C++11 allows this qualifiers to exist on function types when used in
template arguments. Previously, I believed it wasn't possible because
MSVC rejected declarations like: S<int () const &> s;
However, it turns out MSVC properly allows them in using declarations;
updated clang to be compatible with this mangling.
llvm-svn: 215464
The build file was trying to use LIBCXX_VERSION, which isn't set
anywhere, and also forgot to split the 'compile_flags' list.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4860
llvm-svn: 215463
v2: drop enum keyword
use correct extension mode
don't bother computing the sign in unsinged case
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
llvm-svn: 215462
v2: add tests
rename LowerSDIV24 to LowerSDIVREM24
handle the rem part in this function
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
llvm-svn: 215460
Added llgs/debugserver gdb-remote tests around SIGABRT and SIGSEGV signal reception
notification. Found a few bugs in exception signal handling in Linux llgs. Fixed those.
llvm-svn: 215458
An optional third field was added to `llvm.global_ctors` (and
`llvm.global_dtors`) in r209015. Most of the code has been changed to
deal with both versions of the variables. Users of the C API might
create either version, the helper functions in LLVM create the two-field
version, and clang now creates the three-field version.
However, the BitcodeReader was changed to always upgrade to the
three-field version. This created an unnecessary inconsistency in the
IR before/after serializing to bitcode.
This commit resolves the inconsistency by making the third field truly
optional (and not upgrading in the bitcode reader). Since `llvm-link`
was relying on this upgrade code, rather than deleting it I've moved it
into `ModuleLinker`, where it upgrades these arrays as necessary to
resolve inconsistencies between modules.
The ideal resolution would be to remove the 2-field version and make the
third field required. I filed PR20506 to track that.
I changed `test/Bitcode/upgrade-global-ctors.ll` to a negative test and
duplicated the `llvm-link` check in `test/Linker/global_ctors.ll` to
check both upgrade directions.
Since I came across this as part of PR5680 (serializing use-list order),
I've also added the missing `verify-uselistorder` RUN line to
`test/Bitcode/metadata-2.ll`.
llvm-svn: 215457
We already verified the primary module map file (either the one that
defines the top-level module, or the one that allows inferring it if it
is an inferred framework module). Now we also verify any other module
map files that define submodules, such as when there is a
module.private.modulemap file.
llvm-svn: 215455
I initially thought I could implement COMDATs with aliases by just
internalizing GVs instead of dropping them. This is a counter
example: Internalizing one of the @a would make @b and @c point
to different variables.
llvm-svn: 215447
According to the gcc docs, -include uses the current working directory
for the lookup instead of the main source file.
This patch gets rid of NormalizeIncludePath (which relied on an
implementation detail of FileManager / FileEntry for the include path
logic to work), and instead hands the correct lookup information down to
LookupFile.
This will allow us to change the FileEntry's behavior regarding its Name
caching.
llvm-svn: 215433
The combiner ignored DBG nodes when checking
the uses of a virtual register.
It combined a sequence like
%vreg1 = madd %vreg2, %vreg3,...
DBG_VALUE (%vreg1 ...)
%vreg4 = add %vreg1,...
to
%vreg4 = madd %vreg2, %vreg3
leaving behind a dangling DBG_VALUE with
a definition. This triggered an assertion
in the MachineTraceMetrics.cpp module.
llvm-svn: 215431
Type::dump() doesn't print a newline, which makes for a poor
experience in a debugger. This looks like it was an ommission
considering Value::dump() two lines above, so I've changed Type to add
a newline as well.
Of the two in-tree callers, one added a newline anyway, and I've
updated the other one to use Type::print instead.
llvm-svn: 215421
refactoring in 215384. This way it can unique multiple entries describing
the same piece even if they don't have the exact same location.
(The same piece may get merged in and be added from OpenRanges).
There ought to be a more elegant solution for this, though.
llvm-svn: 215418
This patch removes the use of the "%c" specifier for getting/setting times.
The semantics of this specifier differ between linux and Mac. I don't believe
the use of this specifier was important to the test.
The following tests now pass on linux.
test/input.output/iostream.format/ext.manip/get_time.pass.cpp
test/input.output/iostream.format/ext.manip/put_time.pass.cpp
llvm-svn: 215417
First, avoid calling setTailCall(false) on musttail calls. The funciton
prototypes should be "congruent", so the shadow layout should be exactly
the same.
Second, avoid inserting instrumentation after a musttail call to
propagate the return value shadow. We don't need to propagate the
result of a tail call, it should already be in the right place.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4331
llvm-svn: 215415
This patch just adds the required return statements to slice_array::operator=
and mask_array::operator=.
Tests were added to check that the return value is the same as the object assigned
to.
llvm-svn: 215414
No functional change. To be used in future commits that need to look
for such instructions.
Reviewed By: rafael
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4504
llvm-svn: 215413
as long as possible.
** Context **
Each time the dominance information is modified, the dominator tree analysis
switches in a slow query mode. After a few queries without any modification on
the dominator tree, it performs an expensive update of its internal structure to
provide fast queries again.
** Problem **
Prior to this patch, the MachineSink pass was splitting the critical edges on
demand while relying heavy on the dominator tree information. In some cases,
this leads to pathological behavior where:
- We end up in the slow query mode right after splitting an edge.
- We update the dominance information.
- We break the dominance information again, thus ending up in the slow query
mode and so on.
** Proposed Solution **
To mitigate this effect, this patch postpones all the splitting of the edges at
the end of each iteration of the main loop.
The benefits are:
- The dominance information is valid for the life time of an iteration.
- This simplifies the code as we do not have to special treat instructions that
are sunk on critical edges. Indeed, the related block will be available
through the next iteration.
The downside is that when edges splitting is required, this incurs an additional
iteration of the main loop compared to the previous scheme.
** Performance **
Thanks to this patch, the motivating example compiles in 6+ minutes instead of
10+ minutes. No test case added as the motivating example as nothing special but
being huge!
I have measured only noise for both the compile time and the runtime on the llvm
test-suite + SPECs with Os and O3.
Note: The current implementation of MachineBasicBlock::SplitCriticalEdge also
uses the dominance information and therefore, hits this problem. A subsequent
patch will address that.
<rdar://problem/17894619>
llvm-svn: 215410
Hans Wennborg