the information on to Sema. There's still an incorrectness in the way template instantiation
works now, but that is due to a far larger underlying representational problem.
Also add a test case for various list initialization cases of scalars, which test this
commit as well as the previous one.
llvm-svn: 140460
Allow empty initializer lists for scalars, which mean value-initialization.
Constant evaluation for single-element and empty initializer lists for scalars.
Codegen for empty initializer lists for scalars.
Test case comes in next commit.
llvm-svn: 140459
This fixes a few errors when parsing MFC code with clang.
BTW clang trunk is now about 5 patches away to be able the parse the default wizard-generated MFC project.
llvm-svn: 140452
The token stream was not getting properly reset when leaving
ParseLexedMethodDef in some error cases. In the testcase, that caused later
accesses to the token stream to touch memory which had been freed as we
finished parsing the class definition. Major hat-tip to AddressSanitizer for
helping pinpoint the use-after-free, including the allocation and deallocation
points:
==21510== ERROR: AddressSanitizer heap-use-after-free on address 0x7feb3de87848 at pc 0x249f4e2 bp 0x7fff15a89df0 sp 0x7fff15a89ce0
READ of size 1 at 0x7feb3de87848 thread T0
#0 0x249f4e2 clang::TokenLexer::Lex()
#1 0x1c834a0 clang::Parser::ConsumeToken()
#2 0x1c7dc0f clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition()
#3 0x1c7e16b clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition()
<snip>
0x7feb3de87848 is located 1992 bytes inside of 3816-byte region [0x7feb3de87080,0x7feb3de87f68)
freed by thread T0 here:
#0 0x3a22c19 free
#1 0x1d136a1 clang::Parser::LexedMethod::~LexedMethod()
#2 0x1cef528 clang::Parser::DeallocateParsedClasses()
#3 0x1cef676 clang::Parser::PopParsingClass()
#4 0x1cea094 clang::Parser::ParseCXXMemberSpecification()
#5 0x1ce7ae5 clang::Parser::ParseClassSpecifier()
#6 0x1cfe588 clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationSpecifiers()
#7 0x1c7dbe8 clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition()
#8 0x1c7e16b clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition()
<snip>
previously allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x3a2302d realloc
#1 0x39d7c97 llvm::SmallVectorBase::grow_pod()
#2 0x1ac588e llvm::SmallVectorImpl<>::push_back()
#3 0x1d12d8b clang::Parser::ConsumeAndStoreUntil()
#4 0x1c9c24d clang::Parser::ConsumeAndStoreUntil()
#5 0x1d12c1e clang::Parser::ConsumeAndStoreUntil()
#6 0x1c9c24d clang::Parser::ConsumeAndStoreUntil()
#7 0x1d10042 clang::Parser::ParseCXXInlineMethodDef()
#8 0x1cec51a clang::Parser::ParseCXXClassMemberDeclaration()
#9 0x1ce9de5 clang::Parser::ParseCXXMemberSpecification()
#10 0x1ce7ae5 clang::Parser::ParseClassSpecifier()
#11 0x1cfe588 clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationSpecifiers()
#12 0x1c7dbe8 clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition()
#13 0x1c7e16b clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition()
<snip>
llvm-svn: 140427
merging for overrides. One might want to make a method's availability
in a superclass different from that of its subclass. Fixes
<rdar://problem/10166223>.
llvm-svn: 140406
is cast to a boolean. An exception has been made for string literals in
logical expressions to allow the common case of use in assert statements.
bool x;
x = "hi"; // Warn here
void foo(bool x);
foo("hi"); // Warn here
assert(0 && "error");
assert("error); // Warn here
llvm-svn: 140405
the key function is inline, rather than the original
declaration. Perhaps FunctionDecl::isInlined() is poorly named. Fixes
<rdar://problem/9979458>.
llvm-svn: 140400
The solution is to create a new ParseScope(Scope::TemplateParamScope) for each template scope that we want to reenter. (from the outmost to the innermost scope)
This fixes some errors when parsing MFC code with clang.
llvm-svn: 140344
This moves the existing code for CPATH into the driver and adds the environment lookup and path splitting there.
