This speeds up the dependency calculations for blocks with many load/store/call instructions.
Beside the improved runtime, there is no functional change.
llvm-svn: 225786
a nested class template for the PassModel, and use the T-suffix for the
two typedefs to match the code in the AnalysisManager.
This is the last of the fairly fundamental code cleanups here. Will be
focusing on the printing of analyses next to finish that aspect off.
llvm-svn: 225785
of templates in the new pass manager.
The analysis manager is now itself just a template predicated on the IR
unit. This makes lots of the templates really trivial and more clear:
they are all parameterized on a single type, the IR unit's type.
Everything else is a function of that. To me, this is a really nice
cleanup of the APIs and removes a layer of 'magic' and 'indirection'
that really wasn't there and just got in the way of understanding what
is going on here.
llvm-svn: 225784
the generic functionality of the pass managers themselves.
In the new infrastructure, the pass "manager" isn't actually interesting
at all. It just pipelines a single chunk of IR through N passes. We
don't need to know anything about the IR or the passes to do this really
and we can replace the 3 implementations of the exact same functionality
with a single generic PassManager template, complementing the single
generic AnalysisManager template.
I've left typedefs in place to give convenient names to the various
obvious instantiations of the template.
With this, I think I've nuked almost all of the redundant logic in the
managers, and I think the overall design is actually simpler for having
single templates that clearly indicate there is no special logic here.
The logging is made somewhat more annoying by this change, but I don't
think the difference is worth having heavy-weight traits to help log
things.
llvm-svn: 225783
Summary:
The Mips ABI's treat pointers in the same way as integers. They are
sign-extended to 32-bit for O32, and 64-bit for N32/N64. This doesn't matter
for O32 and N64 where pointers are already the correct width but it does matter
for big-endian N32, where pointers are 32-bit and need promoting.
The caller side is already passing pointers correctly. This patch corrects the
callee.
Reviewers: vmedic, atanasyan
Reviewed By: atanasyan
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6812
llvm-svn: 225782
In the following:
void f(int x) { extern int x; }
The second declaration of 'x' shouldn't be considered a redeclaration of
the parameter.
llvm-svn: 225780
As a result, installations of LLVM in non-standard locations
will not require passing custom -ccopt -L flags when building
the binary, nor absolute paths would be embedded in the cma/cmxa
files. Additionally, the executables will not require changes
to LD_LIBRARY_PATH, although CAML_LD_LIBRARY_PATH still
has to be set for ocamlc without -custom.
See http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=6642.
Note that the patch is approved, but not merged yet.
It will be released in 4.03 and likely 4.02.
llvm-svn: 225778
The EOF token injection technique is preferable to using
isBeforeInTranslationUnit to determine whether or not additional cleanup
is needed. I don't have an example off-hand that requires it but it is
nicer nonetheless.
llvm-svn: 225776
We'd crash trying to make the SourceRange for the tokens we'd like to
highlight. Don't assume there is more than one token makes up the
default argument.
llvm-svn: 225774
it will do the right thing on x86 routines with a mid-function
epilogue sequence (where the unwind rules need to be reinstalled
after the epilogue has completed).
<rdar://problem/19417410>
llvm-svn: 225773
Peephole optimizer is scanning a basic block forward. At some point it
needs to answer the question "given a pointer to an MI in the current
BB, is it located before or after the current instruction".
To perform this, it keeps a set of the MIs already seen during the scan,
if a MI is not in the set, it is assumed to be after.
It means that newly created MIs have to be inserted in the set as well.
This commit passes the set as an argument to the target-dependent
optimizeSelect() so that it can properly update the set with the
(potentially) newly created MIs.
llvm-svn: 225772
which will verify if the eh_frame instructions include details about
the prologue or not. Both clang and gcc include prologue instructions
but there's no requirement for them to do so -- and I'm sure we'll
have to interoperate with a compiler that doesn't generate prologue
info at some point.
I don't have any compilers that omit the prologue instructions so the
testing was of the "makre sure augmented unwind info is still created".
With an eh_frame without prologue, this code should reject the
augmentation scheme altogether and we should fall back to using assembly
instruction profiling.
llvm-svn: 225771
step through the complete function looking for any epilogue
instructions. If we find an epilogue sequence, re-instate
the correct unwind instructions if there is more code past
that epilogue -- this will correctly handle an x86 function
with multiple epilogues in it.
NB there is still a bug with the "eh_frame augmented"
UnwindPlans and mid-function epilogues. Looking at that next.
<rdar://problem/18863406>
llvm-svn: 225770
PECOFF was the only user of the API, and the reason why we created
the API is because, although the driver creates a list of input files,
it has no knowledge on what files are being created. It was because
everything was hidden behind the InputGraph abstraction.
Now the driver knows what that's doing. We no longer need this
indirection to get the file list being processed.
llvm-svn: 225767
Mark the end of the method body with an EOF token, collect it once we
expect to be done with method body parsing. No functionality change
intended.
llvm-svn: 225765
There are two things in a C++ program that need to read the vtable pointer:
Constructors and destructors. (A few other operations -- virtual calls,
dynamic cast, rtti -- read the vtable pointer off a this pointer, but for
this they don't need the vtable symbol.) Implicit constructors and destructors
and explicit constructors already marked the vtable as used, but explicit
destructors didn't.
