Similar in format to the `-checks=` argument, this new `-warnings-as-errors=`
argument upgrades any warnings emitted by the former to errors.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15528
llvm-svn: 257642
Summary: Virtual function override near miss detection. Function complete. Test complete. Do not conduct Fix for now.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by Cong Liu!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15823
llvm-svn: 257599
google-runtime-memset no longer issues a warning if the fill char value
is known to be an invalid fill char count.
Namely, it no longer warns for these:
memset(p, 0, 0);
memset(p, -1, 0);
In both cases, swapping the last two args would either be useless (there is
no actual bug) or wrong (it would introduce a bug).
Patch by Matt Armstrong!
llvm-svn: 257320
Summary: The new check will find all functionand variable definitions which may violate cpp one definition rule in header file.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Patch by Haojian Wu!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15710
llvm-svn: 257178
Summary: Since local static variables can outlive other local variables exclude them from the unnecessary copy initialization check.
Reviewers: alexfh
Patch by Felix Berger!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15822
llvm-svn: 256636
Summary:
The patch adds a new ClangTidy check that detects when expensive-to-copy types are unnecessarily copy initialized from a const reference that has the same or are larger scope than the copy.
It currently only detects this when the copied variable is const qualified. But this will be extended to non const variables if they are only used in a const fashion.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by Felix Berger!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15623
llvm-svn: 256632
This changeset still emits the diagnostic that the expression could be simplified, but it doesn't generate any fix-its that would lose comments or preprocessor directives within the text that would be replaced.
Fixes PR25842
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Patch by Richard Thomson! (+a naming style fix)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15737
llvm-svn: 256492
Summary:
clang-modernize transforms have moved to clang-tidy. Removing
the old tool now.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15606
llvm-svn: 255886
It is possible to assign arbitrary integer types to strings.
Sometimes it is the result of missing to_string call or apostrophes.
Reviewers: alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15411
llvm-svn: 255630
Summary:
This is http://reviews.llvm.org/D13746 but instead of including <array>,
a stub is provided.
This check flags all array subscriptions on static arrays and
std::arrays that either have a non-compile-time-constant index or are
out of bounds.
Dynamic accesses into arrays are difficult for both tools and humans to
validate as safe. array_view is a bounds-checked, safe type for
accessing arrays of data. at() is another alternative that ensures
single accesses are bounds-checked. If iterators are needed to access an
array, use the iterators from an array_view constructed over the array.
This rule is part of the "Bounds safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-bounds2-only-index-into-arrays-using-constant-expressions
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15030
llvm-svn: 255470
Summary:
With this change the error reported is on the identifier location
itself. It was declaration location before.
Reviewers: alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15203
llvm-svn: 254766
ClangTidy check for finding cases when std::move() is called with const or
trivially copyable arguments, that doesn't lead to any move or argument but it
makes copy. FixIt generates patch for removing call of std::move().
Patch by Vadym Doroshenko! (+ a couple of minor fixes)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12031
llvm-svn: 254070
Summary:
This check flags all array subscriptions on static arrays and
std::arrays that either have a non-compile-time-constant index or are
out of bounds.
Dynamic accesses into arrays are difficult for both tools and humans to
validate as safe. array_view is a bounds-checked, safe type for
accessing arrays of data. at() is another alternative that ensures
single accesses are bounds-checked. If iterators are needed to access an
array, use the iterators from an array_view constructed over the array.
This rule is part of the "Bounds safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-bounds2-only-index-into-arrays-using-constant-expressions
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13746
llvm-svn: 253401
Summary:
This check flags all use of c-style casts that perform a static_cast
downcast, const_cast, or reinterpret_cast.
Use of these casts can violate type safety and cause the program to
access a
variable that is actually of type X to be accessed as if it were of an
unrelated type Z. Note that a C-style (T)expression cast means to
perform
the first of the following that is possible: a const_cast, a
static_cast, a
static_cast followed by a const_cast, a reinterpret_cast, or a
reinterpret_cast followed by a const_cast. This rule bans (T)expression
only when used to perform an unsafe cast.
This rule is part of the "Type safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-type4-dont-use-c-style-texpression-casts-that-would-perform-a-static_cast-downcast-const_cast-or-reinterpret_cast.
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14096
llvm-svn: 252425
Summary: Consider a declaration an alias even if it doesn't have the same unqualified type than the container element, as long as one can be converted to the other using only implicit casts.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14442
llvm-svn: 252315
Summary: Use the old index name in the cases where the check would come up with an invented name.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14438
llvm-svn: 252308
Summary: The old index declaration is going to be removed anyway, so we can reuse its name if it is the best candidate for the new index.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14437
llvm-svn: 252303
Summary:
If the container expression was obtained from the point where "size" (which usually is a const method) is invoked, then the topmost node in this expression may be an implicit cast to const.
When the container is a data member, the check was trying to obtain the member expression directly and was failing in the case mentioned above. This is solved by ignoring implicit casts.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14378
llvm-svn: 252278
Summary: "std::unique_ptr<int>" is not the same type as "std::unique_ptr<int, std::default_delete<int>>", unless we insert a "hasCanonicalType" in the middle. Probably it also happens in other cases related to default template argument.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14291
llvm-svn: 252041
Summary:
I recently found that the variable naming wasn't working as expected with containers that are data members. The new index always received the name "Elem" (or equivalent) regardless of the container's name.
The check was assuming that the container's declaration was a VarDecl, which cannot be converted to a FieldDecl (a data member), and then it could never retrieve its name.
This also fixes some cases where the check failed to find the container at all (so it didn't do any fix) because of the same reason.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14289
llvm-svn: 251943
Summary: The previous change was focused in detecting when a non-const object was used in a constant way. Looks like I forgot the most important and trivial case: when the object is already constant. Failing to detect this cases results in compile errors, due to trying to bind a constant object to a non-const reference in the range-for statement. This change should fix that.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14282
llvm-svn: 251940
Summary:
Now, it detects that several kinds of usages are can't modify the elements. Examples:
-When an usage is a call to a const member function or operator of the element.
-If the element is used as an argument to a function or constructor that takes a const-reference or a value.
-LValue to RValue conversion, if the element is a fundamental type (which allows the use of most of the builtin operators).
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14198
llvm-svn: 251808
Summary: The check was assuming that a definition of a function always has a body, but a declaration that explicitly defaults or deletes a function is a definition too.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14238
llvm-svn: 251807
Summary: When traversing the parent map, the check assumed that all the nodes would be either Stmt or Decl. After r251101, this is no longer true: there can be TypeLoc and NestedNameSpecifierLoc nodes.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14229
llvm-svn: 251803
Summary:
When applying this check to the unit tests, it would hit an assertion:
llvm/tools/clang/lib/Lex/Lexer.cpp:1056: clang::SourceLocation clang::Lexer::getSourceLocation(const char*, unsigned int) const: Assertion `PP && "This doesn't work on raw lexers"' failed.
Reviewers: klimek, LegalizeAdulthood, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14204
llvm-svn: 251792
Jonathan Roelofs