This is PR33766.
-F name
--filter=name
When creating an ELF shared object, set the internal DT_FILTER field to the specified name. This tells the dynamic linker that the symbol table of the shared object which is being created should be used as a filter on the symbol table of the shared object name.
If you later link a program against this filter object, then, when you run the program, the dynamic linker will see the DT_FILTER field. The dynamic linker will resolve symbols according to the symbol table of the filter object as usual, but it will actually link to the definitions found in the shared object name. Thus the filter object can be used to select a subset of the symbols provided by the object name.
(https://linux.die.net/man/1/ld).
Shared Objects as Filters:
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19683-01/817-3677/chapter4-31738/index.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35352
llvm-svn: 308167
Changes are: got all atomics to accept volatile pointers that allowed
to simplify many type conversions. Windows specific code fixed correspondingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35417
llvm-svn: 308164
We're already using it in 64-bit builds because 64-bit MSVC doesn't support inline assembly.
As far as I know we were using inline assembly because at the time the code was added we had to support MSVC 2008 pre-SP1 while the intrinsic was added to MSVC in SP1. Now that we don't have to support that we should be able to just use the intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 308163
- Extracted the reading of the tokens out into a separate function.
- Replace 'Argument' with 'Parameter' when referring to the identifiers of the macro definition (as opposed to the supplied arguments - MacroArgs - during the macro invocation).
This is in preparation for submitting patches for review to implement __VA_OPT__ which will otherwise just keep lengthening the HandleDefineDirective function and making it less comprehensible.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 308157
LLVM compiler recognizes opportunities to transform a branch into IR select instruction(s) - later it will be lowered into X86::CMOV instruction, assuming no other optimization eliminated the SelectInst.
However, it is not always profitable to emit X86::CMOV instruction. For example, branch is preferable over an X86::CMOV instruction when:
1. Branch is well predicted
2. Condition operand is expensive, compared to True-value and the False-value operands
In CodeGenPrepare pass there is a shallow optimization that tries to convert SelectInst into branch, but it is not enough.
This commit, implements machine optimization pass that converts X86::CMOV instruction(s) into branch, based on a conservative heuristic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34769
llvm-svn: 308142
Some platforms have problems with emmiting constructors when class
templates get explicitly instantiated.
This patch fixes the bug reported in D35315 by replacing `= default`
with an empty constructor body.
llvm-svn: 308140
George Rimar