Note that the only thing sema's "mark a class's vtable used" does is to mark all
final overriders of the class as referenced, it does _not_ cause emission of
the vtable itself. This is done on demand by codegen, independent of sema,
since sema might emit functions that are not referenced. (The exception are
vtables that are forced via key functions -- these are forced onto codegen
by sema.)
This bug went unnoticed for years because it doesn't have observable effects
(yet -- I want to change this in PR20337, which is why I noticed this).
r213109 made it so that _calls_ to constructors don't mark the vtable used.
Currently, _calls_ to destructors still mark the vtable used. If that
wasn't the case, this program would tickle the problem:
test.h:
template <typename T>
struct B {
int* p;
virtual ~B() { delete p; }
virtual void f() {}
};
struct __attribute__((visibility("default"))) C {
C();
B<int> m;
};
test2.cc:
#include "test.h"
int main() {
C* c = new C;
delete c;
}
test3.cc:
#include "test.h"
C::C() {}
# This bin/clang++ binary doesn't MarkVTableUsed() for virtual dtor calls:
$ bin/clang++ -shared test3.cc -std=c++11 -O2 -fvisibility=hidden \
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -o libtest3.dylib
$ bin/clang++ test2.cc -std=c++11 -O2 -fvisibility=hidden \
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden libtest3.dylib
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"B<int>::f()", referenced from:
vtable for B<int> in test2-af8f4f.o
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
What's happening here is that there's a copy of B's vtable hidden in
libtest3.dylib, because C's constructor caused an implicit instantiation of that
(and implicit constructors generate vtables).
test2.cc calls C's destructDr, which destroys the B<int> member,
which wants to overwrite the vtable back to B (think of B as the base of a class
hierarchy, and of hierarchical destruction -- maybe we shouldn't do the vtable
writing in destructors of final classes), but there's nothing in test2.cc that
marks B's vtable used. So codegen writes out the vtable, but since it wasn't
marked used, sema didn't mark all the virtual functions (in particular f())
as used.
Note that this change makes us reject programs we didn't reject before (see
the included Sema test case), but both gcc and cl also reject this code, and
clang used to reject it before r213109.
llvm-svn: 225761
The functions {pred,succ,use,user}_{begin,end} exist, but many users
have to check *_begin() with *_end() by hand to determine if the
BasicBlock or User is empty. Fix this with a standard *_empty(),
demonstrating a few usecases.
llvm-svn: 225760
AAELF specifies a number of ELF specific relocation types which have custom
prefixes for the symbol reference. Switch the parser to be more table driven
with an idea of file formats for which they apply. NFC.
llvm-svn: 225758
template.
This consolidates three copies of nearly the same core logic. It adds
"complexity" to the ModuleAnalysisManager in that it makes it possible
to share a ModuleAnalysisManager across multiple modules... But it does
so by deleting *all of the code*, so I'm OK with that. This will
naturally make fixing bugs in this code much simpler, etc.
The only down side here is that we have to use 'typename' and 'this->'
in various places, and the implementation is lifted into the header.
I'll take that for the code size reduction.
The convenient names are still typedef-ed and used throughout so that
users can largely ignore this aspect of the implementation.
The follow-up change to this will do the exact same refactoring for the
PassManagers. =D
It turns out that the interesting different code is almost entirely in
the adaptors. At the end, that should be essentially all that is left.
llvm-svn: 225757
This name is less descriptive, but it sort of puts things in the
'llvm.frame...' namespace, relating it to frameallocate and
frameaddress. It also avoids using "allocate" and "allocation" together.
llvm-svn: 225752
even though every basic source character literal has the same numerical value
as a narrow or wide character literal.
It appears that the FreeBSD folks are trying to use this macro to mean
something other than what the relevant standards say it means, but their usage
is conforming, so put up with it.
llvm-svn: 225751
The terminal window will be opened under the ownership
of the real userid and it won't be able to open the
socket talking back to lldb -- the testsuite will hang
here.
The same thing probably should be done for lldb when run
on a remote system over ssh. I added a line for that
but commented it out for now because I haven't
tested it.
llvm-svn: 225748
These intrinsics allow multiple functions to share a single stack
allocation from one function's call frame. The function with the
allocation may only perform one allocation, and it must be in the entry
block.
Functions accessing the allocation call llvm.recoverframeallocation with
the function whose frame they are accessing and a frame pointer from an
active call frame of that function.
These intrinsics are very difficult to inline correctly, so the
intention is that they be introduced rarely, or at least very late
during EH preparation.
Reviewers: echristo, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6493
llvm-svn: 225746
This adds back the testcase from r225738, and adds to it. Looks like we
need both sides for now (the assertion was incorrect both ways, and
although it seemed reasonable (when written correctly) it wasn't
particularly important).
llvm-svn: 225745
so has clang-format. Notably, this fixes a bunch of formatting in the
CGSCC pass manager side of things that has been improved in clang-format
recently.
llvm-svn: 225743
This reverts commit r225738. Maybe the assertion is just plain wrong,
but this version fails on WAY more bots. I'll make sure both ways work
in a follow-up but I want to get bots green in the meantime.
llvm-svn: 225742
Templates don't have key functions (cf computeKeyFunction() in
RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp), so don't have something that looks like one.
Also, instead of a vcall to force generation of the vtable, just construct
the object. This is how the repro on PR5557 (what the test is for) worked too.
llvm-svn: 225741
Instead, just present the command for committing it. This way,
the user can test the merge locally, resolve conflicts, etc.
before committing, which seems much safer to me.
llvm-svn: 225737
Erik Eckstein