This is a followup to [1] which added a new `__debug_less::operator()` overload.
[2] added `_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_AFTER_CXX17` to the original
`__debug_less::operator()` between the time of writing [1] and landing it. This
change adds `_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_AFTER_CXX17` to the new overload too.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/rL358423
[2] https://reviews.llvm.org/rL358252
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60724
llvm-svn: 358725
Default RegionStore bindings represent values that can be obtained by loading
from anywhere within the region, not just the specific offset within the region
that they are said to be bound to. For example, default-binding a character \0
to an int (eg., via memset()) means that the whole int is 0, not just
that its lower byte is 0.
Even though memset and bzero were modeled this way, it didn't work correctly
when applied to simple variables. Eg., in
int x;
memset(x, 0, sizeof(x));
we did produce a default binding, but were unable to read it later, and 'x'
was perceived as an uninitialized variable even after memset.
At the same time, if we replace 'x' with a variable of a structure or array
type, accessing fields or elements of such variable was working correctly,
which was enough for most cases. So this was only a problem for variables of
simple integer/enumeration/floating-point/pointer types.
Fix loading default bindings from RegionStore for regions of simple variables.
Add a unit test to document the API contract as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60742
llvm-svn: 358722
Generally having spurious `\n` doesn't matter, but here the
returning string is a command which is executed, so we want
to strip it. Pointed out by Jason.
llvm-svn: 358717
This adds legalization for G_SEXT, G_ZEXT, and G_ANYEXT for v8s8s.
We were falling back on G_ZEXT in arm64-vabs.ll before, preventing us from
selecting the @llvm.aarch64.neon.sabd.v8i8 intrinsic.
This adds legalizer support for those 3, which gives us selection via the
importer. Update the relevant tests (legalize-ext.mir, select-int-ext.mir) and
add a GISel line to arm64-vabs.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60881
llvm-svn: 358715
Summary: The requires directive containing target related clauses must appear before any target region in the compilation unit.
Reviewers: ABataev, AlexEichenberger, caomhin
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60875
llvm-svn: 358709
On configurations with -Werror,-Wmissing-field-initializers, the commit does not compile. This commit fixes the offending line.
Original Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60408
llvm-svn: 358705
Add close_fd_mask functionality to AFL driver.
Summary:
Add support for env var AFL_DRIVER_CLOSE_FD_MASK which behaves
the same as libFuzzer's -close_fd_mask=1.
Also add tests.
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka, morehouse
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60334
llvm-svn: 358703
Prior to this patch, each basic block listed in the extrack-blocks-file
would be extracted to a different function.
This patch adds the support for comma separated list of basic blocks
to form group.
When the region formed by a group is not extractable, e.g., not single
entry, all the blocks of that group are left untouched.
Let us see this new format in action (comments are not part of the
file format):
;; funcName bbName[,bbName...]
foo bb1 ;; Extract bb1 in its own function
foo bb2,bb3 ;; Extract bb2,bb3 in their own function
bar bb1,bb4 ;; Extract bb1,bb4 in their own function
bar bb2 ;; Extract bb2 in its own function
Assuming all regions are extractable, this will create one function and
thus one call per region.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60746
llvm-svn: 358701
Summary:
The serial backend performs all tasks serially and does not require
threads. It does not have any dependencies beyond normal C++, but
it is not very efficient either.
Reviewers: rodgert, MikeDvorskiy
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59791
llvm-svn: 358700
Summary: This revision allows users to specify independent changes to multiple (related) sections of the input. Previously, only a single section of input could be selected for replacement.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: jfb, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60408
llvm-svn: 358697
Summary:
It's never set to true. Its only effect would be to set stdout to binary mode.
Hopefully we have better ways of doing this by now :-)
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60871
llvm-svn: 358696
combineVectorTruncationWithPACKUS is currently splitting the upper bit bit masking into 128-bit subregs and then concatenating them back together.
This was originally done to avoid regressions that caused existing subregs to be concatenated to the larger type just for the AND masking before being extracted again. This was fixed by @spatel (notably rL303997 and rL347356).
This also lets SimplifyDemandedBits do some further improvements before it hits the recursive depth limit.
