This patch reapplies commit 76945821b9. The first version broke
buildbots due to clang-tidy test fails. The fails are because some
errors in templates are now diagnosed earlier (does not wait till
instantiation). I have modified the tests to add checks for these
diagnostics/prevent these diagnostics. There are no additional code
changes.
Summary of code changes:
Clang currently crashes for switch statements inside a template when the
condition is a non-integer field member because contextual implicit
conversion is skipped when parsing the condition. This conversion is
however later checked in an assert when the case statement is handled.
The conversion is skipped when parsing the condition because
the field member is set as type-dependent based on its containing class.
This patch sets the type dependency based on the field's type instead.
This patch fixes Bug 40982.
Reviewers: rnk, gribozavr2
Patch by: Elizabeth Andrews (eandrews)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69950
Patch enables import of write-only variables with non-trivial initializers
to fix linker errors. Initializers of imported variables are converted to
'zeroinitializer' to avoid promotion of referenced objects.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70006
__fixunstfti converts a long double (IBM double-double) to an unsigned 128 bit
integer. This patch enables it to handle a previously unhandled case in which
a negative low double may impact the result of the conversion.
Collaborated with @masoud.ataei and @renenkel.
Patch By: Baptiste Saleil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69193
The definition may be mangled while an undefined reference is not.
This may come up when (1) the reference is from a C file or (2) the definition
misses an extern "C".
(2) is more common. Suggest an arbitrary mangled name that matches the
undefined reference, if such a definition exists.
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: foo
>>> referenced by a.o:(.text+0x1)
>>> did you mean to declare foo(int) as extern "C"?
>>> defined in: a1.o
Reviewed By: dblaikie, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69650
When missing an extern "C" declaration, an undefined reference may be
mangled while the definition is not. Suggest the missing
extern "C" and the base name.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69592
Summary:
When downstream LLVM distributions (like AOSP) set the CLANG_VENDOR
cmake variable, the version string printed by the clang driver looks
like:
$ clang --version
[CLANG_VENDOR] clang version X.X.X ([CLANG_REPOSITORY_STRING] sha) (based on LLVM X.X.X)
Rather than the more standard:
$ clang --version
clang version X.X.X ([CLANG_REPOSITORY_STRING] sha)
Based on feedback the the version string is a little long, the trailing
"(based on LLVM X.X.X)" is redundant and makes less sense after moving
LLVM to the monorepo. And it is only added should vendors set the cmake
variable CLANG_VENDOR. Let's remove it.
Reviewers: jyknight, eli.friedman, rsmith, rjmccall, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: arphaman, efriedma, cfe-commits, srhines
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69925
This reverts commit 15bc4dc9a8.
clang-cmake-x86_64-sde-avx512-linux buildbot reported quite a few
compile-time regressions in test-suite, will investigate.
The code that works around SIP was unintentionally being triggered for
/usr/local/bin/python as well. That caused trouble on GreenDragon where
we were swapping out a Python 3 executable with the system's Python 2
executable.
Related to D69686. As noted there, LVI currently behaves differently
for integer and pointer values: For integers, the block value is always
valid inside the basic block, while for pointers it is only valid at
the end of the basic block. I believe the integer behavior is the
correct one, and CVP relies on it via its getConstantRange() uses.
The reason for the special pointer behavior is that LVI checks whether
a pointer is dereferenced in a given basic block and marks it as
non-null in that case. Of course, this information is valid only after
the dereferencing instruction, or in conservative approximation,
at the end of the block.
This patch changes the treatment of dereferencability: Instead of
including it inside the block value, we instead treat it as something
similar to an assume (it essentially is a non-nullness assume) and
incorporate this information in intersectAssumeOrGuardBlockValueConstantRange()
if the context instruction is the terminator of the basic block.
This happens either when determining an edge-value internally in LVI,
or when a terminator was explicitly passed to getValueAt(). The latter
case makes this change not fully NFC, because we can now fold
terminator icmps based on the dereferencability information in the
same block. This is the reason why I changed one JumpThreading test
(it would optimize the condition away without the change).
Of course, we do not want to recompute dereferencability on each
intersectAssume call, so we need a new cache for this. The
dereferencability analysis requires walking the entire basic block
and computing underlying objects of all memory operands. This was
previously done separately for each queried pointer value. In the
new implementation (both because this makes the caching simpler,
and because it is faster), I instead only walk the full BB once and
cache all the dereferenced pointers. So the traversal is now performed
only once per BB, instead of once per queried pointer value.
I think the overall model now makes more sense than before, and there
will be no more pitfalls due to differing integer/pointer behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69914
This patch is motivated by (and factored out from)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66121 which is a debug info bugfix. Starting
with DWARF 5 all Objective-C methods are nested inside their
containing type, and that patch implements this for synthesized
Objective-C properties.
1. SemaObjCProperty populates a list of synthesized accessors that may
need to inserted into an ObjCImplDecl.
2. SemaDeclObjC::ActOnEnd inserts forward-declarations for all
accessors for which no override was provided into their
ObjCImplDecl. This patch does *not* synthesize AST function
*bodies*. Moving that code from the static analyzer into Sema may
be a good idea though.
