version of Ubuntu. It has a very broken multiarch configuration, and so
we need special logic to handle it correctly. Fixing and testing this
uncovered a few other trivial issues with the logic that are fixed as
well.
I added tests to cover this as it is hard to notice if you install
recent versions of the OS.
llvm-svn: 144165
block-typed __block variables using objc_retainBlock
and objc_dispose. Previously we were using
_Block_object_assign and _Block_object_destroy
with BLOCK_BYREF_CALLER, which causes the runtime
to completely ignore the retain and release.
In most cases this doesn't cause catastrophe
because the retain/release are balanced and
because the block in the variable was copied
upon assignment there. However, the stack
copy of the variable will be released when
it goes out of scope, which is a problem if
that value was released due to an assignment
to the heap copy. Similarly, a leak can occur
if the variable is assigned after the copy to
the heap.
llvm-svn: 144162
In certain cases ASTReader would call the normal DiagnosticsEngine API to initialize
the state of diagnostic pragmas but DiagnosticsEngine would try to compare source locations
leading to crash because the main FileID was not yet initialized.
Yet another case of the ASTReader trying to use the normal APIs and inadvertently breaking
invariants. Fix this by having the ASTReader set up the internal state directly.
llvm-svn: 144153
Analysis by Ted:
"
if (stateZero && !stateNotZero) {
is checking to see if:
(A) "it is possible for the value to be zero" (stateZero)
AND
(B) "it is not possible for the value to be non-zero" (!stateNotZero)
That said, the only way for both B to be true AND A to be false is if the path is completely infeasible by the time we reach the divide-by-zero check. For the most part (all cases?), such cases should automatically get pruned out at branches (i.e., an infeasible path gets dropped), which is the case in our tests. So the question is whether or not such an infeasible path might not get dropped earlier? I can't envision any right now.
Indeed, the rest of the checker assumes that if the bug condition didn't fire then 'stateNotZero' is non-NULL:
C.addTransition(stateNotZero);
"
llvm-svn: 144114
which they do. This avoids all of the default argument promotions that
we (1) don't want, and (2) undo during that custom type checking, and
makes sure that we don't run into trouble during template
instantiation. Fixes PR11320.
llvm-svn: 144110
useful when using Clang as a system-compiler, but its harmless. When
using Clang as a cross-compiler, this can be very handy as quite a few
toolchains ship their libc headers here rather than under
'/usr/include'.
For reference, this is the beginning of my work to also make the Clang
driver more suitable as a cross-compiler.
llvm-svn: 144089
The Neon load/store intrinsics need to be implemented as macros to avoid
hiding alignment attributes on the pointer arguments, and the macros can
only evaluate those pointer arguments once (in case they have side effects),
so it has been hard to get the right type checking for those pointers.
I tried various alternatives in the arm_neon.h header, but it's much more
straightforward to just check directly in Sema.
llvm-svn: 144075
written, instead of the resolved storage class, which might not be
legal to specify on the declaration (such as out-of-line definitions
of static class members in C++, and __local variables in OpenCL).
Initial patch by Richard Membarth.
llvm-svn: 144062
expression evaluation:
- When folding a non-value-dependent expression, we may try to use the
initializer of a value-dependent variable. If that happens, give up.
- In C++98, actually check that a const, non-volatile DeclRefExpr inside an ICE
is of integral or enumeration type (a reference isn't OK!)
- In C++11, DeclRefExprs for objects of const literal type initialized with
value-dependent expressions are themselves value-dependent.
- So are references initialized with value-dependent expressions (though this
case is missing from the C++11 standard, along with many others).
llvm-svn: 144056
Fariborz Jahanian