Summary:
This fixes PR17145 and avoids unknown pragma warnings.
This change does not attempt to map MSVC warning numbers to clang
warning flags. Perhaps in the future we will implement a mapping for
some common subset of Microsoft warnings, but for now we don't.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1652
llvm-svn: 190726
This patch adds the following flags covering existing warnings:
-Wgnu-zero-variadic-macro-arguments
-Wgnu-imaginary-constant
-Wgnu-binary-literal
-Wgnu-zero-line-directive
Patch by Peter Lewis.
llvm-svn: 190017
If the user has requested this warning, we should emit it, even if it's not
an extension in the current language mode. However, being an extension is
more important, so prefer the pedantic warning or the pedantic-compatibility
warning if those are enabled.
<rdar://problem/12922063>
llvm-svn: 189110
Various tests had sprung up over the years which had --check-prefix=ABC on the
RUN line, but "CHECK-ABC:" later on. This happened to work before, but was
strictly incorrect. FileCheck is getting stricter soon though.
Patch by Ron Ofir.
llvm-svn: 188174
It turns out that Plum Hall depends on us not emitting an error on
integer literals which fit into long long, but fit into
unsigned long long. So C99 conformance requires not conforming to C99. :)
llvm-svn: 187172
Switch some warnings over to errors which should never have been warnings
in the first place. (Also, a minor fix to the preprocessor rules for
integer literals while I'm here.)
llvm-svn: 186903
and a '!defined(X)' if we find a broken header guard. This is suboptimal; we
should point the diagnostic at the 'X' token not the 'if' token, but it fixes
the crash.
llvm-svn: 184054
properly. This warning checks that the #ifndef and #define directives at
the beginning of a header refer to the same macro name. Includes a fix-it
hint to correct the header guard.
llvm-svn: 183867
This commit improves Clang's diagnostics for string initialization.
Where it would previously say:
/tmp/a.c:3:9: error: array initializer must be an initializer list
wchar_t s[] = "Hi";
^
/tmp/a.c:4:6: error: array initializer must be an initializer list or string literal
char t[] = L"Hi";
^
It will now say
/tmp/a.c:3:9: error: initializing wide char array with non-wide string literal
wchar_t s[] = "Hi";
^
/tmp/a.c:4:6: error: initializing char array with wide string literal
char t[] = L"Hi";
^
As a bonus, it also fixes the fact that Clang would previously reject
this valid C11 code:
char16_t s[] = u"hi";
char32_t t[] = U"hi";
because it would only recognize the built-in types for char16_t and
char32_t, which do not exist in C.
llvm-svn: 181880
Add __has_feature and __has_extension checks for C++1y features (based on the provisional names from
the C++ features study group), and update documentation to match.
llvm-svn: 181342
MSVC provides __wchar_t, either as an alias for the built-in wchar_t
type, or as a separate type depending on language (C vs C++) and flags
(-fno-wchar).
In -fms-extensions, Clang will simply accept __wchar_t as an alias for
whatever type is used for wide character literals. In -fms-compatibility, we
try to mimic MSVC's behavior by always making __wchar_t a builtin type.
This fixes PR15815.
llvm-svn: 181004
This was a suggestion by Jordan Rose since the documented format for these pragmas is without the parentheses. At the same time, I've increased test coverage too for the preprocessed output.
llvm-svn: 179771
handle raw string literals here. C++11 doesn't yet specify how they will
behave, but discussion on core suggests that we should just strip off
everything but the r-char-sequence.
llvm-svn: 176779
continue parsing the directive rather than silently discarding it.
Allowing undef or redef of __TIME__ and __DATE__ is important to folks
who want stable, reproducible builds.
llvm-svn: 176540
This allows people to use Unicode in their #pragma mark and in macros
that exist only to be string-ized.
<rdar://problem/13107323&13121362>
llvm-svn: 174081
People use the C preprocessor for things other than C files. Some of them
have Unicode characters. We shouldn't warn about Unicode characters
appearing outside of identifiers in this case.
There's not currently a way for the preprocessor to tell if it's in -E mode,
so I added a new flag, derived from the PreprocessorOutputOptions. This is
only used by the Unicode warnings for now, but could conceivably be used by
other warnings or even behavioral differences later.
<rdar://problem/13107323>
llvm-svn: 173881
This is a missing piece for C99 conformance.
This patch handles UCNs by adding a '\\' case to LexTokenInternal and
LexIdentifier -- if we see a backslash, we tentatively try to read in a UCN.
If the UCN is not syntactically well-formed, we fall back to the old
treatment: a backslash followed by an identifier beginning with 'u' (or 'U').
Because the spelling of an identifier with UCNs still has the UCN in it, we
need to convert that to UTF-8 in Preprocessor::LookUpIdentifierInfo.
Of course, valid code that does *not* use UCNs will see only a very minimal
performance hit (checks after each identifier for non-ASCII characters,
checks when converting raw_identifiers to identifiers that they do not
contain UCNs, and checks when getting the spelling of an identifier that it
does not contain a UCN).
This patch also adds basic support for actual UTF-8 in the source. This is
treated almost exactly the same as UCNs except that we consider stray
Unicode characters to be mistakes and offer a fixit to remove them.
llvm-svn: 173369
Richard Smith