Don't replace shifts greater than the type with the maximum shift.
This isn't hit anywhere in the tests, and somewhere else is replacing
these with undef.
llvm-svn: 207000
For now it contains a single flag, SanitizeAddress, which enables
AddressSanitizer instrumentation of inline assembly.
Patch by Yuri Gorshenin.
llvm-svn: 206971
This implements the core functionality necessary to remove an edge from
the call graph and correctly update both the basic graph and the SCC
structure. As part of that it has to run a tiny (in number of nodes)
Tarjan-style DFS walk of an SCC being mutated to compute newly formed
SCCs, etc.
This is *very rough* and a WIP. I have a bunch of FIXMEs for code
cleanup that will reduce the boilerplate in this change substantially.
I also have a bunch of simplifications to various parts of both
algorithms that I want to make, but first I'd like to have a more
holistic picture. Ideally, I'd also like more testing. I'll probably add
quite a few more unit tests as I go here to cover the various different
aspects and corner cases of removing edges from the graph.
Still, this is, so far, successfully updating the SCC graph in-place
without disrupting the identity established for the existing SCCs even
when we do challenging things like delete the critical edge that made an
SCC cycle at all and have to reform things as a tree of smaller SCCs.
Getting this to work is really critical for the new pass manager as it
is going to associate significant state with the SCC instance and needs
it to be stable. That is also the motivation behind the return of the
newly formed SCCs. Eventually, I'll wire this all the way up to the
public API so that the pass manager can use it to correctly re-enqueue
newly formed SCCs into a fresh postorder traversal.
llvm-svn: 206968
up the stack finishing the exploration of each entries children before
we're finished in addition to accounting for their low-links. Added
a unittest that really hammers home the need for this with interlocking
cycles that would each appear distinct otherwise and crash or compute
the wrong result. As part of this, nuke a stale fixme and bring the rest
of the implementation still more closely in line with the original
algorithm.
llvm-svn: 206966
parents of an SCC, and add a lookup method for finding the SCC for
a given function. These aren't used yet, but will be used shortly in
some unit tests I'm adding and are really part of the broader intended
interface for the analysis.
llvm-svn: 206959
This model is not final and work is still in progress.
However there are substantial improvements on integer tests mainly because of better RAL with new scheduler.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3451
llvm-svn: 206957
Use -stats to see how many loops were analyzed for possible vectorization and how many of them were actually vectorized.
Patch by Zinovy Nis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3438
llvm-svn: 206956
resisted this for too long. Just with the basic testing here I was able
to exercise the analysis in more detail and sift out both type signature
bugs in the API and a bug in the DFS numbering. All of these are fixed
here as well.
The unittests will be much more important for the mutation support where
it is necessary to craft minimal mutations and then inspect the state of
the graph. There is just no way to do that with a standard FileCheck
test. However, unittesting these kinds of analyses is really quite easy,
especially as they're designed with the new pass manager where there is
essentially no infrastructure required to rig up the core logic and
exercise it at an API level.
As a minor aside about the DFS numbering bug, the DFS numbering used in
LCG is a bit unusual. Rather than numbering from 0, we number from 1,
and use 0 as the sentinel "unvisited" state. Other implementations often
use '-1' for this, but I find it easier to deal with 0 and it shouldn't
make any real difference provided someone doesn't write silly bugs like
forgetting to actually initialize the DFS numbering. Oops. ;]
llvm-svn: 206954
AArch64 has feature predicates for NEON, FP and CRYPTO instructions.
This allows the compiler to generate code without using FP, NEON
or CRYPTO instructions.
llvm-svn: 206949
the Callee list. This is going to be quite important to prevent removal
from going quadratic. No functionality changed at this point, this is
one of the refactoring patches I've broken out of my initial work toward
mutation updates of the call graph.
llvm-svn: 206938
This prompted me to push references through most of DwarfDebug. Sorry
for the churn.
Honestly it's a bit silly that we're passing around units all over the
place like that anyway and I think it's mostly due to the DIE attribute
adding utility functions being utilities in DwarfUnit. I should have
another go at moving them out of DwarfUnit...
llvm-svn: 206925
from places like MCCodeEmitter() in the MC backend when the
MCContext is const.
I was going to use this in my change for r206669 but Jim convinced
me to use an assert there. But this still is a good tweak.
llvm-svn: 206923
r206916 was not logically the same as the previous code because the
goto statements did not create loop. This should be the same as the
previous code.
llvm-svn: 206918
Goto statements jumping into previous inner blocks are pretty confusing
to read even though in this case they are valid. No reason to not use
while loops there.
llvm-svn: 206916
In the case where the constant comes from a cloned cast instruction, the
materialization code has to go before the cloned cast instruction.
This commit fixes the method that finds the materialization insertion point
by making it aware of this case.
This fixes <rdar://problem/15532441>
llvm-svn: 206913
diagnostic that includes location information.
Currently if one has this assembly:
.quad (0x1234 + (4 * SOME_VALUE))
where SOME_VALUE is undefined ones gets the less than
useful error message with no location information:
% clang -c x.s
clang -cc1as: fatal error: error in backend: expected relocatable expression
With this fix one now gets a more useful error message
with location information:
% clang -c x.s
x.s:5:8: error: expected relocatable expression
.quad (0x1234 + (4 * SOME_VALUE))
^
To do this I plumbed the SMLoc through the MCObjectStreamer
EmitValue() and EmitValueImpl() interfaces so it could be used
when creating the MCFixup.
rdar://12391022
llvm-svn: 206906
Matt Arsenault