We referred to all declaration in definitions in our diagnostic messages
which is can be inaccurate. Instead, classify the declaration and emit
an appropriate diagnostic for the new declaration and an appropriate
note pointing to the old one.
This fixes PR24116.
llvm-svn: 242190
attribute properly and avoid bogus warning. This is
an objective-c fix only. objective-c++ follows different code
pass and requires separate fix (which will come at a later time).
Fixes radar 7214820.
llvm-svn: 95571
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
The idea is to segregate Objective-C "object" pointers from general C pointers (utilizing the recently added ObjCObjectPointerType). The fun starts in Sema::GetTypeForDeclarator(), where "SomeInterface *" is now represented by a single AST node (rather than a PointerType whose Pointee is an ObjCInterfaceType). Since a significant amount of code assumed ObjC object pointers where based on C pointers/structs, this patch is very tedious. It should also explain why it is hard to accomplish this in smaller, self-contained patches.
This patch does most of the "heavy lifting" related to moving from PointerType->ObjCObjectPointerType. It doesn't include all potential "cleanups". The good news is additional cleanups can be done later (some are noted in the code). This patch is so large that I didn't want to include any changes that are purely aesthetic.
By making the ObjC types truly built-in, they are much easier to work with (and require fewer "hacks"). For example, there is no need for ASTContext::isObjCIdStructType() or ASTContext::isObjCClassStructType()! We believe this change (and the follow-up cleanups) will pay dividends over time.
Given the amount of code change, I do expect some fallout from this change (though it does pass all of the clang tests). If you notice any problems, please let us know asap! Thanks.
llvm-svn: 75314
in merge_types. It is incomplete. We probably want to issue
a warning if user attempts to change the attribute from __weak to
__strong or vice-vera. It also assumes that a __weak/__strong
attribute can not be specified with other (currently one) type
attriute.
llvm-svn: 72711
properties at the moment:
1. It allows stuff like "__strong id x; __weak id x;".
2. For constructs like "__strong id x; id x;", subsequent references to
x lose the objc_gc attribute.
3. This incorrectly allows merges involving the address_space attribute.
4. Constructs like "id x; /* some code using x */ __weak id x;" don't
apply the objc_gc attribute consistently to all uses of x.
The first three can probably be fixed relatively easily; the fourth
would be extremely difficult to fix.
llvm-svn: 72683
David Majnemer