They're already defined in ia32intrin.h, and this would cause including Intrin.h
in 64-bit mode to fail because of conflicting types. Update ms-intrin.cpp to
also run in 64-bit mode to catch things like this.
llvm-svn: 203714
This started failing for me the last time someone modified the AST file
format. It would be nice if we could just have lit take care of the
module cache used during testing for us, but this helps in the meantime.
llvm-svn: 203511
Summary:
Our usual definition of max_align_t wouldn't match up with MSVC if it
was used in a template argument.
Reviewers: chandlerc, rsmith, rnk
Reviewed By: chandlerc
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2924
llvm-svn: 202911
This breaks backwards compatibility with existing code. Previously, this
was defined as
#define _mm_prefetch(a, sel) (__builtin_prefetch((void *)(a), 0, (sel)))
Which basically accepts any pointer. Changing this to char* simply
breaks a lot of existing code. I have tried changing char* to
"const void*", which seems to be the right thing as per Intel
specification this should work on basically any pointer. However,
apparently this breaks windows compatibility (because of a conflicting
declaration in windows.h).
So, we probably need to #ifdef this based on whether clang is compiling
for windows. According to Chandler, this might be done by introducing an
additional symbol to a fake type in BuiltinsX86.def and then condition
the type expansion on the platform.
llvm-svn: 201775
This patch adds several built-ins that are required for ms
compatibility. _mm_prefetch must be a built-in because it takes a
compile-time constant argument and our prior approach of using a #define
to the current built-in doesn't work in the presence of re-declaration
of _mm_prefetch. The others can be obtained by including the windows
system headers. If a user includes the windows system headers but not
intrin.h they still need to work and therefore must be built-in because
we don't get a chance to implement them in intrin.h in this case.
llvm-svn: 201734
This definition is not chosen idly. There is an unfortunate reality with
max_align_t -- the specific nature of its definition leaks into the ABI
almost immediately. Because it is part of C11 and C++11 it becomes
essential for it to match with other systems on that ABI. There is an
effort to discourage any further use of this construct as a consequence
-- using max_align_t introduces an immediate ABI problem. We can never
update it to have larger alignment even as the microarchitecture changes
to necessitate higher alignment. =/
The particular definition here exactly matches the ABI of GCC's chosen
::max_align_t definition, for better or worse. This was written with the
help of Richard Smith who was decoding the exact ABI implications of the
selected definition in GCC. Notably, in-register arguments are impacted
by the particular definition chosen. =/
No one is under the illusion that this is a "good" or "useful"
definition of max_align_t, and we are working with the standards
committee to specify a more useful interface to address this need.
llvm-svn: 201729
PR18322. This test will be reenabled when the SDK gets fixed. In the meantime,
it is pretty disruptive to have this test keep failing.
llvm-svn: 200256
The part that checks that certain functions are marked deprecated doesn't
seem that useful, and it has the bad effect that the test hard-coded the
locations of the notes from that test.
llvm-svn: 199441
This ports the last Sema tests over to use the frontend directly, and adds a
local lit substitution to disable inappropriate %clang usage under this
directory.
llvm-svn: 199348
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
Summary:
These are deprecated in VS 2012 according to MSDN. They don't actually
compile down to any code. They prevent the compiler from reordering
memory accesses across the barrier, which is what a memory-clobbering
volatile asm does.
Reviewers: echristo
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1954
llvm-svn: 192860
is no need to go through the driver indirection here, and it clutters
things up as dependencies can sneak in for specific things the driver is
doing.
llvm-svn: 191107
We already reject flags that don't have the CC1Option flag,
but we would previously do so after parsing the command-line
arguments.
Since the option parser now has a parameter for excluding options,
we should just use that instead.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1270
llvm-svn: 187668
This adds a test to make sure we define _WCHAR_T_DEFINED and
_NATIVE_WCHAR_T_DEFINED correctly in the preprocessor, and updates
stddef.h to set it when typedeffing wchar_t.
llvm-svn: 180918
- We shouldn't even try to include stdint.h in hosted mode, as the dependency
on even parsing a platforms stdint.h might fail for some targets.
llvm-svn: 179723
implementation of C99's attempt to control the C++ standard. *sigh*
The C99 standard says that certain macros in <stdint.h>, such as SIZE_MAX,
should not be defined when the header is included in C++ mode, unless
__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS are defined. The C++11 standard
says "Thanks, but no thanks" and C11 removed this rule, but various C library
implementations (such as glibc) follow C99 anyway.
g++ prior to 4.8 worked around the C99 / glibc behavior by defining
__STDC_*_MACROS in <cstdint>, which was incorrect, because <stdint.h> is
supposed to provide these macros too. g++ 4.8 works around it by defining
__STDC_*_MACROS in its builtin <stdint.h> header.
This change makes Clang act like g++ 4.8 in this regard: our <stdint.h> now
countermands any attempt by the C library to implement the undesired C99 rules,
by defining the __STDC_*_MACROS first. Unlike g++, we do this even in C++98
mode, since that was the intent of the C++ committee, matches the behavior
required in C11, and matches our built-in implementation of <stdint.h>.
llvm-svn: 179419
being included in C++. Don't define alignof or alignas in this case. Note that
the C++11 standard is broken in various ways here (it refers to the contents
of <stdalign.h> in C99, where that header did not exist, and doesn't mention
the alignas macro at all), but we do our best to do what it intended.
llvm-svn: 175708
Xcode-style clang builds only support Xcode's architectures, so mips
isn't available and the driver tries to use gcc instead. cc1 will go
ahead and do -fsyntax-only for any platform it knows about even if it
can't actually compile.
llvm-svn: 164742
This also adds a definition for uint64_t, which was causing build failures
on some platforms. (I'm actually surprised this didn't happen on more
builders, but maybe the search paths are different.)
llvm-svn: 164706
Hans Wennborg