Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Trieu 553b2b2e5d Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string and
diagnostic message are compared.  If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given.  This gives rise to an unexpected case:

  // expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}

will match the following error messages from Clang:

  candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
  candidate function has different number of parameters

It will also match these other error messages:

  candidate function
  function has different number of parameters
  number of parameters

This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting.  Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected.  Some stats from this cleanup:

87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)

llvm-svn: 146619
2011-12-15 00:38:15 +00:00
Douglas Gregor b10646d4ce Improve diagnostics like "initializing <type> from an expression of
type..." with "initializing <type> with an expression of type...",
which reads better. Thanks to John for the improved wording.

llvm-svn: 100873
2010-04-09 17:53:29 +00:00
Douglas Gregor c68e140657 Improve diagnostics when we fail to convert from a source type to a
destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as

t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
      expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
  char *name = __func__;
        ^      ~~~~~~~~

We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:

t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
      'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
  char *name = __func__;
        ^      ~~~~~~~~

Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.

llvm-svn: 100832
2010-04-09 00:35:39 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
Fariborz Jahanian 0399c1c9c0 Change tests to use clang -cc1...
llvm-svn: 91297
2009-12-14 17:36:25 +00:00
Steve Naroff 1329fa0ed9 Implement the ObjC pseudo built-in types as clang "BuiltinType's". I say pseudo built-in types, since Sema still injects a typedef for recognition (i.e. they aren't truly built-ins from a parser perspective).
This removes the static data/methods on ObjCObjectPointerType while preserving the nice API (no need to fiddle with ASTContext:-).

This patch also adds Type::isObjCBuiltinType().

This should be the last fairly large patch related to recrafting the ObjC type system. The follow-on patches should be fairly small.

llvm-svn: 75808
2009-07-15 18:40:39 +00:00
Steve Naroff 7cae42b07a This patch includes a conceptually simple, but very intrusive/pervasive change.
The idea is to segregate Objective-C "object" pointers from general C pointers (utilizing the recently added ObjCObjectPointerType). The fun starts in Sema::GetTypeForDeclarator(), where "SomeInterface *" is now represented by a single AST node (rather than a PointerType whose Pointee is an ObjCInterfaceType). Since a significant amount of code assumed ObjC object pointers where based on C pointers/structs, this patch is very tedious. It should also explain why it is hard to accomplish this in smaller, self-contained patches.

This patch does most of the "heavy lifting" related to moving from PointerType->ObjCObjectPointerType. It doesn't include all potential "cleanups". The good news is additional cleanups can be done later (some are noted in the code). This patch is so large that I didn't want to include any changes that are purely aesthetic.

By making the ObjC types truly built-in, they are much easier to work with (and require fewer "hacks"). For example, there is no need for ASTContext::isObjCIdStructType() or ASTContext::isObjCClassStructType()! We believe this change (and the follow-up cleanups) will pay dividends over time. 

Given the amount of code change, I do expect some fallout from this change (though it does pass all of the clang tests). If you notice any problems, please let us know asap! Thanks.

llvm-svn: 75314
2009-07-10 23:34:53 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar a45cf5b6b0 Rename clang to clang-cc.
Tests and drivers updated, still need to shuffle dirs.

llvm-svn: 67602
2009-03-24 02:24:46 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 08d96d5182 Fix a minor typo in the handling of the conditional operator for Objective-C interface pointers
llvm-svn: 60096
2008-11-26 06:43:45 +00:00
Steve Naroff 8afa98916a Downgrade incompatibilities with objc qualified types (e.g. id <P>) to warnings.
Note: One day, we should consider moving the actual diags to ObjCQualifiedIdTypesAreCompatible(), since it has more information on the actual problem. GCC currently emits slightly more instructive errors for some cases involving protocols. I added a FIXME to the code.

llvm-svn: 57529
2008-10-14 22:18:38 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar de1ec9cdcd Improve type-checking of ?: for Objective-C types.
- Allow any Objective-C object types to devolve to type id in a ?:
   expression. This matches gcc behavior more closely.

llvm-svn: 55705
2008-09-03 17:53:25 +00:00