As our delinearization works optimistically, we need in some cases run-time
checks that verify our optimistic assumptions. A simple example is the
following code:
void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < 150; j++)
for (long k = 0; k < 200; k++)
A[i][j][k] = 1.0;
}
After clang linearized the access to A and we delinearized it again to
A[i][j][k] we need to ensure that we do not access the delinearized array
out of bounds (this information is not available in LLVM-IR). Hence, we
need to verify the following constraints at run-time:
CHECK: Assumed Context:
CHECK: [o, m] -> { : m >= 150 and o >= 200 }
llvm-svn: 212198
To translate the old induction variables as they exist before Polly to new
new induction variables introduced during AST code generation we need to
generate code that computes the new values from the old ones. We can do this
by just looking at the arguments isl generates in each scheduled statement.
Example:
// Old
for i
S(i)
// New
for c0
for c1
S(c0 + c1)
To get the value of i, we need to compute 'c0 + c1'. This expression is readily
available in the user statements generated by isl and just needs to be
translated to LLVM-IR.
This replaces an old confusing construct that constructed during ast generation
an isl multi affine expression that described this relation and which was then
again ast generated for each statement and argument when translating the isl ast
to LLVM-IR. This approach was difficult to understand and the additional ast
generation calls where entirely redundant as isl provides the relevant
expressions as arguments of the generated user statements.
llvm-svn: 212186
This change is particularly useful in the code generation as we need
to know which binary operator/identity element we need to combine/initialize
the privatization locations.
+ Print the reduction type for each memory access
+ Adjusted the test cases to comply with the new output format and
to test for the right reduction type
llvm-svn: 212126
Iterate over all store memory accesses and check for valid binary reduction
candidate loads by following the operands of the stored value. For each
candidate pair we check if they have the same base address and there are no
other accesses which may overlap with them. This ensures that no intermediate
value can escape into other memory locations or is overwritten at some point.
+ 17 test cases for reduction detection and reduction dependency modeling
llvm-svn: 211957
Enabling -keep-going in ScopDetection causes expansion to an invalid
Scop candidate.
Region A <- Valid candidate
|
Region B <- Invalid candidate
If -keep-going is enabled, ScopDetection would expand A to A+B because
the RejectLog is never checked for errors during expansion.
With this patch only A becomes a valid Scop.
llvm-svn: 211875
This change will ease the transision to multiple reductions per statement as
we can now distinguish the effects of multiple reductions in the same
statement.
+ Wrapped reduction dependences are used to compute privatization dependences
+ Modified test cases to account for the change
llvm-svn: 211795
This dependency analysis will keep track of memory accesses if they might be
part of a reduction. If not, the dependences are tracked on a statement level.
The main reason to do this is to reduce the compile time while beeing able to
distinguish the effects of reduction and non-reduction accesses.
+ Adjusted two test cases
llvm-svn: 211794
Use a container class to store the reject logs. Delegating most calls to
the internal std::map and add a few convenient shortcuts (e.g.,
hasErrors()).
llvm-svn: 211780
Add support for generating optimization remarks after completing the
detection of Scops.
The goal is to provide end-users with useful hints about opportunities that
help to increase the size of the detected Scops in their code.
By default the remark is unspecified and the debug location is empty. Future
patches have to expand on the messages generated.
This patch brings a simple test case for ReportFuncCall to demonstrate the
feature.
Reports all missed opportunities to increase the size/number of valid
Scops:
clang <...> -Rpass-missed="polly-detect" <...>
opt <...> -pass-remarks-missed="polly-detect" <...>
Reports beginning and end of all valid Scops:
clang <...> -Rpass="polly-detect" <...>
opt <...> -pass-remarks="polly-detect" <...>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4171
llvm-svn: 211769
Due to bad habit we sometimes used a variable %defaultOpts that listed
a set of passes commonly run to prepare for Polly. None of these test cases
actually needs special preparation and only two of them need the 'basicaa' to
be scheduled. Scheduling the required alias analysis explicitly makes the test
cases clearer.
llvm-svn: 211671
We had a set of test cases that have been incomplete and XFAILED. This patch
completes a couple of the interesting ones and removes the ones which seem
redundant or not sufficiently reduced to be useful.
llvm-svn: 211670
Insert a header into the new testcase containing a sample RUN line a FIXME and
an XFAIL. Then insert the formated C code and finally the LLVM-IR without
attributes, the module ID or the target triple.
llvm-svn: 211612
We use llvm.codegen intrinsic to generate code for embedded LLVM-IR
strings. The reason we introduce such a intrinsic is that previous
clang/opt tools was NOT linked with various LLVM targets and their
AsmParsers and AsmPrinters. Since clang/opt been linked with all the
needed libraries, we no longer need the llvm.codegen intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 211573
+ Collect reduction dependences
+ Introduced TYPE_RED in Dependences.h which can be used to obtain the
reduction dependences
+ Used TYPE_RED to prevent parallelization while we do not have a privatizing
code generation
+ Relax the dependences for non-parallel code generation
+ Add privatization dependences to ensure correctness
+ 12 Test cases to check for reduction and privatization dependences
llvm-svn: 211369
+ Flag to indicate reduction like statements
+ Command line option to (dis)allow multiplicative reduction opcodes
+ Two simple positive test cases, one fp test case w and w/o fast math
+ One "negative" test case (only reduction like but no reduction)
llvm-svn: 211114
+ Added const iterator version
+ Changed name to begin/end to allow range loops
+ Changed call sites to range loops
+ Changed typename to (const_)iterator
llvm-svn: 210927
In general this fixes ambiguity that can arise from using
a different namespace that declares the same symbols as
we do.
One example inside llvm would be:
createIndVarSimplifyPass(..);
Which can be found in:
llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h
and
polly/LinkAllPasses.h
llvm-svn: 210755
Fixes#19976.
The error log does not contain an error, in case we reject a candidate
without generating a diagnostic message by using invalid<>(...). This is
the case for the top-level region of a function.
The patch comes without a test-case because adding a useful one requires
additional code just for triggering it. Before the patch it would only trigger,
if we try to print the CFG with Scop error annotations.
llvm-svn: 210753
We do this currently only for test cases where we have integer offsets that
clearly access array dimensions out-of-bound.
-; for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
-; for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
-; for (long k = 0; k < o; k++)
+; for (long i = 0; i < n - 3; i++)
+; for (long j = 4; j < m; j++)
+; for (long k = 0; k < o - 7; k++)
; A[i+3][j-4][k+7] = 1.0;
This will be helpful if we later want to simplify the access functions under the
assumption that they do not access memory out of bounds.
llvm-svn: 210179
Without this patch, the testcase would fail on the delinearization of the second
array:
; void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
; for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
; for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
; for (long k = 0; k < o; k++) {
; A[i+3][j-4][k+7] = 1.0;
; A[i][0][k] = 2.0;
; }
; }
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[3 + i0, -4 + i1, 7 + i2] };
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
Here is the output of FileCheck on the testcase without this patch:
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
^
<stdin>:26:2: note: possible intended match here
[n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[o0] };
^
It is possible to find a good delinearization for A[i][0][k] only in the context
of the delinearization of both array accesses.
There are two ways to delinearize together all array subscripts touching the
same base address: either duplicate the code from scop detection to first gather
all array references and then run the delinearization; or as implemented in this
patch, use the same delinearization info that we computed during scop detection.
llvm-svn: 210117
Rafael Espindola