we did was an acceptable lookup. If it is, then we can re-use that
lookup result. If it isn't, we have to perform the lookup again. This
is almost surely the cause behind the mysterious typo.m failures on
some builders; we were getting the wrong lookup results returned.
llvm-svn: 116586
of a binary expression, continue on and parse the right-hand side of
the binary expression anyway, but don't call the semantic actions to
type-check. Previously, we would see the error and then, effectively,
skip tokens until the end of the statement.
The result should be more useful recovery, both in the normal case
(we'll actually see errors beyond the first one in a statement), but
it also helps code completion do a much better job, because we do
"real" code completion on the right-hand side of an invalid binary
expression rather than completing with the recovery completion. For
example, given
x = p->y
if there is no variable named "x", we can still complete after the p->
as a member expression. Along the recovery path, we would have
completed after the "->" as if we were in an expression context, which
is mostly useless.
llvm-svn: 114225
sends. These are far trickier than instance messages, because we
typically have something like
NSArray alloc]
where it appears to be a declaration of a variable named "alloc" up
until we see the ']' (or a ':'), and at that point we can't backtrace.
So, we use a combination of syntactic and semantic disambiguation to
treat this as a message send only when the type is an Objective-C type
and it has the syntax of a class message send (which would otherwise
be ill-formed).
llvm-svn: 114057
narrow, almost useless case where we're inside a parenthesized
expression, e.g.,
(NSArray alloc])
The solution to the general case still eludes me.
llvm-svn: 114039
part of parser recovery. For example, given:
a method1:arg];
we detect after parsing the expression "a" that we have the start of a
message send expression. We pretend we've seen a '[' prior to the a,
then parse the remainder as a message send. We'll then give a
diagnostic+fix-it such as:
fixit-objc-message.m:17:3: error: missing '[' at start of message
send expression
a method1:arg];
^
[
The algorithm here is very simple, and always assumes that the open
bracket goes at the beginning of the message send. It also only works
for non-super instance message sends at this time.
llvm-svn: 113968
a simple, quick check to determine whether the expression starting
with '[' can only be an Objective-C message send. If so, don't parse
it as an array subscript expression. This improves recovery for, e.g.,
[a method1]
[a method2]
so that we now produce
t.m:10:13: error: expected ';' after expression
[a method]
^
instead of some mess about expecting ']'.
llvm-svn: 105221
non-function-local declarations with names similar to what the user
typed. For example, this allows us to correct 'supper' to 'super' in
an Objective-C message send, even though the C function 'isupper' has
the same edit distance.
llvm-svn: 104023
consider "super" as a candidate whenever we're parsing an expression
within an Objective-C method in an interface that has a superclass. At
some point, we'd like to give "super" a little edge over non-local
names; that will come later.
llvm-svn: 104022
look from an Objective-C class or category to its implementation, to
pick up synthesized ivars. Fixes a problem reported by David
Chisnall.
llvm-svn: 101792
generally recover from typos in keywords (since we would effectively
have to mangle the token stream). However, there are still benefits to
typo-correcting with keywords:
- We don't make stupid suggestions when the user typed something
that is similar to a keyword.
- We can suggest the keyword in a diagnostic (did you mean
"static_cast"?), even if we can't recover and therefore don't have
a fix-it.
llvm-svn: 101274
receiver is a mis-typed class name. Previously, we would give a non-specific
typo-correction diagnostic from the expression-parsing code, but there
was no fix-it because it was too late to recover. Now, we give a nice
diagnostic
honk.m:6:4: error: unknown receiver 'Hnk'; did you mean 'Honk'?
[Hnk method];
^~~
Honk
honk.m:1:1: note: 'Honk' declared here
@interface Honk
^
which includes a fix-it.
We still need to recover better from mis-typing "super".
llvm-svn: 101211
we don't have enough information to tell them how to use 'strncmp'. Instead, change the
diagnostic to indicate they should use 'strncmp'.
llvm-svn: 100890
Remove -faccess-control from -cc1; add -fno-access-control.
Make the driver pass -fno-access-control by default.
Update a bunch of tests to be correct under access control.
llvm-svn: 100880
destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.
llvm-svn: 100832
that was present in a prior declaration, emit a warning rather than a
hard error (which we did before, and still do with mismatched
exception specifications). Moreover, provide a fix-it hint with the
throw() clause that should be added, e.g.,
t.C:10:7: warning: 'operator new' is missing exception specification
'throw(std::bad_alloc)'
void *operator new(unsigned long sz)
^
throw(std::bad_alloc)
As part of this, disable the warning when we're missing an exception
specification on operator new, operator new[], operator delete, or
operator delete[] when exceptions are turned off (-fno-exceptions).
Fixes PR5957.
llvm-svn: 99388
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
we look into a Scope that corresponds to a compound statement whose
scope was combined with the scope of the function that owns it. This
improves typo correction in many common cases.
llvm-svn: 92879
constructs:
- Instance variable lookup ("foo->ivar" and, in instance methods, "ivar")
- Property name lookup ("foo.prop")
- Superclasses
- Various places where a class name is required
- Protocol names (e.g., id<proto>)
This seems to cover many of the common places where typos could occur.
llvm-svn: 92449
Douglas Gregor