interface methods isCOFF().
The '-coff' command line option has been removed. It was not used in any
test cases.
The patch reviewed by Michael Spencer.
llvm-svn: 208157
The current state of affairs has auxiliary symbols described as a big
bag of bytes. This is less than satisfying, it detracts from the YAML
file as being human readable.
Instead, allow for symbols to optionally contain their auxiliary data.
This allows us to have a much higher level way of describing things like
weak symbols, function definitions and section definitions.
This depends on D3105.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3092
llvm-svn: 204214
This compiles with no changes to clang/lld/lldb with MSVC and includes
overloads to various functions which are used by those projects and llvm
which have OwningPtr's as parameters. This should allow out of tree
projects some time to move. There are also no changes to libs/Target,
which should help out of tree targets have time to move, if necessary.
llvm-svn: 203083
None of the object file formats reported error on iterator increment. In
retrospect, that is not too surprising: no object format stores symbols or
sections in a linked list or other structure that requires chasing pointers.
As a consequence, all error checking can be done on begin() and end().
This reduces the text segment of bin/llvm-readobj in my machine from 521233 to
518526 bytes.
llvm-svn: 200442
These records are mandatory for executables and are used by the loader.
Reviewers: rafael
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D939
llvm-svn: 183852
This is part of a future patch to use yamlio that incorrectly ended up in a
cleanup patch.
Thanks to Benjamin Kramer for reporting it.
llvm-svn: 179938
I couldn't touch this file and not clean it up some. These reformattings
brought to you by clang-format, with some minor adjustments by me. More
spring cleaning to follow here.
llvm-svn: 179004
internal linkage and so wasn't a patent bug, it doesn't make any sense
here. We can avoid even calling operator<< by just embedding the newline
in the string literals that were already being streamed out. It also
gives the impression of some line-ending agnosticisms which is not
present, and that flushing happens when it doesn't.
If we want to use std::endl, we could do that, but honestly it doesn't
seem remotely worth it. Using '\n' directly is much more clear when
working with raw_ostream.
It also happens to fix builds with old crufty GCC STL implementations
that include std::endl into the global namespace (or headers written to
be compatible with such atrocities).
llvm-svn: 179003
Simon Atanasyan