implicitly instantiable, even if we don't see a body on the friend
function declaration. The body may simply have not yet been attached.
This fixes PR10666.
There may be an alternate, preferred implementation strategy, see my
FIXME. Review would definitely be appreciated Doug. =D
llvm-svn: 137934
has already been loaded before allocating a new Module structure. If
the module has already been loaded (uniquing based on file name), then
just return the existing module rather than trying to load it again.
This allows us to load a DAG of modules. Introduce a simple test case
that forms a diamond-shaped module graph, and illustrates that a
source file importing the bottom of the diamond can see declarations
in all four of the modules that make up the diamond.
llvm-svn: 137925
-import-module) vs. loaded because some other module depends on
them. As part of doing this, pass down the module that caused a module
to be loaded directly, rather than assuming that we're loading a
chain. Finally, write out all of the directly-loaded modules when
serializing an AST file (using the new IMPORTS record), so that an AST
file can depend on more than one other AST file, all of which will be
loaded when that AST file is loaded. This allows us to form and load a
tree of modules, but we can't yet load a DAG of modules.
llvm-svn: 137923
Currently this includes -pedantic warnings as well; we'll need to consider whether these should
be included.
This works as expected with -Werror.
Test cases were added to Sema/warn-unused-parameters.c, but they should probably be broken off into
their own test file.
llvm-svn: 137910
The Container USR's CXString had its underlying data owned by the CXTranslationUnit's string pool. This
would result in trying to access freed memory.
llvm-svn: 137887
all AST files have a normal METADATA record that has the same form
regardless of whether we refer to a chained PCH or any other kind of
AST file.
Introduce the IMPORTS record, which describes all of the AST files
that are imported by this AST file, and how (as a module, a PCH file,
etc.). Currently, we emit at most one entry to this record, to support
chained PCH.
llvm-svn: 137869
automatically invoking llvm-gcc's cc1plus, which doesn't support all options
supported by Clang. Therefore, filter out unsupported options.
rdar://9964354
llvm-svn: 137842
even when overloaded and user-defined. These operators are both more
valuable to warn on (due to likely typos) and extremely unlikely to be
reasonable for use to trigger side-effects.
llvm-svn: 137823
-Wunused was a mistake. It resulted in duplicate warnings and lots of
other hacks. Instead, this should be a special sub-category to
-Wunused-value, much like -Wunused-result is.
Moved to -Wunused-comparison, moved the implementation to piggy back on
the -Wunused-value implementation instead of rolling its own, different
mechanism for catching all of the "interesting" statements.
I like the unused-value mechanism for this better, but its currently
missing several top-level statements. For now, I've FIXME-ed out those
test cases. I'll enhance the generic infrastructure to catch these
statements in a subsequent patch.
This patch also removes the cast-to-void fixit hint. This hint isn't
available on any of the other -Wunused-value diagnostics, and if we want
it to be, we should add it generically rather than in one specific case.
llvm-svn: 137822
code is very likely to be buggy, but its going to require more
significant changes on the part of the user to correct it in this case.
llvm-svn: 137820
a complement to the warnings we provide in condition expressions. Much
like we warn on conditions such as:
int x, y;
...
if (x = y) ... // Almost always a typo of '=='
This warning applies the complementary logic to "top-level" statements,
or statements whose value is not consumed or used in some way:
int x, y;
...
x == y; // Almost always a type for '='
We also mirror the '!=' vs. '|=' logic.
The warning is designed to fire even for overloaded operators for two reasons:
1) Especially in the presence of widespread templates that assume
operator== and operator!= perform the expected comparison operations,
it seems unreasonable to suppress warnings on the offchance that
a user has written a class that abuses these operators, embedding
side-effects or other magic within them.
2) There is a trivial source modification to silence the warning for
truly exceptional cases:
(void)(x == y); // No warning
A (greatly reduced) form of this warning has already caught a number of
bugs in our codebase, so there is precedent for it actually firing. That
said, its currently off by default, but enabled under -Wall.
There are several fixmes left here that I'm working on in follow-up
patches, including de-duplicating warnings from -Wunused, sharing code
with -Wunused's implementation (and creating a nice place to hook
diagnostics on "top-level" statements), and handling cases where a proxy
object with a bool conversion is returned, hiding the operation in the
cleanup AST nodes.
Suggestions for any of this code more than welcome. Also, I'd really
love suggestions for better naming than "top-level".
llvm-svn: 137819
Argyrios Kyrtzidis