We just don't need one with the current setup.
We only error on undefined references that are used by some
relocation.
If we managed to relax all uses of __tls_get_addr, no relocation uses
it and we don't produce an error.
This is less code and fixes the case were we fail to relax. Before we
would produce a broken output, but now we produce an error.
llvm-svn: 315334
Its PR34712,
GNU linkers recently changed default values to "both" of "sysv".
Patch do the same for all targets except MIPS, where .gnu.hash
section is not yet supported.
Code suggested by Rui Ueyama.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38407
llvm-svn: 315051
This is in preparation for my next change, which will introduce a relro
nobits section. That requires that relro sections appear at the end of the
progbits part of the r/w segment so that the relro nobits section can appear
contiguously.
Because of the amount of churn required in the test suite, I'm making this
change separately.
llvm-svn: 291523
The module index dynamic relocation R_ARM_DTPMOD32 is always 1 for an
executable. When static linking and when we know that we are not a shared
object we can resolve the module index relocation statically.
The logic in handleNoRelaxTlsRelocation remains the same for Mips as it
has its own custom GOT writing code. For ARM we add the module index
relocation to the GOT when it can be resolved statically.
In addition the type of the RelExpr for the static resolution of TlsGotRel
should be R_TLS and not R_ABS as we need to include the size of
the thread control block in the calculation.
Addresses the TLS part of PR30218.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27213
llvm-svn: 288153
The ARM TLS relocations are placed on literal data and not the
code-sequence, it is therefore not possible to implement the relaxTls*
functions. This change updates handleMipsTlsRelocation() to
handleNoRelaxTlsRelocation() and incorporates ARM as well as Mips.
The ARM support in handleNoRelaxTlsRelocation() currently needs to ouput
the module index dynamic relocation in all cases as it is relying on the
dynamic linker to set the module index in the got.
Should address PR30218
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24827
llvm-svn: 282250
Rafael Espindola