options, which don't appear to be useful. -enable-mips-absolute-call is
completely unused (and unless I'm mistaken, is supposed to have the
same effect that -relocation-model=dynamic-no-pic should have),
and -disable-mips-abicall appears to be effectively a
synonym for -relocation-model=static. Adjust the few users of hasABICall
to checks which seem more appropriate. Update MipsSubtarget,
MipsTargetMachine, and MipselTargetMachine to synchronize with recent
changes.
llvm-svn: 77938
template partial specialization. Then, use those template arguments
when instantiating members of that class template partial
specialization. Fixes PR4607.
llvm-svn: 77925
pushes in the function prolog if the function doesn't have any stack space,
i.e. for a prolog like:
0x40011870: push %r15
0x40011872: push %r14
0x40011874: push %rbx
Patch by Zoltan!
llvm-svn: 77919
Module*.
Also, dropped uses of TargetMachine where unnecessary. The only target which
still takes a TargetMachine& is Mips, I would appreciate it if someone would
normalize this to match other targets.
llvm-svn: 77918
__builtin_bfin_ones does the same as ctpop, so it can be implemented in the front-end.
__builtin_bfin_loadbytes loads from an unaligned pointer with the disalignexcpt instruction. It does the same as loading from a pointer with the low bits masked. It is better if the front-end creates a masked load. We can always instruction select the masked to disalignexcpt+load.
We keep csync/ssync/idle. These intrinsics represent instructions that need workarounds for some silicon revisions. We may even want to convert inline assembler to intrinsics to enable the workarounds.
llvm-svn: 77917
Allow imp-def and imp-use of anything in the scavenger asserts, just like the machine code verifier.
Allow redefinition of a sub-register of a live register.
llvm-svn: 77904
support. This isn't immediately interesting, because Legalize
ends up lowering SELECT_CC if the target doesn't support it,
but this simplifies the process.
Also, if the SELECT_CC would be expanded in Legalize, it
can potentially end up with two copies of the condition
expression. By leaving it as SELECT+SETCC, the SELECT can be
expanded into two SELECTs that use a single SETCC.
The two comparisons are usually CSE'd, but depending on
when various expressions get legalized, the comparison
expression could involve calls to library functions, such
that the comparison expression may not be able to be CSE'd.
This will be needed by a future patch.
llvm-svn: 77896
Zhongxing Xu