Most users would be surprised if "isCOFF" and "isMachO" were simultaneously
true, unless they'd put the compiler in a box with a gun attached to a photon
detector.
This makes sure precisely one of the three formats is true for any triple and
simplifies some target logic based on that.
llvm-svn: 196934
immediately after SSE scalar fp instructions like addss or mulss.
Added patterns to select SSE scalar fp arithmetic instructions from a scalar
fp operation followed by a blend.
For example, given the following code:
__m128 foo(__m128 A, __m128 B) {
A[0] += B[0];
return A;
}
previously we generated:
addss %xmm0, %xmm1
movss %xmm1, %xmm0
now we generate:
addss %xmm1, %xmm0
llvm-svn: 196925
Save S2(reg 18) only when we are calling floating point stubs that
have a return value of float or complex. Some more work to make this
better but this is the first step.
llvm-svn: 196921
One unusual feature of the z architecture is that the result of a
previous load can be reused indefinitely for subsequent loads, even if
a cache-coherent store to that location is performed by another CPU.
A special serializing instruction must be used if you want to force
a load to be reattempted.
Since volatile loads are not supposed to be omitted in this way,
we should insert a serializing instruction before each such load.
The same goes for atomic loads.
The patch implements this at the IR->DAG boundary, in a similar way
to atomic fences. It is a no-op for targets other than SystemZ.
llvm-svn: 196906
One unusual feature of the z architecture is that the result of a
previous load can be reused indefinitely for subsequent loads, even if
a cache-coherent store to that location is performed by another CPU.
A special serializing instruction must be used if you want to force
a load to be reattempted.
Since volatile loads are not supposed to be omitted in this way,
we should insert a serializing instruction before each such load.
The same goes for atomic loads.
The patch implements this at the IR->DAG boundary, in a similar way
to atomic fences. It is a no-op for targets other than SystemZ.
llvm-svn: 196905
For stack frames requiring realignment, three pointers may be needed:
- ebp to address incoming arguments
- esi (could be any callee-saved register) to address locals
- esp to address outgoing arguments
We would use esi unconditionally without verifying that it did not
conflict with inline assembly.
This change doesn't do the verification, it simply emits a fatal error
on functions that use stack realignment, dynamic SP adjustments, and
inline assembly.
Because stack realignment is common on Windows, we also no longer assume
that MS inline assembly clobbers esp. Instead, we analyze the inline
instructions for implicit definitions and check if esp is there. If so,
we require the use of a base pointer and consider it in the condition
above.
Mostly fixes PR16830, but we could try harder to find a non-conflicting
base pointer.
Reviewers: sunfish
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1317
llvm-svn: 196876
Patch by Jiangning Liu.
With some test case changes:
- intrinsic test added to the existing /test/CodeGen/AArch64/neon-aba-abd.ll.
- New test cases to cover movi 1D scenario without using the intrinsic in
test/CodeGen/AArch64/neon-mov.ll.
llvm-svn: 196806
Summary:
The MSA ld.[bhwd] and st.[bhwd] instructions scale the immediate by the
element size before use as an offset. The offset must therefore be a
multiple of the element size to be valid in these instructions. However,
an unaligned base address is valid in MSA.
This commit causes the compiler to emit valid code when the calculated
offset is not a multiple of the element size by accounting for the offset
using addiu and using a zero offset in the load/store.
Depends on D2338
Reviewers: matheusalmeida
Reviewed By: matheusalmeida
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2339
llvm-svn: 196777
Summary:
The immediate in these instructions is scaled before use as an offset.
They therefore have a wider reach than ld.b/st.b.
Reviewers: matheusalmeida
Reviewed By: matheusalmeida
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2338
llvm-svn: 196775
As we can't make a complete solution now it has been decided to enable .set directive to handle long jump expressions. This will cause parser to report errors when parsing integer based register assignments, for example:
.set r3, will be reported as error. Still, the need for expressions is higher priority as the integer based register assignments are Mips specific and can be avoided using register names.
llvm-svn: 196773
When trying to eliminate an "sub sp, sp, #N" instruction by folding
it into an existing push/pop using dummy registers, we need to account
for the fact that this might affect precisely how "fp" gets set in the
prologue.
We were attempting this, but assuming that *whenever* we performed a
fold it would make a difference. This is false, for example, in:
push {r4, r7, lr}
add fp, sp, #4
vpush {d8}
sub sp, sp, #8
we can fold the "sub" into the "vpush", forming "vpush {d7, d8}".
However, in that case the "add fp" instruction mustn't change, which
we were getting wrong before.
Should fix PR18160.
llvm-svn: 196725
They were out of place since the introduction of arbitrary precision integer
types.
This also synchronizes the documentation to Types.h, so it refers to first class
types and single value types.
llvm-svn: 196661
- krait processor currently modeled with the same features as A9.
- Krait processor additionally has VFP4 (fused multiply add/sub)
and hardware division features enabled.
- krait has currently the same Schedule model as A9
- krait cpu flag is not recognized by the GNU assembler yet,
it is replaced with march=armv7-a to avoid a lower march
from being used.
llvm-svn: 196619
The current peephole optimizing for compare inst assumes an instr that
uses CPSR has an MO for ARM Cond code.However, for VSEL instructions
(vseqeq, vselgt, vselgt, vselvs), there is no such operand nor do
they support the modification of Cond Code.
llvm-svn: 196588
Since z has no setcc instruction as such, the choice of setBooleanContents
is a bit arbitrary. Currently it's set to ZeroOrOneBooleanContent,
so we produced a branch-free form when selecting between 0 and 1,
but not when selecting between 0 and -1. This patch handles the latter
case too.
At some point I'd like to measure whether it's better to use conditional
moves for constant selects on z196, but that's future work.
llvm-svn: 196578
Tim Northover