where either the modification or the other access is unreachable.
This reverts r359984 (which reverted r359962). The bug in clang-tidy's
test suite exposed by the original commit was fixed in r360009.
llvm-svn: 360010
Based on PR41748, not all cases are handled in this function.
llvm_unreachable is treated as an optimization hint than can prune code paths
in a release build. This causes weird behavior when PR41748 is encountered on a
release build. It appears to generate an fp_round instruction from the floating
point code.
Making this a report_fatal_error prevents incorrect optimization of the code
and will instead generate a message to file a bug report.
llvm-svn: 360008
new expression.
This was voted into C++20 as a defect report resolution, so we
retroactively apply it to all prior language modes (though it can never
actually be used before C++11 mode).
llvm-svn: 360006
error: unable to create target: 'No available targets are compatible with triple "< ... any 64-bit target triple ... >"'
I didn't find any 64-bit dependencies for the test and I think removing '-m64' option should fix the problem and allow this test for any target specified by LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE.
Patch by Vlad Vereschaka.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61345
llvm-svn: 360005
When builing the hermetic static library, the compiler switch
-fvisibility-global-new-delete-hidden is necessary to get the new and
delete operator definitions made correctly. However, when those
definitions are not included in the library, then this switch does harm.
With lld (though not all linkers) setting STV_HIDDEN on SHN_UNDEF
symbols makes it an error to leave them undefined or defined via dynamic
linking that should generate PLTs for -shared linking (lld makes this a
hard error even without -z defs). Though leaving the symbols undefined
would usually work in practice if the linker were to allow it (and the
user didn't pass -z defs), this actually indicates a real problem that
could bite some target configurations more subtly at runtime. For
example, x86-32 ELF -fpic code generation uses hidden visibility on
declarations in the caller's scope as a signal that the call will never
be resolved to a PLT entry and so doesn't have to meet the special ABI
requirements for PLT calls (setting %ebx). Since these functions might
actually be resolved to PLT entries at link time (we don't know what the
user is linking in when the hermetic library doesn't provide all the
symbols itself), it's not safe for the compiler to treat their
declarations at call sites as having hidden visibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61572
llvm-svn: 360004
When builing the hermetic static library, the compiler switch
-fvisibility-global-new-delete-hidden is necessary to get the new and
delete operator definitions made correctly. However, when those
definitions are not included in the library, then this switch does harm.
With lld (though not all linkers) setting STV_HIDDEN on SHN_UNDEF
symbols makes it an error to leave them undefined or defined via dynamic
linking that should generate PLTs for -shared linking (lld makes this a
hard error even without -z defs). Though leaving the symbols undefined
would usually work in practice if the linker were to allow it (and the
user didn't pass -z defs), this actually indicates a real problem that
could bite some target configurations more subtly at runtime. For
example, x86-32 ELF -fpic code generation uses hidden visibility on
declarations in the caller's scope as a signal that the call will never
be resolved to a PLT entry and so doesn't have to meet the special ABI
requirements for PLT calls (setting %ebx). Since these functions might
actually be resolved to PLT entries at link time (we don't know what the
user is linking in when the hermetic library doesn't provide all the
symbols itself), it's not safe for the compiler to treat their
declarations at call sites as having hidden visibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61571
llvm-svn: 360003
I'm not sure what i was thinking when i wrote it to point at the directive.
It's at the very least confusing, and in the `for` is very misleading.
We should point at the actual Stmt out of which the exception escapes,
to highlight where it should be fixed e.g. via adding try-catch block.
Yes, this breaks existing NOLINT, which is why this change needs to
happen now, not any later.
llvm-svn: 360002
Matches what we do in other getValueType functions and fixes a null dereference warning in scan-build.
Also cleans up the rest of the function - use auto and standardize the variable names.
llvm-svn: 360000
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41741
Pretty much the same as D61246 and D61106, this time for __complex__ types. Upon
further investigation, I realized that we should regard all types
Type::isScalarType returns true for as primitive, so I merged
isMemberPointerType(), isBlockPointerType() and isAnyComplexType()` into that
instead.
I also stumbled across yet another bug,
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41753, but it seems to be unrelated to
this checker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61569
llvm-svn: 359998
Thus it does not assume that the old basic block is the basic block
for which we are looking at successors.
Not reviewed, but seems rather trivial, in line with the rest of
previous few patches.
llvm-svn: 359997
Summary:
It is a common thing to loop over every `PHINode` in some `BasicBlock`
and change old `BasicBlock` incoming block to a new `BasicBlock` incoming block.