The paths are then passed down to cc1 with -I options (CPATH), added after the normal user-specified include dirs.
Language specific paths are passed via -LANG-isystem and the actual filtering is performed in the frontend.
I tried to match GCC's behavior as close as possible
Fixes PR8971.
llvm-svn: 140341
OpenCL 6.2.1 says: "Implicit conversions between built-in vector data types are
disallowed." OpenCL 6.2.2 says: "Explicit casts between vector types are not
legal." For example:
uint4 u = (uint4)(1);
int4 i = u; // invalid implicit conversion
int4 e = (int4)u; // invalid explicit conversion
Fixes PR10967. Submitted by: Anton Lokhmotov <Anton.lokhmotov@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 140300
OpenCL is different from AltiVec in the way it supports vector literals. OpenCL
is strict with regards to semantic checks. For example, implicit conversions
and explicit casts between vectors of different types are disallowed.
Fixes PR10975. Submitted by: Anton Lokhmotov <Anton.lokhmotov@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 140270
if the definition has a non-variadic prototype with compatible
parameters. Therefore, the default rule for such calls must be to
use a non-variadic convention. Achieve this by casting the callee to
the function type with which it is required to be compatible, unless
the target specifically opts out and insists that unprototyped calls
should use the variadic rules. The only case of that I'm aware of is
the x86-64 convention, which passes arguments the same way in both
cases but also sets a small amount of extra information; here we seek
to maintain compatibility with GCC, which does set this when calling
an unprototyped function.
Addresses PR10810 and PR10713.
llvm-svn: 140241
presence of an implicit move assignment operator. I think the implicit
copy assignment operator case was also wrong, but just in a "displaying
the wrong diagnostic" way.
llvm-svn: 140139
of false positive warnings that depend on noreturn destructors pruning
the CFGs, but only in C++0x mode!
This was really surprising as the debugger quickly reveals that the
attributes are parsed correctly (and using the same code) in both modes.
The warning fires in the same way in both modes. But between parsing and
building the destructor declaration with the noreturn attribute and the
warning, it magically disappears. The key? The 'noexcept' appears!
When we were rebuilding the destructor type with the computed implicit
noexcept we completely dropped the old type on the floor. This almost
makes sense (as the arguments and return type to a destructor aren't
exactly unpredictable), but lost any function type attributes as well.
The fix is simple, we build the new type off of the old one rather than
starting fresh.
Testing this is a bit awkward. I've done it by running the
noreturn-sensitive tests in both modes, which previous failed and now
passes, but if anyone has ideas about how to more specifically and
thoroughly test that the extended info on a destructor is preserved when
adding noexcept, I'm all ears.
llvm-svn: 140138
check whether the requested location points inside the precompiled preamble,
in which case the returned source location will be a "loaded" one.
llvm-svn: 140060
This model uses the 'landingpad' instruction, which is pinned to the top of the
landing pad. (A landing pad is defined as the destination of the unwind branch
of an invoke instruction.) All of the information needed to generate the correct
exception handling metadata during code generation is encoded into the
landingpad instruction.
The new 'resume' instruction takes the place of the llvm.eh.resume intrinsic
call. It's lowered in much the same way as the intrinsic is.
llvm-svn: 140049
For instance:
template <class T> void E() {};
class F {};
void test() {
::E<::F>();
E<::F>();
}
Gives the following error messages:
error: found '<::' after a template name which forms the
digraph '<:' (aka '[') and a ':', did you mean '< ::'?
::E<::F>();
^~~
< ::
error: expected expression
E<::F>();
^
error: expected ']'
note: to match this '['
E<::F>();
This patch adds the digraph fix-it check right before the name lookup,
moves the shared checking code to a new function, and adds new
tests to catch future regressions.
llvm-svn: 140039
We were failing to set source locations and ranges in isUnusedResultAWarning
for CXXOperatorCallExprs, leading to an "expression result unused" warning
with absolutely no context if the expression was inside a macro.
llvm-svn: 140036
Sebastian Redl