depends on another
diagnostic.
A typical use case for remark nodes is information provided to the user, e.g.
information provided by the vectorizer about loops that have been vectorized.
This patch provides the initial implementation of 'remarks'. It includes the
actual definiton of the remark nodes, their printing as well as basic parameter
handling. We are reusing the existing diagnostic parameters which means a remark
can be enabled with normal '-Wdiagnostic-name' flags and can be upgraded to
an error using '-Werror=diagnostic-name'. '-Werror' alone does not upgrade
remarks.
This patch is by intention minimal in terms of parameter handling. More
experience and more discussions will most likely lead to further enhancements
in the parameter handling.
llvm-svn: 202475
A 'remark' is information that is not an error or a warning, but rather some
additional information provided to the user. In contrast to a 'note' a 'remark'
is an independent diagnostic, whereas a 'note' always depends on another
diagnostic.
A typical use case for remark nodes is information provided to the user, e.g.
information provided by the vectorizer about loops that have been vectorized.
llvm-svn: 202474
The PPC isel instruction can fold 0 into the first operand (thus eliminating
the need to materialize a zero-containing register when the 'true' result of
the isel is 0). When the isel is fed by a bit register operation that we can
invert, do so as part of the bit-register-operation peephole routine.
llvm-svn: 202469
Todd Fiala