My only annoyance with this is that we were broadcasting some xmm masks but we seem to have lost them by moving to ymm - but that's a known issue as the logic in lowerBuildVectorAsBroadcast isn't great.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60375#inline-539623
llvm-svn: 358692
Summary:
This file defines the *Stencil* abstraction: a code-generating object, parameterized by named references to (bound) AST nodes. Given a match result, a stencil can be evaluated to a string of source code.
A stencil is similar in spirit to a format string: it is composed of a series of raw text strings, references to nodes (the parameters) and helper code-generation operations.
See thread on cfe-dev list with subject "[RFC] Easier source-to-source transformations with clang tooling" for background.
Reviewers: sbenza
Reviewed By: sbenza
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, mgorny, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59371
llvm-svn: 358691
Summary:
Ensure we re-export __cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length and
__cxa_uncaught_exceptions from libc++, since they are now
provided by libc++abi.
Doing this allows us to stop linking explicitly against libc++abi in
the libc++abi tests, since libc++ re-exports all the necessary symbols.
However, there is one caveat to that. We don't want libc++ to re-export
__cxa_uncaught_exception (the singular form), since it's only provided
for backwards compatibility. Hence, for the single test where we check
this backwards compatibility, we explicitly link against libc++abi.
PR27405
PR22654
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60424
llvm-svn: 358690
Summary:
Currently clang-format uses ContinuationIndent to indent the contents of a raw
string literal that is the last parameter of the function call. This is to
achieve formatting similar to trailing:
```
f(1, 2, R"pb(
x: y)pb");
```
However this had the unfortunate consequence of producing format like this:
```
fffffff(1, 2,
R"pb(
a: b
)pb");
```
This patch makes clang-format consider indenting a trailing raw string param
after a newline based off the start of the format delimiter, producing:
```
fffffff(1, 2,
R"pb(
a: b
)pb");
```
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60558
llvm-svn: 358689
The bug is that I didn't check whether the operand of the invariant_loads were themselves invariant. I don't know how this got missed in the patch and review. I even had an unreduced test case locally, and I remember handling this case, but I must have lost it in one of the rebases. Oops.
llvm-svn: 358688
Summary:
Emit framework's dSYM bundle as LLDB.framework.dSYM instead of LLDB.dSYM, because the latter could conflict with the driver's lldb.dSYM when emitted in the same directory on case-insensitive file systems.
Requires https://reviews.llvm.org/D60862
Reviewers: friss, beanz, bogner
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60863
llvm-svn: 358686
Summary:
Extra flexibility for emitting debug info to external files (remains Darwin only for now).
LLDB needs this functionality to emit a LLDB.framework.dSYM instead of LLDB.dSYM when building the framework, because the latter could conflict with the driver's lldb.dSYM when emitted in the same directory on case-insensitive file systems.
Reviewers: friss, bogner, beanz
Subscribers: mgorny, aprantl, llvm-commits, #lldb
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60862
llvm-svn: 358685
The purpose of this patch is to eliminate a pass ordering dependence between LoopPredication and LICM. To understand the purpose, consider the following snippet of code inside some loop 'L' with IV 'i'
A = _a.length;
guard (i < A)
a = _a[i]
B = _b.length;
guard (i < B);
b = _b[i];
...
Z = _z.length;
guard (i < Z)
z = _z[i]
accum += a + b + ... + z;
Today, we need LICM to hoist the length loads, LoopPredication to make the guards loop invariant, and TrivialUnswitch to eliminate the loop invariant guard to establish must execute for the next length load. Today, if we can't prove speculation safety, we'd have to iterate these three passes 26 times to reduce this example down to the minimal form.
Using the fact that the array lengths are known to be invariant, we can short circuit this iteration. By forming the loop invariant form of all the guards at once, we remove the need for LoopPredication from the iterative cycle. At the moment, we'd still have to iterate LICM and TrivialUnswitch; we'll leave that part for later.
As a secondary benefit, this allows LoopPred to expose peeling oppurtunities in a much more obvious manner. See the udiv test changes as an example. If the udiv was not hoistable (i.e. we couldn't prove speculation safety) this would be an example where peeling becomes obviously profitable whereas it wasn't before.
