false (not true), so that the CompilerInstance will actually free data
structures when it's done. This fixes a major leak with libclang's
in-process code completion.
llvm-svn: 111457
Now all classes derived from Attr are generated from TableGen.
Additionally, Attr* is no longer its own linked list; SmallVectors or
Attr* are used. The accompanying LLVM commit contains the updates to
TableGen necessary for this.
Some other notes about newly-generated attribute classes:
- The constructor arguments are a SourceLocation and a Context&,
followed by the attributes arguments in the order that they were
defined in Attr.td
- Every argument in Attr.td has an appropriate accessor named getFoo,
and there are sometimes a few extra ones (such as to get the length
of a variadic argument).
Additionally, specific_attr_iterator has been introduced, which will
iterate over an AttrVec, but only over attributes of a certain type. It
can be accessed through either Decl::specific_attr_begin/end or
the global functions of the same name.
llvm-svn: 111455
- Renamed IdempotentOperationChecker::isConstant to isConstantOrPseudoConstant to better reflect the function
- Changed IdempotentOperationChecker::PreVisitBinaryOperator to only run 'CanVary' once on undefined assumptions
- Created new PsuedoConstantAnalysis class and added it to AnalysisContext
- Changed IdempotentOperationChecker to exploit the new analysis
- Updated tests with psuedo-constants
- Added check to IdempotentOperationChecker to see if a Decl is const qualified
llvm-svn: 111426
mangleCallExpression. Also, operator names with unknown arity should
be mangled as binary operators; this is actually covered by an oddly-
positioned sentence in the ABI document. Fixes PR7891.
llvm-svn: 111395
which in a fit of zeal wanted to walk the entire translation unit,
and replace it with a new checker that walks the types of declarations
nested within the class. Also, look into templates when doing this.
llvm-svn: 111357
than GCC 4.2 here when building 32-bit (where GCC will allow
allocation of an array for which we can't get a valid past-the-end
pointer), and emulate its odd behavior in 64-bit where it only allows
63 bits worth of storage in the array. The former is a correctness
issue; the latter is harmless in practice (you wouldn't be able to use
such an array anyway) and helps us pass a GCC DejaGNU test.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8212293>.
llvm-svn: 111338
Sebastian Redl