Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris Lattner c61089a6c2 Key decisions about 'bool' vs '_Bool' to be based on a new flag in langoptions.
This is simple enough, but then I thought it would be nice to make PrintingPolicy
get a LangOptions so that various things can key off "bool" and "C++" independently.
This spiraled out of control.  There are many fixme's, but I think things are slightly
better than they were before.

One thing that can be improved: CFG should probably have an ASTContext pointer in it,
which would simplify its clients.

llvm-svn: 74493
2009-06-30 01:26:17 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 7de5966d76 Create a new PrintingPolicy class, which we pass down through the AST
printing logic to help customize the output. For now, we use this
rather than a special flag to suppress the "struct" when printing
"struct X" and to print the Boolean type as "bool" in C++ but "_Bool"
in C.

llvm-svn: 72590
2009-05-29 20:38:28 +00:00
Douglas Gregor dce2b62b70 Parsing, semantic analysis, and template instantiation for typename
specifiers that terminate in a simple-template-id, e.g.,

  typename MetaFun::template apply<T1, T2>

Also, implement template instantiation for dependent
nested-name-specifiers that involve unresolved identifiers, e.g.,

  typename T::type::type

llvm-svn: 68166
2009-04-01 00:28:59 +00:00
Douglas Gregor b046ffb002 Some cleanup and renaming. No functionality change
llvm-svn: 68140
2009-03-31 20:22:05 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 333489bba3 Initial implementation of parsing, semantic analysis, and template
instantiation for C++ typename-specifiers such as

  typename T::type

The parsing of typename-specifiers is relatively easy thanks to
annotation tokens. When we see the "typename", we parse the
typename-specifier and produce a typename annotation token. There are
only a few places where we need to handle this. We currently parse the
typename-specifier form that terminates in an identifier, but not the
simple-template-id form, e.g.,

  typename T::template apply<U, V>

Parsing of nested-name-specifiers has a similar problem, since at this
point we don't have any representation of a class template
specialization whose template-name is unknown.

Semantic analysis is only partially complete, with some support for
template instantiation that works for simple examples. 

llvm-svn: 67875
2009-03-27 23:10:48 +00:00
Douglas Gregor f21eb49a04 Revamp our representation of C++ nested-name-specifiers. We now have a
uniqued representation that should both save some memory and make it
far easier to properly build canonical types for types involving
dependent nested-name-specifiers, e.g., "typename T::Nested::type".

This approach will greatly simplify the representation of
CXXScopeSpec. That'll be next.

llvm-svn: 67799
2009-03-26 23:50:42 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 1835391025 Generalize printing of nested-name-specifier sequences for use in both
QualifiedNameType and QualifiedDeclRefExpr. We now keep track of the
exact nested-name-specifier spelling for a QualifiedDeclRefExpr, and
use that spelling when printing ASTs. This fixes PR3493.

llvm-svn: 67283
2009-03-19 03:51:16 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 5253768ada Introduce a representation for types that we referred to via a
qualified name, e.g., 

  foo::x

so that we retain the nested-name-specifier as written in the source
code and can reproduce that qualified name when printing the types
back (e.g., in diagnostics). This is PR3493, which won't be complete
until finished the other tasks mentioned near the end of this commit.

The parser's representation of nested-name-specifiers, CXXScopeSpec,
is now a bit fatter, because it needs to contain the scopes that
precede each '::' and keep track of whether the global scoping
operator '::' was at the beginning. For example, we need to keep track
of the leading '::', 'foo', and 'bar' in
 
  ::foo::bar::x

The Action's CXXScopeTy * is no longer a DeclContext *. It's now the
opaque version of the new NestedNameSpecifier, which contains a single
component of a nested-name-specifier (either a DeclContext * or a Type
*, bitmangled). 

The new sugar type QualifiedNameType composes a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers with a representation of the type we're actually
referring to. At present, we only build QualifiedNameType nodes within
Sema::getTypeName. This will be extended to other type-constructing
actions (e.g., ActOnClassTemplateId).

Also on the way: QualifiedDeclRefExprs will also store a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers, so that we can print out the property
nested-name-specifier. I expect to also use this for handling
dependent names like Fibonacci<I - 1>::value.

llvm-svn: 67265
2009-03-19 00:18:19 +00:00