A couple of subtleties in the implementation:
- SCEV's isSafeToExpand guarantees speculation safety (i.e. let's us expand at a new point). It is not a precondition for expansion if we know the SCEV corresponds to a Value which dominates the requested expansion point.
- SCEV's isLoopInvariant returns true for expressions which compute the same value across all iterations executed, regardless of where the original Value is located. (i.e. it can be in the loop) This implies we have a speculation burden to prove before expanding them outside loops.
- invariant_loads and AA->pointsToConstantMemory are two cases that SCEV currently does not handle, but meets the SCEV definition of invariance. I plan to sink this part into SCEV once this has baked for a bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60093
llvm-svn: 358684
Summary:
This patch removes the "//----" frames and "///" leading lines from
docstring comments. We already have code doing transformations like this in
modify-python-lldb.py, but that's a script I'd like to remove. Instead
of running these transformations everytime we run swig, we can just
perform equivalent on its input once.
This patch can be reproduced (e.g. for downstream merges) with the
following "sweet" perl command:
perl -i -p -e 'BEGIN{ $/ = undef;} s:(" *\n) *//-----*\n:\1:gs; s:^( *)/// ?:\1:gsm; s:^ *//------*\n( *\n)?( *"):\2:gsm; s: *$::gsm; s:\n *"\):"):gsm' scripts/interface/*.i
This command produces nearly equivalent python files to those produced
by the relevant code in modify-python-lldb.py. The only difference I
noticed is that here I am slightly more agressive in removing trailing
newlines from docstring comments (the python script seems to leave
newlines in class-level docstrings).
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg, jingham, aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60498
llvm-svn: 358683
The change landed in r358657 broke some of the buildbots because they
use an older version of Python 2 that raises this error.
```
File "/Volumes/data/dev/llvm/upstream/master/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/scripts/asan_symbolize.py", line 509
exec(f.read(), globals_space, None)
SyntaxError: unqualified exec is not allowed in function 'load_plugin_from_file' it contains a nested function with free variables
```
I can reproduce this problem when using Python 2.7.6.
To workaround this some indirection has been added to prevent the broken
(the line at fault would never be executed) SyntaxError error in old
Python versions from being raised.
rdar://problem/49476995
llvm-svn: 358682
Summary:
The immediate post dominator of the loop header may be part of the divergent loop.
Since this /was/ the divergence propagation bound the SDA would not detect joins of divergent paths outside the loop.
Reviewers: nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: mmasten, arsenm, jvesely, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59042
llvm-svn: 358681
isSafeToExpand was making a common, but dangerously wrong, mistake in assuming that if any instruction within a basic block executes, that all instructions within that block must execute. This can be trivially shown to be false by considering the following small example:
bb:
add x, y <-- InsertionPoint
call @throws()
udiv x, y <-- SCEV* S
br ...
It's clearly not legal to expand S above the throwing call, but the previous logic would do so since S dominates (but not properlyDominates) the block containing the InsertionPoint.
Since iterating instructions w/in a block is expensive, this change special cases two cases: 1) S is an operand of InsertionPoint, and 2) InsertionPoint is the terminator of it's block. These two together are enough to keep all current optimizations triggering while fixing the latent correctness issue.
As best I can tell, this is a silent bug in current ToT. Given that, there's no tests with this change. It was noticed in an upcoming optimization change (D60093), and was reviewed as part of that. That change will include the test which caused me to notice the issue. I'm submitting this seperately so that anyone bisecting a problem gets a clear explanation.
llvm-svn: 358680
This used to be guarded on whether the deployment target was greater
than macosx10.8, however testing against the dylibs for 10.8 and earlier
with the function enabled works too. The revision that introduced
__pad_and_output is r164241 and it does not mention a reason for the
guard.
llvm-svn: 358677
There are barely any lines I haven't changed in these files, so I think I could
might as well leave it in an LLVM coding style conforming state. I also renamed
2 functions and moved addDependency out of line to ease on followup patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59457
llvm-svn: 358676
Thomas Anderson