3. Places that expect all methods to have bodies have been updated.
I did not update the static analyzer's inliner for synthesized
properties to point back to the property declaration (see
test/Analysis/Inputs/expected-plists/nullability-notes.m.plist), which
I believed to be more bug than a feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68108
rdar://problem/53782400
This patch implements a correct, but not terribly useful, transform. In particular, if we have a dynamic alloca in a loop which is guaranteed to execute, and provably not captured, we hoist the alloca out of the loop. The capture tracking is needed so that we can prove that each previous stack region dies before the next one is allocated. The transform decreases the amount of stack allocation needed by a linear factor (e.g. the iteration count of the loop).
Now, I really hope no one is actually using dynamic allocas. As such, why this patch?
Well, the actual problem I'm hoping to make progress on is allocation hoisting. There's a large draft patch out for review (https://reviews.llvm.org/D60056), and this patch was the smallest chunk of testable functionality I could come up with which takes a step vaguely in that direction.
Once this is in, it makes motivating the changes to capture tracking mentioned in TODOs testable. After that, I hope to extend this to trivial malloc free regions (i.e. free dominating all loop exits) and allocation functions for GCed languages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69227
The change itself is straight forward and obvious, but ... there's an existing test checking for exactly the opposite. Both I and Artur think this is simply conservatism in the initial implementation. If anyone bisects a problem to this, a counter example will be very interesting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69907
ShuffleVectorInst::isExtractSubvectorMask, introduced in
[CostModel] Add SK_ExtractSubvector handling to getInstructionThroughput (PR39368)
erroneously thought that
%340 = shufflevector <4 x float> %339, <4 x float> undef, <3 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3, i32 undef>
is a subvector extract, even though it goes off the end of the parent
vector with the undef index. That then caused an assert in
BasicTTIImplBase::getExtractSubvectorOverhead.
This commit fixes that, by not considering the above a subvector
extract.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70005
Change-Id: I87b8b00b24bef19ffc9a1b82ef4eca3b8a246eaf
We lower known CR bit spills (CRSET/CRUNSET) to load and spill the known value
but forgot to remove the redundant spills.
e.g., This sequence was used to spill a CRUNSET:
crclr 4*cr5+lt
mfocrf r3,4
rlwinm r3,r3,20,0,0
stw r3,132(r1)
Custom lowering of known CR bit spills lower it to:
crxor 4*cr5+lt, 4*cr5+lt, 4*cr5+lt
li r3,0
stw r3,132(r1)
crxor is redundant if there is no use of 4*cr5+lt so we should remove it
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67722
The function call and the constructor call fail now several Linux
bots (Swift CI, my own bot and Stella's Debian system), so let's disable
the relevant test parts until we can figure out why it is failing.
Summary:
To be used in `ConstantRange::mulWithNoOverflow()`,
may in future be useful for when saturating shift/mul ops are added.
These are precise as far as i can tell.
I initially though i will need `APInt::[us]mul_sat()` for these,
but it turned out much simpler to do what `ConstantRange::multiply()`
does - perform multiplication in twice the bitwidth, and then truncate.
Though here we want saturating signed truncation.
Reviewers: nikic, reames, spatel
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69994
Summary:
The signed one is needed for implementation of `ConstantRange::smul_sat()`,
unsigned is for completeness only.
Reviewers: nikic, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69993
Summary:
This revision is the last in a series of revisions to return `clang/doc/tools/dump_format_style.py` to be being able to parse Format.h without needing to manually merge the ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst file.
The final modification to dump_format_style.py is needed following the addition of a nested enumeration inside a nested structure following the introduction of {D68296}
Prior related revisions will allow for a fully clang-formatted `clang/include/clang/Format/Format.h` to once again be used at the source.
{D69951}
{D69433}
{D69404}
Reviewers: mitchell-stellar, klimek, sammccall, owenpan
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70003
This required adding support for resolving R_AARCH64_ABS64 relocations to
get accurate addresses for function names to resolve.
Authored by: ianlevesque (Ian Levesque)
Reviewers: dberris, phosek, smeenai, tetsuo-cpp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69967
Summary:
We are using symbols to represent label and csect interchangeably before, and that could be a problem.
There are cases we would need to add storage mapping class to the symbol if that symbol is actually the name of a csect, but it's hard for us to figure out whether that symbol is a label or csect.
This patch intend to do the following:
1. Construct a QualName (A name include the storage mapping class)
MCSymbolXCOFF for every MCSectionXCOFF.
2. Keep a pointer to that QualName inside of MCSectionXCOFF.
3. Use that QualName whenever we need a symbol refers to that
MCSectionXCOFF.
4. Adapt the snowball effect from the above changes in
XCOFFObjectWriter.cpp.
Reviewers: xingxue, DiggerLin, sfertile, daltenty, hubert.reinterpretcast
Reviewed By: DiggerLin, daltenty
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, mgorny, hiraditya, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69633
This recommits 100e797adb (reverted in
009e032634 for failing an assert). While the
root cause was independently reverted in eaff300401,
this commit includes a LIT to make sure IVDescriptor's SinkAfter logic does not
try to sink branch instructions.
Summary:
D23319 introduced python3 compatibility to clang-format.py, this is however not reflected by the documentation in the comments at the beginning of the file, which show how to use the script with python2 in .vimrc. While the actual mapping a user might want to use may well differ from my suggestion, I think it's nice to show the python2 and python3 version, such that a user can pick from the suggestions instead of googeling the python3 replacement for `:pyf` which they might not be familiar with.
EDIT: picking reviewers according to https://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#finding-potential-reviewers
Reviewers: klimek, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, ychen
Patch By: pseyfert
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38446
Melanie Blower