`replaceSuccessorsPhiUsesWith()` already had code to do that,
it just wasn't a function.
So outline it into a new function, and use it.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, spatel, danielcdh
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61013
llvm-svn: 359996
Summary:
There is `PHINode::getBasicBlockIndex()`, `PHINode::setIncomingBlock()`
and `PHINode::getNumOperands()`, but no function to replace every
specified `BasicBlock*` predecessor with some other specified `BasicBlock*`.
Clearly, there are a lot of places that could use that functionality.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, spatel, danielcdh
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61011
llvm-svn: 359995
Summary:
There is `Instruction::getNumSuccessors()`, `Instruction::getSuccessor()`
and `Instruction::setSuccessor()`, but no function to replace every
specified `BasicBlock*` successor with some other specified `BasicBlock*`.
I've found one place where it should clearly be used.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, spatel, danielcdh
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61010
llvm-svn: 359994
Summary:
If `deleteDeadLoop()` is called on such a loop, that has "bad" exit block,
one that e.g. has no terminator instruction, the `DIBuilder::insertDbgValueIntrinsic()`
will be told to insert the Dbg Value Intrinsic after `nullptr`
(since there is no first non-PHI instruction), which will cause it to not insert
those instructions into any basic block. The instructions will be parent-less,
and IR verifier will complain. It is rather obvious to track down the root cause
when that happens, so let's just assert it never happens.
Reviewers: sanjoy, davide, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61008
llvm-svn: 359993
This particular test fails once every so many runs on GreenDragon. Given
that the randomness in the inferior isn't critical to the test, I
removed it in the hopes that it is the cause of the flakiness.
llvm-svn: 359992
Summary: This check appears to be a leftover from when add/sub/mul could be either integer or fp. The NSW/NUW flags are only set for add/sub/mul/shl earlier. And we check that those operations only have integer types just below this. So it seems unnecessary to explicitly error for NUW/NSW being used on a add/sub/mul that have the wrong type that would later error for that.
Reviewers: spatel, dblaikie, jyknight, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61562
llvm-svn: 359987
Summary:
These methods previously took a 0, 1, or 2 to indicate what types were allowed, but the 0 encoding which meant both fp and integer types has been unused for years. Its leftover from when add/sub/mul used to be shared between int and fp
Simplify it by changing it to just a bool to distinquish int and fp.
Reviewers: spatel, dblaikie, jyknight, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61561
llvm-svn: 359986
Summary:
Remove duplicate checks that both operands have the same type. This is checked
before the switch.
Use 'integer' or 'floating-point' instead of 'arithmetic' type. I think this
might be a leftover to the days when floating point and integer operations
shared the same opcodes.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, dblaikie
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61558
llvm-svn: 359985
Summary:
currently for:
```
template<typename ... T>
void f(T... t) {
auto l = [t...]{};
}
```
`clang -ast-print file.cpp`
outputs:
```
template <typename ...T> void f(T ...t) {
auto l = [t] {
}
;
}
```
notice that there is not `...` in the capture list of the lambda. this patch fixes this issue. and add test for it.
Patch by Tyker
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61556
llvm-svn: 359980
Use output constraints for specific general-purpose registers in order
to simplify the tests. They save us from having to manually put
the values in correct registers, and reduce the number of registers
needed as a result.
llvm-svn: 359978
This is a subset of the original commit from rL359879
which was reverted because it could crash when using the 'RemovedInstructions'
structure that enables delayed deletion of dead instructions. The motivating
compile-time win does not require that change though. We should get most of
that win from this change alone.
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359969
* __VA_OPT__ is expanded if the *expanded* __VA_ARGS__ is non-empty,
not if the original argument contained no tokens.
* Placemarkers at the start and end of __VA_OPT__ are retained just
long enough to paste them with adjacent ## operators. We never paste
"across" a discarded placemarker.
llvm-svn: 359964
When a FunctionProtoType is in the original type in a DecayedType, the decayed
type is a PointerType which points back the original FunctionProtoType. The
visitor for ODRHashing will attempt to process both Type's, doing double work.
By chaining together multiple DecayedType's and FunctionProtoType's, this would
result in 2^N Type's visited only N DecayedType's and N FunctionProtoType's
exsit. Another bug where VisitDecayedType and VisitAdjustedType did
redundant work doubled the work at each level, giving 4^N Type's visited. This
patch removed the double work and detects when a FunctionProtoType decays to
itself to only check the Type once. This lowers the exponential runtime to
linear runtime. Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41625
llvm-svn: 359960
Richard Smith